Beyond Culturability: Advanced Strategies for Detecting the Viable But Non-Culturable State in Pathogenic Bacteria

Abstract

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state is a dormant bacterial condition that poses a significant challenge to public health, clinical diagnostics, and drug development. Cells in the VBNC state evade conventional culture-based detection, retain virulence potential, and exhibit heightened tolerance to antimicrobials, leading to diagnostic failures and persistent infections. This article provides a comprehensive analysis for researchers and drug development professionals, covering the fundamental biology of the VBNC state, a detailed examination of current and emerging detection methodologies, critical troubleshooting for complex matrices, and a comparative validation of techniques. By synthesizing the latest research, this review aims to equip scientists with the knowledge to accurately identify and quantify VBNC cells, thereby informing the development of more effective therapeutic and diagnostic strategies.

Unveiling the Stealth Pathogen: Defining the VBNC State and Its Clinical Significance

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state is a unique survival strategy adopted by many bacteria in response to adverse environmental conditions [1]. In this state, cells are metabolically active but cannot form colonies on routine microbiological media that would normally support their growth, presenting a profound challenge to public health, food safety, and clinical diagnostics [1] [2]. The VBNC concept has reshaped fundamental principles in microbiology, compelling a reevaluation of how microbial viability is defined and detected [3]. This evolution from a contested hypothesis to an established survival state represents a critical paradigm shift with extensive implications for pathogen detection, disease causation, and antimicrobial efficacy [1] [4].

This technical guide traces the conceptual journey of the VBNC state, framing it within ongoing research to develop robust detection methodologies. For researchers and drug development professionals, understanding this evolution is essential for designing effective strategies to counter the hidden threats posed by these elusive microbial populations.

Historical Milestones and Conceptual Evolution

The Initial Discovery and Formative Debates

The VBNC state was first identified in 1982 when Xu and colleagues observed that Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae remained metabolically active despite losing culturability on standard laboratory media [1] [5] [2]. The term "viable but non-culturable" was formally introduced in 1985 by Colwell and colleagues, marking a pivotal moment in microbiology [5]. This discovery challenged the century-old reliance on culturability as the gold standard for viability, suggesting that a vast portion of the microbial world had been overlooked by conventional methods [1] [3].

Early disputes questioned whether the VBNC state represented a distinct physiological condition or merely a pre-death stage [1]. Critics argued that non-culturability resulted from inadequate culture conditions rather than a genuine survival strategy [3]. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the list of bacteria demonstrated to enter the VBNC state expanded rapidly to include significant human pathogens such as Salmonella enteritidis, Shigella sonnei, and Legionella pneumophila [1]. This growing body of evidence solidified the biological significance of the phenomenon, though mechanistic understanding remained limited.

Molecular Validation and Modern Acceptance

The turn of the century brought crucial molecular insights that resolved many early controversies. Advanced techniques revealed that VBNC cells undergo extensive transcriptional reprogramming and maintain metabolic activity, supporting the VBNC state as a genetically controlled survival strategy rather than a passive deterioration process [1] [6].

Key molecular evidence included:

• Continuous gene expression and protein synthesis in VBNC cells [1]
• Specific genetic regulation during VBNC entry and resuscitation [1]
• Retention of virulence genes and pathogenic potential in VBNC pathogens [1] [7]
• Global changes in gene expression profiles, as demonstrated in Acinetobacter baumannii [6]

The diagram below illustrates the key milestones in the evolution of the VBNC concept:

Modern definition characterizes the VBNC state by three fundamental criteria: (1) Loss of culturability on media normally supporting growth, (2) Metabolic activity and membrane integrity, and (3) Capacity to resuscitate under appropriate conditions [3]. The VBNC state is now recognized as a distinct dormancy state fundamentally different from bacterial sporulation or persister cell formation [5] [2].

Defining Characteristics of the VBNC State

Diagnostic Features and Physiological Transformations

The VBNC state represents a profound physiological reprogramming that enables bacterial survival under conditions lethal to growing cells. Accurate identification requires distinguishing VBNC cells from both culturable and dead cells across multiple parameters [2] [3].

Table 1: Key Characteristics Differentiating VBNC Cells from Other Physiological States

Parameter	VBNC Cells	Culturable Cells	Dead Cells
Culturability	Cannot form colonies on routine media [1] [2]	Forms colonies on appropriate media [2]	Cannot form colonies on any media [2]
Membrane Integrity	Intact membrane [2] [3]	Intact membrane [2]	Damaged/compromised membrane [2]
Metabolic Activity	Reduced but measurable [1] [2]	High metabolic activity [2]	No metabolic activity [2]
Genetic Material	Retained plasmids and undamaged DNA [1] [2]	Normal genetic content [2]	Degrading DNA [2]
Gene Expression	Continuous but altered profile [1] [6]	Active gene expression [2]	No gene expression [2]
Resuscitation	Possible under appropriate conditions [1] [2]	Not applicable	Not possible [2]
Morphology	Dwarfing, cell rounding, coccoid forms [2] [7]	Normal morphology [2]	Often lysed or degraded [2]
Antibiotic Resistance	Increased tolerance [1] [4]	Normal susceptibility profile [4]	Not applicable

VBNC cells undergo dramatic structural and compositional changes, including reduced cell size (dwarfing) and a shift to coccoid morphology in normally rod-shaped bacteria [2]. The cell envelope is extensively modified with increased peptidoglycan cross-linking, changes in outer membrane protein profiles, and alterations in membrane fatty acid composition toward more unsaturated forms [1] [2]. These modifications contribute to the enhanced resistance of VBNC cells to environmental stresses, antibiotics, and disinfectants [1] [4].

Distinguishing VBNC from Persister Cells

A critical conceptual advancement has been the clarification between VBNC and persister cells, two distinct dormant phenotypes:

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of VBNC State versus Persister Cells

Characteristic	VBNC State	Persister Cells
Definition	Metabolically active but non-culturable state under normal growth conditions [5] [2]	Dormant, non-growing subpopulation within a culturable population [2] [4]
Induction	Response to extended environmental stress [1] [2]	Stochastic formation or response to antibiotics [2] [4]
Reversibility	Requires specific resuscitation signals or conditions [1] [5]	Spontaneous reversal upon antibiotic removal [2] [4]
Detection	Cannot be detected by plating; requires viability staining or molecular methods [1] [8]	Detectable by plating after antibiotic removal [2] [4]
Population	Entire population transitions simultaneously [1]	Small subpopulation (typically <1%) [2] [4]
Metabolic Activity	Reduced but measurable [1] [5]	Significantly reduced or dormant [2]

Recent research suggests these states may exist on a dormancy continuum, where actively growing cells under stress may first transition to persisters before entering the VBNC state under prolonged stress conditions [5]. This relationship was demonstrated in Vibrio vulnificus, where persister cells entered the VBNC state more rapidly (4-5 days) than log-phase cells (7-10 days) [5].

Environmental Triggers and Induction Conditions

The VBNC state can be induced by numerous environmental stresses commonly encountered in natural, industrial, and clinical settings. Different stressors may trigger distinct molecular pathways leading to the VBNC state [1] [7].

Table 3: Diverse Stressors Capable of Inducing the VBNC State

Stressor Category	Specific Examples	Representative Bacteria
Physical Stressors	Temperature extremes (low/high) [1] [7], UV irradiation [1] [7], Pulsed electric field [7], High pressure [7]	Vibrio vulnificus, Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli
Chemical Stressors	Nutrient starvation [1] [2], Osmotic stress [1] [9], Heavy metals [1], Chlorination [1] [8], Food preservatives [1] [7], Antibiotics [4]	Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, Acinetobacter baumannii
Biological Stressors	Microbial competition [1], Host defenses [1]	Various pathogens
Combination Stressors	Non-ionic surfactants + salts [10], Household cleaners [10]	L. monocytogenes, E. coli, S. aureus

Notably, induction can occur rapidly under certain conditions. For example, refrigerated pasteurized grapefruit juice induced the VBNC state in E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium within 24 hours [1], while combinations of non-ionic surfactants and salts induced VBNC states in multiple pathogens within 5-60 minutes [10].

The transition into the VBNC state involves extensive transcriptional reprogramming. In Acinetobacter baumannii, genome-wide expression profiling revealed hundreds of differentially regulated genes upon VBNC entry [6]. While the specific genetic regulators vary between species, common adaptations include:

• Downregulation of genes involved in energy-intensive processes like protein synthesis [2]
• Upregulation of stress response genes and specific outer membrane proteins like OmpW in E. coli [2]
• Modulation of regulatory networks involving RpoS and other stress sigma factors [1]
• Activation of toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems and other persistence-associated genes [4]

Resuscitation from the VBNC state can be triggered by various environmental cues, often involving the reversal of the inducing stress or passage through an appropriate host [1] [2]. The molecular mechanisms of resuscitation may involve:

• Quorum sensing signals and autoinducer molecules that enable population-level reactivation [10]
• Temperature upshift that reverses cold-induced VBNC states [1]
• Nutrient supplementation that provides essential growth components [1]
• Host-specific factors encountered during passage through animal or human systems [1]

The following diagram illustrates the dynamic cycle of VBNC induction and resuscitation in response to environmental cues:

Detection Methods and Methodological Evolution

Limitations of Culture-Based Approaches

Traditional microbiological methods relying on colony formation are intrinsically incapable of detecting VBNC cells, creating significant diagnostic blind spots [1] [4]. This limitation has profound implications for:

• Food safety monitoring, where pathogens may escape detection despite being viable and potentially pathogenic [1] [7]
• Clinical diagnostics, where VBNC pathogens may cause recurrent or persistent infections despite negative cultures [1] [5]
• Water quality assessment, where indicator organisms in VBNC state may lead to false assurances of safety [1]
• Antimicrobial efficacy testing, where VBNC cells survive treatment but are not counted in post-treatment viability assays [4]

The failure of culture-based methods has driven the development of alternative detection strategies that differentiate viability from culturability.

Advanced Detection Methodologies

Modern VBNC detection relies on a multi-parameter approach that assesses various aspects of cellular integrity and function. The following workflow outlines a comprehensive strategy for VBNC cell detection and confirmation:

Key methodological approaches include:

1. Membrane Integrity Staining

• Principle: Uses fluorescent dyes that differentiate intact versus compromised membranes [8] [3]
• Common dyes: SYTO9 (green, membrane-permeant) and propidium iodide (red, membrane-impermeant) in LIVE/DEAD BacLight kit [6] [10]
• Applications: Rapid assessment of cell viability, though may overestimate viability in some cases [8] [6]

2. Metabolic Activity Assays

• CTC Reduction: Measures respiratory activity through reduction of 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride to insoluble red formazan [6] [3]
• ATP Measurement: Quantifies cellular ATP using luciferase-based assays [10]
• Substrate Utilization: API test strips assess fermentation patterns and enzymatic activities [10]

3. Viability PCR (v-PCR)

• Principle: Uses photoreactive dyes like propidium monoazide (PMA) or ethidium monoazide (EMA) that penetrate dead cells with compromised membranes and covalently bind DNA, preventing PCR amplification [8] [9]
• Optimization: PMAxx (improved PMA) combined with EMA at specific concentrations (e.g., 10 μM EMA + 75 μM PMAxx) effectively inhibits amplification from dead cells [8]
• Applications: Specific detection and quantification of VBNC pathogens in complex matrices like process wash water [8] and food samples [9]

Research Reagent Solutions for VBNC Studies

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for VBNC State Investigation

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application
Viability Stains	LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit (SYTO9/PI) [6] [10], CTC (5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride) [6] [3]	Differentiation of live/dead cells based on membrane integrity and metabolic activity
DNA Binding Dyes for v-PCR	Propidium Monoazide (PMA/PMAxx) [8] [9], Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) [8]	Selective inhibition of DNA amplification from dead cells with compromised membranes
Metabolic Indicators	ATP detection kits [10], API test strips [10]	Assessment of metabolic activity and substrate utilization
Resuscitation Promoters	Quorum sensing molecules (e.g., autoinducers) [10], Catalase [4]	Facilitation of VBNC cell resuscitation by countering oxidative stress or providing signaling molecules
Growth Media Supplements	Pyruvate [4], Blood supplements [9]	Neutralization of reactive oxygen species in culture media that may prevent VBNC cell growth

Implications for Public Health and Therapeutic Development

Pathogenicity and Disease Implications

VBNC pathogens retain virulence potential through multiple mechanisms:

• Resuscitation in host environments: VBNC cells of Vibrio cholerae and pathogenic E. coli resuscitate during passage through animal intestinal tracts [1]
• Continued toxin production: Enteropathogenic E. coli in VBNC state continue producing enterotoxins [1]
• Expression of virulence factors: VBNC Helicobacter pylori cells express virulence factors like cagA, vacA, and vreA [1]
• Association with outbreaks: VBNC cells have been implicated in foodborne outbreaks from salted salmon roe and dried processed squid in Japan [7]

The clinical significance is substantial, as VBNC pathogens may cause:

• Recurrent urinary tract infections from uropathogenic E. coli in VBNC state [1]
• Persistent gastrointestinal infections from resuscitated Campylobacter and Salmonella [9] [7]
• Aseptic infections incorrectly attributed to viruses when bacterial cultures are negative [1]

Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

VBNC cells exhibit markedly increased tolerance to antibiotics and disinfectants, creating therapeutic challenges [1] [4]. This enhanced resistance stems from:

• Reduced metabolic activity decreasing the efficacy of antimicrobials targeting active cellular processes [1] [4]
• Membrane modifications that reduce permeability to antimicrobial agents [1] [2]
• Enhanced stress response systems that provide cross-protection against multiple stressors [2] [4]
• Potential retention of resistance plasmids that can be transferred upon resuscitation [1]

This resistance profile necessitates revised antimicrobial testing protocols that account for VBNC populations, as current standards focused on planktonic, growing cells may significantly underestimate survival rates after treatment [4].

Future Directions and Research Priorities

The evolution of the VBNC concept continues with several critical research frontiers:

1. Molecular Mechanism Elucidation

• Comprehensive mapping of genetic regulatory networks controlling VBNC entry and exit
• Identification of specific biomarkers for reliable VBNC detection across bacterial species
• Characterization of resuscitation signals and their receptor systems

2. Detection Method Advancements

• Development of standardized, validated protocols for VBNC detection in complex matrices
• Creation of commercial detection kits specifically designed for VBNC pathogens
• Implementation of high-throughput screening methods for antimicrobial efficacy against VBNC cells

3. Clinical and Industrial Applications

• Revised guidelines for diagnostic microbiology that incorporate VBNC detection
• Enhanced sanitation protocols that effectively eliminate VBNC pathogens
• Therapeutic approaches targeting VBNC resuscitation mechanisms

The journey from the initial discovery of non-culturable cells to the modern molecular understanding of the VBNC state has transformed fundamental concepts in microbiology. As detection methods continue to evolve, so too will our understanding of this sophisticated bacterial survival strategy and our ability to counter its challenges to public health and food safety.

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state represents a sophisticated survival strategy employed by bacteria to endure stressful environmental conditions. In this dormant state, bacteria remain metabolically active and retain pathogenicity but cannot proliferate on conventional culture media, rendering them undetectable by standard microbiological methods [11] [5]. This phenomenon has profound implications across clinical, food safety, and environmental sectors, where VBNC cells contribute to chronic infections, foodborne outbreaks, and persistent contamination despite negative culture-based tests [11] [10]. Understanding the precise environmental triggers and molecular adaptations underlying VBNC induction is therefore critical for developing effective detection and treatment strategies to mitigate the hidden risks posed by these resilient bacterial populations.

Environmental Triggers of VBNC State Induction

Bacteria transition into the VBNC state when confronted with unfavorable environmental conditions. These inducers are diverse and can be systematically categorized based on the nature of the stress applied.

Chemical Stressors

Chemical stressors represent one of the most effective and rapidly acting inducers of the VBNC state, commonly encountered in industrial and clinical settings.

• Household Cleaners and Surfactants: Combinations of non-ionic surfactants and inorganic salts can rapidly induce the VBNC state in pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Staphylococcus aureus. The hydrophobicity of the surfactant, measured by its Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB), correlates with VBNC induction potential, with Gram-positive bacteria showing greater susceptibility. Induction can occur in as little as 5 minutes of exposure [10].
• Disinfectants and Oxidizing Agents: Chemical disinfectants such as sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) and peracetic acid (PAA) are potent inducers. For instance, disinfectant concentrations as low as 0.5-3.0 mg/L NaClO can drive Pseudomonas aeruginosa into the VBNC state [12].
• Organic Acids: In food systems, acetic acid concentration has been identified as having the greatest effect on VBNC formation in Pediococcus acidilactici, followed by nutritional conditions and salt concentration. A concentration of 1.0% acetic acid was particularly effective [13].
• Inorganic Salts: Specific salts, including ammonium carbonate and MgCl₂, can induce the VBNC state, especially when combined with surfactants. A solution containing 0.5 or 1.0% Lutensol A03 and 0.2 M ammonium carbonate induced approximately 6.5 Log₁₀ cells/mL of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae into the VBNC state within one hour [14] [15] [10].

Table 1: Key Chemical Inducers of the VBNC State

Inducing Agent	Example Concentrations	Target Bacteria	Induction Time
Non-ionic Surfactants + Salts	0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 + 0.2 M (NH₄)₂CO₃ [14]	V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae [14]	1 hour [14]
Sodium Hypochlorite (NaClO)	0.5 - 3.0 mg/L [12]	P. aeruginosa [12]	Minutes [12]
Acetic Acid	1.0% (v/v) [13]	P. acidilactici [13]	Varies with conditions [13]
Heavy Metals (e.g., Copper)	Information not specified in search results	E. coli W3110 [16]	Varies with conditions [16]

Physical Stressors

Physical stressors related to processing and environmental storage conditions are common triggers.

• Temperature Shifts: Low temperatures, particularly 4°C, are a classic and widespread method for VBNC induction in many bacterial species, including Vibrio vulnificus and E. coli [10] [17]. This is especially relevant for food storage.
• UV Radiation: UV exposure is a highly effective physical inducer. Studies on Salmonella Typhimurium used UV intensity of 0.055 mW/cm² for durations of 10, 20, and 30 minutes, leading to a loss of culturability while membrane integrity remained intact [18]. Similarly, UV treatment inactivated P. aeruginosa, inducing a VBNC state [12].
• Nutrient Deprivation: Incubation in nutrient-poor or starvation conditions, such as artificial seawater or minimal media, is a well-established method to induce the VBNC state, as demonstrated in E. coli W3110 [16].

Additional Stressors

Other significant stressors include:

• Antibiotics: Exposure to sub-lethal or lethal concentrations of antibiotics, such as erythromycin, can force bacteria into the VBNC state as a last-ditch survival response [16] [17].
• Osmotic Stress: High concentrations of sodium chloride (NaCl) can induce the VBNC state. Studies on P. acidilactici used NaCl concentrations up to 15% [13].

Table 2: Key Physical and Additional Inducers of the VBNC State

Inducing Agent	Example Conditions	Target Bacteria	Key Findings/Outcome
Low Temperature	4°C [10] [17]	V. vulnificus, E. coli [10] [17]	A classic, long-term induction method [10] [17]
UV Radiation	0.055 mW/cm² for 10-30 min [18]	Salmonella Typhimurium, P. aeruginosa [18] [12]	Rapid induction; membrane integrity maintained [18]
Nutrient Deprivation	Artificial Seawater [16]	E. coli W3110 [16]	Well-established starvation-induced model [16]
Antibiotics	Erythromycin [16]	E. coli W3110 [16]	Linked to stress survival and treatment failure [16] [17]
High Salt	Up to 15% NaCl [13]	P. acidilactici [13]	Contributes to osmotic stress induction [13]

Molecular and Physiological Mechanisms of VBNC Entry

The transition into the VBNC state is not a passive process but an active, genetically regulated response involving profound molecular and physiological restructuring. The following diagram illustrates the core pathway from stress perception to the established VBNC state.

Key Molecular Regulators

• Toxin-Antitoxin (TAS) Modules: Under normal conditions, a stable toxin is bound and neutralized by its cognate, labile antitoxin. Environmental stress triggers the degradation of the antitoxin, freeing the toxin to act on its targets. The active toxin halts fundamental processes like translation and replication, precipitating a state of growth arrest and dramatically increasing antimicrobial tolerance [11].
• Stringent Response and Global Regulators: The stringent response, mediated by the alarmone (p)ppGpp in response to nutrient stress, orchestrates a massive transcriptional reprogramming. This includes the downregulation of energy-intensive processes and the upregulation of stress resistance genes. Global regulators like RpoS (the stationary phase sigma factor) further modulate the expression of genes essential for survival under adverse conditions [11].

Biomolecular and Structural Changes

Upon entry into the VBNC state, cells undergo a comprehensive metabolic and structural transformation:

• Metabolic Downshifting: There is a general reduction in metabolic activity, though cells maintain basal metabolism and energy production, as evidenced by continued ATP synthesis [16] [10].
• Cell Wall and Membrane Remodeling: VBNC cells exhibit increased peptidoglycan cross-linking and alterations in the composition of outer membrane proteins (Omps) and fatty acids. These changes fortify the cell envelope, conferring higher resistance to physical and chemical stresses [16] [5]. For example, E. faecalis in the VBNC state shows higher peptidoglycan crosslinking, and E. coli exhibits increased levels of OmpW [5].
• Changes in Biomolecular Composition: ATR-FTIR spectroscopy has revealed significant spectral changes in VBNC cells, including increased RNA levels and decreased protein and nucleic acid concentrations. The 995 cm⁻¹ RNA band has been proposed as a consistent spectroscopic biomarker for VBNC cells across different stress conditions [16].
• Morphological Changes: Cells often undergo a reduction in size and a change in shape, such as a transition from rod-shaped to a smaller, coccoid form, to minimize energy requirements and surface area [16].

Advanced Detection and Analysis Methodologies

Overcoming the "non-culturable" barrier requires sophisticated viability testing methods that do not rely on growth. The following workflow outlines a multi-method approach to confirm VBNC state induction.

Critical Detection Techniques

• Viability PCR (vPCR): This method uses nucleic acid intercalating dyes like propidium monoazide (PMA) or DyeTox13 to distinguish between live and dead cells. These dyes penetrate cells with compromised membranes (dead cells) and covalently bind to DNA upon photoactivation, preventing its amplification by PCR. This allows for the selective detection of DNA from viable cells (including VBNC) with intact membranes [14] [13] [18]. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) offers absolute quantification and higher sensitivity for detecting low concentrations of VBNC cells [18].
• Fluorescence Microscopy with Viability Staining: Kits like the LIVE/DEAD BacLight use a combination of fluorescent dyes SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (PI). SYTO 9 stains all cells green, while PI only penetrates cells with damaged membranes, staining them red and causing a reduction in green fluorescence. Thus, viable cells with intact membranes fluoresce green, allowing for direct counting [13] [10]. The CTC-DAPI assay is used to determine respiratory activity, another marker of viability [16].
• Metabolic Activity Assays: Measurement of intracellular ATP levels using luciferase-based assays provides a direct indicator of metabolic activity in VBNC cells [12] [10]. Additionally, assays like the API 20E test strips can assess the fermentation patterns and catabolism of substrates, confirming retained metabolic functionality despite non-culturability [10].
• Advanced Spectroscopic Techniques: ATR-FTIR spectroscopy is an emerging, label-free technique that detects biochemical changes in cells, such as alterations in RNA, protein, and lipid profiles. It has identified specific spectral biomarkers, like the 995 cm⁻¹ RNA band, associated with the VBNC state [16].

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for VBNC Research

Reagent / Kit	Function / Application	Example Use Case
PMA (Propidium Monoazide)	DNA intercalating dye for viability qPCR/ddPCR; suppresses DNA amplification from dead cells.	Differentiating viable Vibrio and Salmonella from dead cells in food and environmental samples [13] [18] [12].
DyeTox13	DNA intercalating dye for viability PCR; indicates loss of enzymatic activity and membrane integrity.	Assessing metabolic activity loss in UV-treated Salmonella [18].
LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit	Fluorescent staining (SYTO 9/PI) for assessing cell membrane integrity via microscopy.	Confirming membrane integrity of surfactant-induced VBNC L. monocytogenes [13] [10].
API 20E Test Strips	Micro-assay system for testing carbohydrate fermentation and amino acid catabolism.	Profiling metabolic activity of VBNC L. monocytogenes after stress removal [10].
ATP Assay Kits	Luciferase-based measurement of intracellular ATP levels to confirm metabolic activity.	Verifying metabolic activity in disinfectant-induced VBNC P. aeruginosa [12] [10].

The induction of the VBNC state is a complex, genetically orchestrated survival response to a diverse array of environmental threats, from common disinfectants to nutrient deprivation. The molecular blueprint of this state involves key players like toxin-antitoxin systems and the stringent response, leading to a fortified, dormant cell with a distinct biomolecular signature. This understanding, coupled with advanced, culture-independent detection methodologies, is paramount for accurately assessing microbial risks in public health, food safety, and clinical settings. Future research must focus on elucidating the precise signals governing resuscitation and developing novel therapeutic strategies that can effectively target and eradicate this resilient subpopulation of bacteria.

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state represents a fundamental survival strategy adopted by numerous bacteria when confronted with adverse environmental conditions. In this physiological state, cells are characterized by a loss of culturability on standard laboratory media that would normally support their growth, while simultaneously maintaining metabolic activity, cellular integrity, and often, pathogenic potential [3] [1]. First identified in 1982, this phenomenon has since been documented in over 85 bacterial species, including at least 67 significant human pathogens [19] [1]. The VBNC state poses a formidable challenge to public health systems and food safety protocols worldwide because these dormant cells evade detection by conventional culture-based methods—the gold standard in most clinical and industrial settings—yet retain the capacity to resuscitate and cause disease when conditions become favorable [19] [1].

The critical public health implications of the VBNC state are increasingly evident. Numerous disease outbreaks have been reported where VBNC bacteria were implicated as the causative agent, including incidents involving Salmonella Oranienburg in dried processed squids and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 in salted salmon roe [19]. Furthermore, VBNC pathogens have been linked to chronic and recurrent infections, such as persistent urinary tract infections caused by uropathogenic E. coli, which can resist antibiotic treatment while in this dormant state [1]. This whitepaper provides a comprehensive technical analysis of the VBNC state, focusing on its molecular basis, detection methodologies, and profound implications for food safety and chronic disease, with the aim of equipping researchers and drug development professionals with the knowledge to address this invisible threat.

Defining Characteristics and Molecular Basis of the VBNC State

Diagnostic Features of VBNC Cells

The transition to the VBNC state is marked by distinct physiological and morphological changes. Key characteristics that differentiate VBNC cells from their culturable counterparts and dead cells are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Key Characteristics of VBNC Bacterial Cells

Characteristic	VBNC State	Normal Culturable State	Dead Cells
Culturability	Non-culturable on routine media	Culturable	Non-culturable
Metabolic Activity	Reduced but detectable	High	Absent
Membrane Integrity	Maintained	Maintained	Compromised
Cell Division	Absent	Present	Absent
Gene Expression	Altered but continuous	Normal	Absent
Respiratory Activity	Present	Present	Absent
Morphology	Dwarfing, rounding	Normal	May be intact or lysed
Virulence Potential	Often retained	Present	Absent
Resuscitation Capability	Yes	N/A	No

VBNC cells typically exhibit reduced metabolic activity, though crucial metabolic processes such as respiration and ATP generation continue [1]. They maintain membrane integrity, as demonstrated by their exclusion of dyes like propidium iodide (PI), while actively respiring cells can reduce tetrazolium salts (CTC) to formazan [6]. Morphologically, cells often undergo dwarfing and conversion from rods to coccoid forms, as observed in Vibrio vulnificus and Acinetobacter baumannii [3] [6]. Critically, many VBNC pathogens retain their virulence properties and can express virulence factors, such as the continued production of enterotoxin by VBNC E. coli and the expression of cagA, vacA, and vreA virulence factors by Helicobacter pylori [1].

Molecular Mechanisms Underpinning VBNC State Formation

The transition into the VBNC state is governed by sophisticated molecular mechanisms activated in response to environmental stress. Figure 1 illustrates the core regulatory pathways involved.

Figure 1: Core molecular pathways regulating bacterial entry into the VBNC state

The Stringent Response

The stringent response is a key survival mechanism activated by nutrient starvation and other stresses. This response is mediated through the synthesis of alarmones guanosine tetraphosphate and pentaphosphate (collectively termed (p)ppGpp) [20]. Accumulation of (p)ppGpp leads to massive reprogramming of cellular metabolism by binding to RNA polymerase and affecting the transcription of hundreds of genes, ultimately downregulating energy-intensive processes such as DNA replication, protein synthesis, and cell division, thereby facilitating dormancy [20].

Toxin-Antitoxin (TA) Systems

TA systems consist of a stable toxin protein and an unstable antitoxin that inhibits the toxin's activity. Under stress conditions, proteases such as Lon and ClpP degrade the antitoxin, allowing the toxin to act on cellular targets [20]. Toxins can inhibit essential processes including DNA replication, translation, and ATP synthesis, effectively slowing metabolism and promoting entry into the VBNC state. The expression levels of genes related to the TA trigger system (rpoS, spoT, relA, ppx, ppk, and lon) are upregulated in VBNC cells [20].

Oxidative Stress

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation is a common feature in VBNC induction. Studies have demonstrated that ROS levels show a sigmoidal relationship with the VBNC incidence index when Salmonella is induced by thermo-sonication [20]. Conversely, pretreatment with radical scavengers like sodium pyruvate inhibits VBNC formation, confirming the role of oxidative stress. Bacterial antioxidant defense systems, including alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC), catalase (KatA, KatG, KatE), and superoxide dismutase (SodA, SodB, SodC), are crucial in counterbalancing internal oxidation and can influence the transition to the VBNC state [20].

Global Gene Regulation

Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses reveal that entry into the VBNC state involves differential expression of hundreds of genes. In E. coli O157:H7, 97 genes and 56 proteins show significant alterations upon VBNC entry, affecting processes including membrane transport, central metabolism, DNA replication, and cell division [20]. These changes collectively drive the cell toward a state of low metabolic activity while maintaining viability.

Environmental Stressors Inducing the VBNC State in Foodborne Pathogens

Food processing and preservation techniques, designed to eliminate or control pathogenic bacteria, can paradoxically induce the VBNC state. Table 2 summarizes the primary induction conditions for major foodborne pathogens.

Table 2: VBNC Induction Conditions for Prominent Foodborne Pathogens

Pathogen	Documented Induction Conditions	Relevant Food Matrices	Reference
Escherichia coli O157:H7	Low temperature, UV exposure, high pressure carbon dioxide, starvation	Lettuce, spinach, grapefruit juice, drinking water	[19] [1]
Salmonella spp.	NaCl stress, low temperature, low pH, nutrient starvation	Dried processed squid, flour, grapefruit juice	[19] [18]
Listeria monocytogenes	Potassium sorbate (pH 4.0), chlorine, low temperature	Milk products, process wash water	[19] [8]
Campylobacter jejuni	Oxygen-rich conditions, low temperature, nutrient starvation	Poultry meat, raw milk	[19] [21]
Vibrio vulnificus	Low temperature (4-5°C)	Aquatic environments, seafood	[3]
Acinetobacter baumannii	High-salt media, desiccation, pH and temperature stress	Hospital environments	[6]

Common food processing interventions that can induce the VBNC state include:

• Physical Treatments: Refrigeration, freezing, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, pulsed electric field, high hydrostatic pressure, and thermo-sonication [19] [20].
• Chemical Treatments: Preservatives (e.g., potassium sorbate), disinfectants (e.g., chlorine, peracetic acid), high salt concentrations, and acidic pH [19] [12].
• Environmental Factors: Nutrient starvation, oxygen availability, and osmotic stress [1].

For example, Listeria monocytogenes can enter the VBNC state within 24 hours in the presence of potassium sorbate at pH 4.0, while E. coli O157:H7 becomes non-culturable after UV disinfection or in refrigerated pasteurized grapefruit juice within 24 hours of incubation [19] [1].

The resuscitation of VBNC cells—their return to a culturable, metabolically active state—occurs when favorable conditions are restored, posing a significant public health threat. Resuscitation can be triggered by various stimuli, including:

• Temperature Upshift: Moving to optimal growth temperatures [19].
• Nutrient Supplementation: Addition of specific nutrients or resuscitation promoters such as sodium pyruvate [19].
• Passage Through Host Organisms: In vivo resuscitation in animal models or human hosts [1] [21].

Critically, resuscitated VBNC cells often retain their pathogenicity. For instance, VBNC Listeria monocytogenes cells resuscitated by incubation with embryonated eggs regained virulence identical to that of culturable cells [19]. Similarly, VBNC Vibrio cholerae O1 caused fluid accumulation in rabbit ileal loops, and non-culturable Legionella pneumophila cells caused death in chick embryos [1].

The persistence of VBNC cells in the environment further compounds their public health risk. Laboratory studies have demonstrated that VBNC Campylobacter can remain intact in soil for up to 28 days and in water for at least 63 days, depending on environmental conditions [21]. Similarly, VBNC Acinetobacter baumannii could be resuscitated after 10 months of incubation under high-salt conditions [6].

Advanced Detection Methods for VBNC Pathogens

Limitations of Conventional Culture and the Need for Alternative Methods

Traditional plate counting methods are incapable of detecting VBNC cells, creating a dangerous false sense of security when monitoring food safety, water quality, and clinical samples [1]. This fundamental limitation has driven the development of alternative detection strategies that differentiate VBNC cells from both culturable and dead bacteria based on indicators of viability beyond growth capability.

Molecular Detection Methods Combining Viability Markers and Amplification

Advanced molecular techniques that couple viability markers with nucleic acid amplification have emerged as powerful tools for VBNC detection. Figure 2 illustrates a sophisticated workflow for detecting VBNC cells in complex matrices.

Figure 2: Experimental workflow for molecular detection of VBNC cells in complex matrices

Viability PCR (v-PCR) with DNA-Intercalating Dyes

Viability PCR (v-PCR) utilizes DNA-intercalating dyes such as propidium monoazide (PMA), PMAxx (an improved version of PMA), and ethidium monoazide (EMA) to differentiate between viable and dead cells [8] [18]. These dyes share a critical property: they penetrate only cells with compromised membranes (characteristic of dead cells) and form covalent bonds with DNA upon photoactivation, thereby inhibiting PCR amplification [8] [18]. Consequently, DNA from viable cells (with intact membranes, including VBNC cells) remains accessible for amplification.

The v-PCR protocol typically involves:

• Sample pretreatment: Homogenization and concentration if necessary [21].
• Dye addition: Incubation with PMA (10-100 μM, depending on sample type) in the dark [8] [18].
• Photoactivation: Exposure to a halogen light source for 15-20 minutes to crosslink the dye with DNA from dead cells [8] [18].
• DNA extraction and amplification: Standard nucleic acid extraction followed by qPCR or ddPCR [8] [18].

For complex matrices like process wash water from vegetable processing, a combination of EMA (10 μM) and PMAxx (75 μM) incubated at 40°C for 40 minutes followed by a 15-minute light exposure effectively inhibited most qPCR amplification from dead cells, allowing specific detection of VBNC Listeria monocytogenes [8].

Digital Droplet PCR (ddPCR) with Viability Markers

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) offers advantages over qPCR for VBNC detection, particularly through its absolute quantification without need for standard curves, higher sensitivity at low target concentrations, and reduced susceptibility to PCR inhibitors present in complex sample matrices [18]. When combined with viability dyes, ddPCR enables precise quantification of VBNC cells.

Recent research has introduced novel DNA-intercalating dyes such as DyeTox13, which functions similarly to PMA but may offer improved differentiation of cellular physiological states [18]. A combination treatment of DyeTox13 and EMA has shown promise in detecting metabolic activity loss in Salmonella under stress conditions in flour, providing a rapid alternative for detecting viable Salmonella in food products [18].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents for VBNC Research

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VBNC Detection and Characterization

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function in VBNC Research	Application Notes
Viability Dyes	PMA, PMAxx, EMA, DyeTox13	Penetrate dead cells with compromised membranes and inhibit DNA amplification	Concentration optimization required for different sample matrices [8] [18]
Nucleic Acid Amplification Reagents	qPCR & ddPCR master mixes, target-specific primers/probes	Amplify target genes from viable cells for detection and quantification	ddPCR offers superior quantification for low-concentration targets [18]
Metabolic Activity Probes	5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC), CMFDA	Detect respiratory activity (CTC reduction) or enzymatic activity in viable cells	Used in combination with flow cytometry or microscopy [3] [6]
Membrane Integrity Stains	SYTO9, Propidium Iodide (PI)	Differentiate cells with intact (SYTO9+/PI-) vs. damaged (SYTO9+/PI+) membranes	Basis of LIVE/DEAD staining kits; may overestimate viability [8] [6]
Resuscitation Promoters	Sodium pyruvate, specialized nutrient supplements	Facilitate recovery of VBNC cells to culturable state for confirmation	Concentration and composition vary by bacterial species [19]

Method Comparison and Validation Challenges

While molecular methods have significantly advanced VBNC detection, challenges remain in method validation. Flow cytometry combined with viability staining, while previously recommended, may not be suitable for all matrices, particularly those with complex compositions like process wash water, which can cause interferences and lead to overestimation of dead cells [8]. Furthermore, no single method can completely discriminate between dead and VBNC cells, often leading to a slight overestimation of the VBNC population [8]. Therefore, a combinatorial approach utilizing multiple detection methods is recommended for conclusive identification of VBNC cells.

The VBNC state represents a significant public health blind spot with far-reaching implications for food safety, water security, and clinical medicine. As this whitepaper has detailed, VBNC pathogens evade conventional detection methods, persist under adverse conditions, and retain pathogenic potential, enabling them to cause both acute outbreaks and chronic infections. The molecular mechanisms governing VBNC induction—including the stringent response, toxin-antitoxin systems, oxidative stress, and global gene regulation—provide targets for future interventions aimed at preventing entry into or promoting resuscitation from this dormant state.

Addressing the challenge posed by VBNC pathogens requires a multifaceted approach. First, regulatory frameworks for food safety and water quality must incorporate advanced detection methods that can recognize VBNC cells, moving beyond reliance solely on culture-based techniques. Second, the development of novel antibacterial strategies that either prevent VBNC induction or specifically target VBNC cells is crucial for combating persistent infections. Finally, increased surveillance and reporting of VBNC-related outbreaks will enhance our understanding of the true prevalence and impact of this hidden threat.

As research continues to unravel the complexities of the VBNC state, it is imperative that these scientific advances translate into practical solutions for protecting public health. By illuminating this microbial "dark matter," we can develop more effective strategies to mitigate the risks posed by these elusive pathogens and close a critical gap in our global health security infrastructure.

Within the realm of microbiology, bacterial dormancy represents a fundamental survival strategy that poses significant challenges for clinical treatment, public health, and diagnostic accuracy. Among these dormant forms, the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state, persister cells, and bacterial spores constitute three major adaptations that enable bacteria to withstand lethal environmental stresses [5] [22] [2]. The accurate detection and differentiation of these states, particularly the VBNC state, is crucial for overcoming limitations in clinical diagnostics and food safety testing where standard culture methods routinely fail to detect viable pathogens [14] [23]. This whitepaper provides a comprehensive technical comparison of these dormancy states, with particular emphasis on VBNC detection methodologies essential for researchers and drug development professionals addressing persistent infections and diagnostic limitations.

The VBNC state describes a condition wherein bacterial cells remain viable and metabolically active but lose the ability to form colonies on routine laboratory media normally supporting their growth [22] [2]. First identified in 1982 by Colwell and colleagues, this state is now recognized as a widespread survival strategy across numerous bacterial species, including significant human pathogens [22] [2]. The clinical and industrial implications of VBNC cells are substantial, as they retain virulence potential and can resuscitate under favorable conditions, leading to recurrent infections and undetected contamination [5] [23]. Despite advances in molecular detection, the VBNC state continues to represent a notable gap in diagnostic capabilities, driving ongoing research into reliable identification and eradication methods.

Defining the Dormancy States: Core Concepts and Characteristics

Viable But Non-Culturable (VBNC) State

The VBNC state is a survival strategy induced by various environmental stresses wherein bacteria become non-culturable on standard media but maintain viability, metabolic activity, and the potential for resuscitation [22] [2]. Cells in the VBNC state undergo significant physiological transformations, including reduced cell size, change to coccoid morphology, and altered cell wall and membrane composition [5] [2]. These modifications enhance cellular resistance to multiple stresses, including antibiotics, temperature extremes, and chemical disinfectants [2]. Entry into the VBNC state is typically triggered by nutrient starvation, temperature fluctuations, osmotic stress, or exposure to antimicrobial agents [5] [23]. The resuscitation from VBNC state occurs when favorable conditions return, though the molecular mechanisms governing this transition remain an active research area [2] [24].

Persister Cells

Persister cells represent a subpopulation of non-growing or slow-growing bacteria within an otherwise susceptible population that exhibit transient multidrug tolerance without genetic resistance [22] [17]. First described by Joseph Bigger in 1944, persisters are genetically identical to their susceptible counterparts but enter a dormant state either stochastically or in response to environmental cues [22] [17]. This population demonstrates a biphasic killing pattern when exposed to lethal antibiotic concentrations—an initial rapid decline of susceptible cells followed by a much slower decline of the persistent fraction [22]. Persisters are notably prevalent in biofilms and stationary-phase cultures, contributing significantly to chronic and recurrent infections that are difficult to eradicate with conventional antibiotic regimens [5] [17].

Bacterial Spores

Bacterial spores (endospores) represent the most extreme form of bacterial dormancy, characterized by a metabolically inactive state with exceptional resistance to environmental extremes [17]. Unlike VBNC and persister cells, sporulation is a complex, genetically programmed differentiation process primarily observed in Firmicutes species such as Bacillus and Clostridium [17]. Spores exhibit a multi-layered protective structure including a core containing DNA and proteins, surrounded by a cortex, spore coat, and in some cases, an exosporium. This specialized structure confers remarkable resistance to heat, radiation, chemicals, and desiccation that far exceeds the tolerance observed in VBNC or persister cells [17]. Germination occurs in response to specific germinants and involves a irreversible return to vegetative growth, distinct from the resuscitation dynamics of VBNC cells.

Table 1: Core Characteristics of Bacterial Dormancy States

Characteristic	VBNC State	Persister Cells	Bacterial Spores
Culturability	Non-culturable on standard media [22]	Culturable on standard media post-stress [22]	Culturable on standard media post-germination [17]
Metabolic Activity	Low but detectable [22] [2]	Reduced/heterogeneous [17]	Dormant/undetectable [17]
Genetic Basis	Physiological adaptation [2]	Physiological adaptation [22]	Genetically programmed differentiation [17]
Induction Triggers	Multiple stresses (starvation, temperature, osmotic) [2] [23]	Antibiotic exposure, nutrient limitation [22] [17]	Nutrient starvation [17]
Reversibility	Resuscitation under favorable conditions [2] [24]	Regrowth after stress removal [22] [17]	Germination in response to specific germinants [17]
Prevalence in Species	Over 100 species [22]	Widespread across species [17]	Primarily Firmicutes [17]

Comparative Analysis: Molecular Mechanisms and Physiological Basis

Induction Mechanisms and Regulatory Networks

The molecular pathways governing entry into each dormancy state display both shared elements and distinct mechanisms. VBNC induction involves comprehensive transcriptional reprogramming and proteomic shifts that enhance cellular protection. Key changes include upregulation of stress response proteins (e.g., RpoS, OxyR), alterations in membrane composition (increased unsaturated fatty acids), and enhanced peptidoglycan cross-linking [5] [2] [24]. Research using Vibrio parahaemolyticus has identified lactate dehydrogenase (LldD) as a critical regulator of VBNC state entry and resuscitation potential [24]. In contrast, persister formation frequently involves toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules, stringent response pathways mediated by (p)ppGpp, and regulatory mechanisms that transiently arrest bacterial growth [22] [17] [25]. Sporulation represents the most complex and genetically determined process, orchestrated by sequential activation of sporulation-specific sigma factors (σ^F, σ^E, σ^G, σ^K) that coordinate morphological and physiological transformation [17].

The Dormancy Continuum Hypothesis

Emerging evidence suggests that bacterial dormancy exists along a spectrum rather than as discrete states. The dormancy continuum hypothesis proposes that actively growing cells under stress transition into persisters, which may further develop into VBNC state cells under sustained stress conditions [22]. This model is supported by research demonstrating that persister cells of Vibrio vulnificus enter the VBNC state more rapidly than log-phase cells when exposed to cold stress [22]. The continuum concept has significant implications for understanding infection recurrence and antibiotic treatment failure, as cells may move between different dormancy depths in response to fluctuating environmental conditions [22] [25].

Methodological Approaches: Detection, Differentiation, and Characterization

VBNC Detection Methods

Conventional culture-based methods are incapable of detecting VBNC cells, necessitating alternative viability assessments [14] [2]. Current methodologies combine multiple complementary approaches:

• Viable Quantitative PCR (vqPCR): This technique employs DNA intercalating dyes (e.g., propidium monoazide) that penetrate compromised membranes of dead cells to covalently modify DNA, preventing its amplification. Subsequent PCR targeting of essential genes (groEL, ompW) specifically detects DNA from viable cells, including those in VBNC state [14]. Established vqPCR assays demonstrate high sensitivity, detecting as few as 3.5 V. parahaemolyticus cells and 6.9 V. cholerae cells [14].

• Flow Cytometry with Cell Sorting: Advanced applications using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) enable identification and physical separation of VBNC subpopulations based on differential membrane integrity and metabolic activity using fluorescent viability markers [24]. This approach revealed distinct VBNC subpopulations (P1 and P2) in V. parahaemolyticus with different resuscitation potentials [24].

• Direct Viable Count (DVC): This method combines microculture in nutrient-rich media with antibiotics to inhibit cell division, followed by fluorescent staining to identify elongated, metabolically active cells that fail to form colonies [2].

• Gene Expression Analysis: Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting stress response genes or virulence factors provides evidence of metabolic activity in non-culturable cells [5] [2].

Table 2: Detection Methodologies for Dormancy States

Methodology	VBNC State	Persister Cells	Bacterial Spores
Culture-Based	Not detectable [14]	Detectable after antibiotic removal [17]	Detectable after germination [17]
Molecular	vqPCR, RT-PCR [14] [2]	PCR after antibiotic treatment [17]	PCR with spore-specific targets [17]
Cytometry	FACS with viability staining [24]	FACS with viability staining [17]	Flow cytometry with spore stains [17]
Microscopy	DVC, SEM morphology [2] [24]	Limited utility	Phase-bright appearance, specific staining [17]
Proteomic	Differential expression analysis [24]	Limited applications	Spore-specific protein profiling [17]

Experimental Protocols for VBNC State Research

Protocol 1: Rapid Induction of VBNC State for Control Samples

Generating reliable VBNC control cells is essential for methodological development and validation. Recent research established a rapid induction protocol for Vibrio species achieving approximately 6.5 Log~10~ cells/mL transition to VBNC state within one hour from an initial 7.3 Log~10~ viable cells/mL [14].

Procedure:

• Grow target strain to mid-logarithmic phase (OD~600~ ≈ 0.4-0.5) in appropriate medium
• Harvest cells by gentle centrifugation (3,000 × g, 10 min)
• Resuspend pellet in induction solution containing 0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 and 0.2 M ammonium carbonate
• Incubate suspension at room temperature for 60 min with gentle agitation
• Confirm VBNC state by plating on appropriate media and viable counting methods [14]

Protocol 2: Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting of VBNC Subpopulations

This protocol enables resolution of heterogeneous VBNC populations based on differential metabolic activity and membrane characteristics [24].

Procedure:

• Induce VBNC state using appropriate stressor (e.g., low temperature, nutrient starvation)
• Stain bacterial suspension with viability markers:
  • SYTO 9 (0.5-5 µM, final concentration) for total cells
  • Propidium iodide (5-30 µM) for membrane-compromised cells
  • ChemChrome V6 (10-100 µM) for esterase activity
• Incubate stained samples in dark (15-30 min, room temperature)
• Analyze and sort using flow cytometer with appropriate laser configurations:
  • P1 subpopulation: Lower metabolic activity, reduced resuscitation potential
  • P2 subpopulation: Higher metabolic activity, better resuscitation potential [24]
• Collect sorted populations for downstream proteomic analysis or resuscitation assays

Research Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Methodologies

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for VBNC State Studies

Reagent/Method	Function	Application Examples
Propidium Monoazide (PMA)	DNA intercalating dye for selective amplification from viable cells [14]	vqPCR detection of VBNC Vibrio in seafood samples [14]
SYTO 9/Propidium Iodide	Dual staining for membrane integrity assessment [24]	FACS analysis of VBNC subpopulations in V. parahaemolyticus [24]
ChemChrome V6	Fluorogenic substrate for esterase activity detection [24]	Metabolic activity assessment in VBNC L. monocytogenes [23]
Lutensol A03/Ammonium Carbonate	Chemical inducers of VBNC state [14]	Rapid generation of VBNC control cells for assay validation [14]
Lactate Supplementation	Enhances resuscitation from VBNC state [24]	Extending resuscitation window in Vibrio studies [24]
groEL/ompW Gene Targets	PCR amplification for viable cell detection [14]	Species-specific detection of VBNC V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae [14]

Research Implications and Future Directions

The accurate discrimination between bacterial dormancy states has profound implications for clinical microbiology, pharmaceutical development, and food safety. The existence of VBNC cells explains many cases of culture-negative infections and post-treatment recurrence where pathogens evade detection yet maintain virulence potential [5] [2]. In pharmaceutical development, understanding the continuum between persister and VBNC states informs strategies for targeting antibiotic-tolerant populations [22] [17] [25]. Food safety regulations relying exclusively on culture-based detection significantly underestimate risk from VBNC pathogens, necessitating integration of advanced detection methods [14] [23].

Future research priorities include establishing standardized detection protocols for VBNC cells across different bacterial species, elucidating the precise molecular triggers for resuscitation, and developing anti-dormancy compounds that either prevent VBNC state entry or force resuscitation to render cells susceptible to conventional antibiotics [5] [17]. The integration of vqPCR and cytometric methods into regulatory frameworks represents a critical step toward comprehensive risk assessment that accounts for the entire viable bacterial population, not merely the culturable fraction [14] [23]. As our understanding of bacterial dormancy deepens, so too will our ability to combat the persistent infections and undetected contaminations that currently challenge both clinical and industrial sectors.

The Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) state represents a critical survival strategy adopted by numerous bacterial pathogens when confronted with sublethal environmental stresses. In this physiological condition, bacteria maintain metabolic activity and viability while losing the ability to form colonies on conventional growth media—the very foundation of standard microbiological detection methods [14] [8]. This dichotomy creates a "virulence conundrum" of significant proportions for public health and food safety: pathogens that evade routine detection while retaining pathogenic potential, including the capacity for toxin production and resuscitation under favorable conditions [14] [26].

Over 60 pathogenic bacterial species are known to enter this dormant state, including significant foodborne and healthcare-associated pathogens such as Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio cholerae, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae [14] [8] [27]. The induction of the VBNC state can be triggered by diverse stressors common in food processing and clinical environments, including nutrient deprivation, temperature fluctuations, osmotic challenges, and exposure to sublethal concentrations of antimicrobial agents such as chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, and antibiotics [8] [27] [28]. The resilience of VBNC cells extends to increased resistance against further antimicrobial treatments, creating a persistent reservoir of pathogens that can resuscitate when conditions improve, potentially leading to disease outbreaks and chronic infections [27] [26].

This technical guide examines advanced methodologies for detecting and quantifying VBNC cells, assesses the pathogenic potential they retain despite their dormant state, and evaluates the risks associated with their resuscitation, providing researchers and drug development professionals with cutting-edge tools to address this invisible threat.

Methodological Framework: Detection and Quantification of VBNC Cells

Conventional culture-based methods, long considered the gold standard in microbiology, fail completely to detect bacteria in the VBNC state, leading to potentially dangerous false-negative results [14] [26]. Research indicates that culture-based methods may miss between 50-56% of samples containing VBNC Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae that are detectable via more advanced methods [14]. This critical limitation has driven the development of sophisticated techniques that bypass the need for cellular replication while confirming viability.

Viability Quantitative PCR (v-qPCR) and Digital Droplet PCR (ddPCR)

Viability quantitative PCR methods employ DNA intercalating dyes such as propidium monoazide (PMA), PMAxx (an improved version), and ethidium monoazide (EMA) that penetrate only cells with compromised membranes—characteristic of dead bacteria. Once inside, these dyes bind covalently to DNA upon photoactivation, preventing its amplification in subsequent PCR reactions [8] [27]. This selectively allows amplification of DNA from viable cells (including VBNC cells) with intact membranes, providing a powerful tool to distinguish between live and dead bacterial populations.

Recent advancements have demonstrated that ddPCR combined with PMA treatment (PMA-ddPCR) offers significant advantages for absolute quantification of VBNC cells without requiring external standard curves. This method partitions samples into thousands of nanodroplets, each containing a discrete number of DNA molecules, enabling precise quantification of target genes through Poisson statistical analysis [27]. For accurate quantification, targeting an average of three single-copy genes (such as KP, rpoB, and adhE for K. pneumoniae) is recommended to ensure robust results [27].

Table 1: Performance Comparison of VBNC Detection Methods

Method	Principle	Sensitivity	Advantages	Limitations
Culture Methods	Growth on nutrient media	N/A for VBNC	Gold standard for culturable cells; inexpensive	Cannot detect VBNC cells; false negatives
v-qPCR with PMA/EMA	Selective DNA amplification from viable cells	3.5 cells for V. parahaemolyticus [14]	High sensitivity; quantitative; specific	Matrix interference; requires optimization
PMA-ddPCR	Absolute quantification via microdroplet PCR	1.13-0.64 log10 reduction detectable [27]	No standard curve needed; precise quantification	Higher cost; specialized equipment
Flow Cytometry	Membrane integrity with fluorescent dyes	Variable	Rapid; visual confirmation	Overestimates dead cells in complex matrices [8]
AI-Enabled Hyperspectral Imaging	Spectral signature analysis of single cells	97.1% accuracy [28]	Label-free; rapid; single-cell resolution	Emerging technology; requires AI training

Advanced and Emerging Detection Technologies

While molecular methods dominate current VBNC detection research, several innovative approaches show significant promise:

AI-enabled hyperspectral microscope imaging (HMI) represents a cutting-edge approach that leverages artificial intelligence to identify VBNC cells based on their unique spectral profiles. This method has demonstrated remarkable 97.1% accuracy in classifying VBNC E. coli by training EfficientNetV2-based convolutional neural networks on pseudo-RGB images created from characteristic spectral wavelengths, significantly outperforming traditional RGB image analysis (83.3% accuracy) [28].

Flow cytometry with viability staining (e.g., SYTO9 and propidium iodide) has been widely used to differentiate cells with intact and compromised membranes. However, studies have revealed limitations in complex matrices like process wash water from food facilities, where organic matter can cause interference and lead to overestimation of dead cells [8]. This highlights the importance of method validation for specific sample types.

Table 2: Optimal Conditions for PMA Treatment in VBNC Detection

Parameter	Recommended Conditions	Variations Based on Application
PMA Concentration	5-200 μM [27]	10 μM EMA + 75 μM PMAxx for Listeria in water [8]
Incubation Time	5-30 minutes in dark [27]	40 minutes at 40°C for complex water matrices [8]
Light Exposure	15 minutes with 650W halogen light [27]	15-minute exposure standard across studies
Sample Cooling	On ice during light exposure [27]	Prevents overheating during photoactivation

Experimental Protocols: Induction, Detection, and Quantification

Standardized protocols for VBNC induction and detection are essential for reproducible research. Below are detailed methodologies consolidated from recent studies.

Rapid VBNC Induction Protocol forVibrioSpecies

To generate VBNC cell controls for method validation, researchers have developed a rapid induction protocol that achieves the VBNC state within approximately one hour [14]:

• Initial Culture: Grow V. parahaemolyticus or V. cholerae to approximately 7.3 Log10 viable cells/mL in appropriate broth medium.
• Induction Solution: Treat bacterial suspension with a solution containing 0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 and 0.2 M ammonium carbonate.
• Incubation: Incubate the treatment mixture for one hour with mild agitation.
• Confirmation: Verify VBNC state by absence of growth on conventional culture media while maintaining metabolic activity confirmed by staining or molecular methods.
• Output: Expected yield of approximately 6.5 Log10 cells/mL in VBNC state [14].

VBNC Induction with Low-Level Antimicrobials

For studies investigating the effect of food processing conditions on bacterial survival, low-level antimicrobial stressors provide a more realistic induction method:

• Bacterial Strain: Escherichia coli K-12 or other relevant pathogens.
• Stressors: Prepare sublethal concentrations of oxidative (0.01% hydrogen peroxide) or acidic (0.001% peracetic acid) stressors.
• Exposure: Incubate bacteria with stressors for 3 days under appropriate temperature conditions.
• Confirmation: Verify VBNC state using live/dead staining (e.g., SYTO9/PI) combined with plate counting to confirm non-culturability [28].

Comprehensive VBNC Detection Using PMA-ddPCR

For absolute quantification of VBNC cells, particularly in complex samples like fecal matter or environmental samples, the following protocol is recommended:

• Sample Preparation: Concentrate cells if necessary from liquid samples using centrifugation (2,500 × g for 5 minutes).
• PMA Treatment:
  • Add PMA to sample at optimized concentration (5-200 μM based on validation).
  • Incubate in dark for 5-30 minutes.
  • Perform photoactivation with halogen light source for 15 minutes with sample on ice.
• DNA Extraction: Isolate genomic DNA using commercial kits (e.g., Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit).
• Droplet Generation: Partition DNA samples into approximately 20,000 nanodroplets using droplet generator.
• PCR Amplification: Perform amplification with target-specific primers for single-copy genes.
• Quantification Analysis: Count positive and negative droplets using droplet reader and apply Poisson statistics to determine absolute copy numbers of target genes [27].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the integrated process for VBNC cell induction, detection, and risk assessment:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for VBNC Studies

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function in VBNC Research
Viability Dyes	PMA, PMAxx, EMA, SYTO9/PI	Differentiate viable/dead cells based on membrane integrity
Induction Agents	Lutensol A03, Ammonium Carbonate, H₂O₂, PAA	Induce VBNC state through controlled stress
Molecular Kits	Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit	High-quality DNA extraction for PCR-based detection
PCR Reagents	Premix Ex Taq, specific primers (groEL, ompW)	Amplify target genes for detection and quantification
Digital PCR Systems	Droplet generators, reader systems	Absolute quantification without standard curves
Cell Culture Media	LB Broth, ASW, BHI Broth	Maintain cultures and provide resuscitation environments
Antibiotics	Ciprofloxacin, other broad-spectrum	Study antibiotic-induced VBNC state and resistance

Pathogenic Potential: The Virulence Retention Mechanism

The public health significance of VBNC cells stems from their retention of pathogenic potential despite their dormant state. Research has confirmed that VBNC cells maintain metabolic activity and continue to express toxin-encoding genes, preserving their ability to cause disease upon resuscitation [14] [26].

Conceptual Framework for Pathogenic Potential Assessment

The pathogenic potential (PP) of microorganisms can be quantified using a mathematical formulation that accounts for both the fraction of infected individuals who become symptomatic and the mortality rate. The proposed formula is:

PP = (Fs/I) × (10M)

Where:

• Fs = Fraction of symptomatic individuals
• I = Infecting inoculum size
• M = Mortality fraction [29]

This formulation demonstrates that virulence is inversely proportional to the inoculum size required to cause symptoms, providing a quantitative framework for comparing pathogenic potential across microbial species and states, including VBNC cells [29].

Experimental Evidence of Virulence Retention

Multiple studies have demonstrated that VBNC pathogens retain their virulence capabilities:

• Vibrio species: VBNC forms of pathogenic Vibrio spp. have been resuscitated and shown to cause infections in mouse models, confirming retained virulence despite their non-culturable state [26].
• Toxin production: VBNC cells of V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae continue to express toxin-encoding genes, maintaining their pathogenic capacity even when undetectable by culture methods [14].
• Antibiotic resistance: VBNC cells exhibit enhanced resistance to antimicrobial treatments and have been implicated in recurrent infections following antibiotic therapy, particularly in biofilm-associated infections [26].

The ability of VBNC cells to maintain virulence factors during dormancy represents a significant threat in clinical, food safety, and public health contexts, as these cells can resuscitate under appropriate conditions and initiate infections long after the initial exposure.

The transition from VBNC state back to actively metabolizing and culturable forms presents significant risks for disease outbreaks and chronic infections. Understanding the mechanisms and triggers of resuscitation is essential for developing effective intervention strategies.

Resuscitation of VBNC cells can occur when favorable conditions are restored, though the specific triggers vary by bacterial species and environmental context:

• Temperature shift: Moving VBNC cells from low temperatures to their optimal growth temperature can initiate resuscitation.
• Nutrient availability: Introduction to nutrient-rich media after nutrient deprivation can reverse the VBNC state.
• Quorum sensing molecules: Some bacteria require autoinducers or signaling molecules to trigger resuscitation.
• Host factors: Passage through appropriate animal models or exposure to host cellular environments can resuscitate VBNC pathogens [26].

Research on high alcohol-producing K. pneumoniae (HiAlc Kpn) has demonstrated that resuscitation and ethanol production can be maintained after antibiotic removal, though certain antibiotics like ciprofloxacin can inhibit the recovery of VBNC-state cells [27].

Advanced detection methods are enabling new strategies to mitigate resuscitation risks:

• Antibiotic selection: Specific antibiotics like ciprofloxacin have shown inhibitory effects on VBNC cell resuscitation, suggesting potential for targeted interventions [27].
• Quorum sensing disruption: Interfering with bacterial communication systems that may trigger resuscitation.
• Environmental monitoring: Implementation of advanced detection methods in critical control points within food processing and healthcare settings to identify VBNC contamination before resuscitation occurs.
• Hurdle technology: Combining multiple sublethal stresses in food processing to prevent simultaneous reversal of VBNC state across entire bacterial populations.

The VBNC state represents a significant challenge to conventional microbiological paradigms and public health protection systems. The "virulence conundrum" lies in the disconnect between detectability and pathogenic potential: while standard methods fail to detect these dormant cells, they retain the capacity for virulence and resuscitation under appropriate conditions.

Addressing this challenge requires integrated approaches:

• Implementation of advanced detection methods that bypass culturalility requirements, such as v-qPCR, PMA-ddPCR, and AI-enabled hyperspectral imaging, particularly in critical food safety and clinical diagnostics applications.
• Recognition of VBNC induction conditions in industrial and clinical settings to minimize the creation of dormant pathogen reservoirs.
• Development of targeted intervention strategies that either prevent resuscitation or eliminate VBNC cells before they can revert to active states.
• Enhanced regulatory frameworks that incorporate VBNC detection in safety monitoring protocols for food, water, and pharmaceutical products.

As research continues to unravel the complex molecular mechanisms underlying VBNC formation and resuscitation, new opportunities for intervention will emerge. For now, vigilance and appropriate methodological selection provide the best defense against this invisible threat lurking within the microbial world.

The Detection Arsenal: From Viability Staining to AI-Powered Imaging

In bacterial viability research, the term "gold standard" has traditionally been ascribed to culture-based methods, where the ability to form colonies on solid media defines a cell as "alive" [30] [31]. This definition is fundamentally rooted in cellular replication as the ultimate proof of life. However, the discovery and extensive documentation of the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state in bacteria have exposed a significant limitation in this paradigm. In this dormant state, induced by various environmental stresses, bacteria retain metabolic activity and pathogenicity but lose the ability to form colonies on routine media upon which they would typically grow [11] [5] [32]. This VBNC state presents a substantial challenge for public health, food safety, and clinical diagnostics, as these cells evade detection by standard culture methods while remaining potentially infectious [14] [33].

Flow cytometry (FCM), particularly when coupled with live/dead fluorescent staining, has emerged as a powerful tool to overcome the constraints of culture-based detection. This technique allows for rapid, single-cell analysis without the need for cellular replication, making it theoretically capable of detecting VBNC cells [31] [33]. The core principle of these staining kits is based primarily on membrane integrity. Fluorescent dyes like SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (PI) are commonly used in combination; SYTO 9 penetrates all cells, while PI only enters those with compromised membranes, displacing SYTO 9 and causing a shift from green to red fluorescence [31] [34]. However, while this method is celebrated for its speed and convenience, its application as a definitive viability indicator, especially within the complex context of VBNC state research, is fraught with complications and requires critical examination [30] [31].

The Mechanism and Workflow of Live/Dead Staining

The widespread adoption of live/dead staining kits in flow cytometry is largely due to their straightforward operational principle and interpretable results. The functionality of these assays hinges on the differential permeability of fluorescent dyes through bacterial membranes.

Staining Principles and Dye Chemistry

The integrity of the cytoplasmic membrane is a key discriminator in these assays. "Live" stains, such as SYTO 9 and related SYTO dyes, are typically membrane-permeant and can label all cells by binding to nucleic acids [30] [34]. In contrast, "dead" stains like propidium iodide (PI), SYTOX, and various fixable viability dyes are impermeant to intact membranes but readily enter cells with compromised barrier function [31] [34]. The most common commercial kit, the LIVE/DEAD BacLight, utilizes the phenomenon of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and competitive binding; PI, with a higher affinity for DNA, displaces SYTO 9 in membrane-damaged cells, altering the fluorescence emission [31].

A critical advancement in this field is the development of fixable viability dyes. These amine-reactive dyes form covalent bonds with intracellular and extracellular proteins. In live cells with intact membranes, only surface amines are labeled, resulting in dim fluorescence. In dead cells, the dye penetrates freely and labels a vast pool of internal proteins, generating intense fluorescence. This covalent binding preserves viability information even after cell fixation and permeabilization, a crucial feature for intracellular staining protocols or working with pathogenic samples [34].

Standard Staining Protocol for Flow Cytometry

The following workflow outlines a typical procedure for assessing bacterial viability using a live/dead stain prior to flow cytometric analysis. This protocol is adaptable for pure bacterial cultures but requires optimization for complex samples like multispecies biofilms [30].

Table 1: Common Viability Dyes for Flow Cytometry

Dye Name	Principle	Excitation/Emission	Key Feature	Compatibility with Fixation
SYTO 9	Nucleic acid binding, cell-permeant	~480/500 nm (Green)	Stains all cells	No
Propidium Iodide (PI)	Nucleic acid intercalation, cell-impermeant	~535/617 nm (Red)	Stains only membrane-compromised cells	No
SYTOX Family	Nucleic acid binding, cell-impermeant	Varies by type (e.g., Blue, Green, Orange)	Bright staining; requires maintained external concentration	No
LIVE/DEAD Fixable Stains	Amine-reactive, protein-binding	Multiple colors available (e.g., Violet, Aqua, Red)	Covalent binding preserves signal after fixation	Yes

Limitations and Challenges in VBNC State Research

While live/dead staining with flow cytometry is a valuable tool, its application in VBNC research is not a panacea. Relying solely on membrane integrity as a viability marker presents several significant limitations that researchers must acknowledge.

The Membrane Integrity-Viability Disconnect

A fundamental assumption of these stains is that a compromised membrane equates to cell death. However, this is not always congruent with the physiological state of the cell, particularly for VBNC cells. A cell in the VBNC state may possess an intact membrane but be non-culturable, while a cell with a transiently damaged membrane might still be capable of repair and culturality [30] [11]. Research has shown that staining results can be influenced by factors beyond viability, such as the stain-to-cell concentration ratio, which can artificially shift the perceived proportions of live and dead subpopulations [30]. Furthermore, studies on gram-negative bacteria like E. coli and Salmonella enterica have revealed that intermediate staining states (neither fully green nor fully red) can correspond to damage specifically to the outer membrane, while the cytoplasmic membrane remains intact—a state not necessarily equivalent to death [31].

The Problem of Multi-Species Biofilms and Dye Uptake

The natural environment, including the human oral cavity and aquatic systems, is dominated by complex, multi-species biofilms [30] [5]. Commercial viability staining kits are often validated for a limited number of planktonic bacterial species, and their performance can be unreliable when applied to diverse microbial communities. Different species within a biofilm exhibit variable uptake kinetics for dyes due to differences in membrane composition, the presence of efflux pumps, and the physical barrier of the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) [30]. This can lead to both false positives and false negatives in viability assessment. As noted in a critical review, the manual for the LIVE/DEAD BacLight kit itself points out that it is not suitable for natural multispecies biofilm research, a warning often overlooked in the literature [30].

Inability to Distinguish VBNC from Other States

Live/dead staining operates on a binary classification (live/dead) that is ill-suited to capture the continuum of metabolic and physiological states in a bacterial population. Crucially, it cannot distinguish between:

• Viable, culturable cells
• Viable but non-culturable (VBNC) cells
• Persister cells (a different type of dormant state)
• Dead cells [11] [5]

This is a major diagnostic shortfall. A VBNC cell with an intact membrane will be stained as "live" by these kits, but this result conflates it with actively growing cells, masking its true dormant and non-culturable nature. This limitation underscores why staining methods should be considered substitutes for culturability and must be compared with appropriate microbiological data, such as the calculation of Plating Efficiency (PE), rather than just Colony Forming Units (CFU) [30].

Advanced and Complementary Methodologies

To address the limitations of standalone live/dead staining, researchers are developing and validating more sophisticated, multi-parameter approaches.

Viability PCR (vPCR) and Flow Cytometry-Cell Sorting (VFC)

A powerful emerging technique combines the sorting capability of flow cytometry with the specificity of PCR to detect and quantify VBNC pathogens. This "viability based flow cytometry-cell sorting and qPCR" (VFC + qPCR) assay involves staining an environmental sample with a viability dye (e.g., PI), using FCM to sort the "live" (dye-excluding) population, and then applying qPCR to quantify specific pathogens within that viable fraction [33]. This method was successfully used to detect VBNC Legionella pneumophila in hospital water samples that tested negative by the standard culture method [33]. Similarly, viable qPCR (vqPCR) using DNA intercalating dyes like PMA (propidium monoazide) can inhibit DNA amplification from dead cells with compromised membranes, allowing for the specific detection of viable cells (including VBNC) in a sample [14] [15].

Metabolic Activity Probes and Staining Panels

Beyond membrane integrity, assessing metabolic activity is a more reliable indicator of the VBNC state. Stains like Fluorescein Diacetate (FDA) are non-fluorescent precursors that are cleaved by intracellular esterases in metabolically active cells to produce a fluorescent product [30]. Combining FDA with a membrane integrity dye like Ethidium Bromide (EB) in a "vital fluorescence staining" method has been proposed as a better-proven approach for biofilm research [30]. Modern flow cytometers can simultaneously measure multiple parameters, allowing researchers to create staining panels that probe different aspects of cellular physiology, thus painting a more comprehensive picture of heterogeneity within a microbial population, including the VBNC subpopulation.

Table 2: Comparison of Viability Assessment Methods for VBNC Detection

Method	Principle	Detects VBNC?	Advantages	Disadvantages
Culture (ISO Standards)	Cellular replication	No	Considered the "gold standard", identifies cultivable pathogens	Slow (days), misses VBNC and stressed cells
Live/Dead Staining + FCM	Membrane integrity	Indirectly (as "live")	Rapid (hours), single-cell resolution, high-throughput	Does not confirm culturality or metabolic state, affected by dye kinetics
Viability PCR (vPCR/vqPCR)	Membrane integrity + DNA detection	Yes	Specific, sensitive, faster than culture	May not differentiate between VBNC and active cells, dye cytotoxicity concerns
ATP Assay	Metabolic activity (ATP presence)	Yes	Very rapid, indicates metabolic activity	Does not confirm culturality, can be low in dormant cells
VFC + qPCR	Membrane integrity + FCM sorting + gene detection	Yes	Specific quantification of viable pathogens, culture-independent	Complex workflow, requires specialized equipment
Amoebae Co-culture	Resuscitation via host cells	Yes	Confirms resuscitability and pathogenicity	Time-consuming, not quantitative, complex

Integrated Workflow for Comprehensive VBNC Analysis

To robustly identify and characterize VBNC cells, a single method is insufficient. The most reliable strategy employs an integrated, multi-method approach that cross-validates results. The diagram below outlines a proposed workflow for confirming the presence of VBNC cells in a sample.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Methods

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for VBNC Studies

Reagent/Method	Primary Function	Example Application in VBNC Research
LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit	Differential staining based on membrane integrity	Initial, rapid screening for presence of membrane-intact cells in a sample that fails to culture [30] [31].
Fixable Viability Dyes	Covalent labeling of dead cells for fixed samples	Viability assessment in pathogenic samples requiring inactivation before FCM analysis, or in intracellular staining protocols [34].
PMA/Ethidium Monoazide	DNA intercalating dye for viability qPCR	Selective suppression of DNA amplification from dead cells with porous membranes, enabling detection of viable cells (including VBNC) by qPCR [14] [33].
Fluorescein Diacetate (FDA)	Stain for enzymatic (esterase) activity	Probing metabolic activity in bacterial populations as a second viability parameter beyond membrane integrity [30].
Resuscitation Promoting Factors (Rpf)	Bacterial cytokine promoting growth recovery	Experimental reactivation of VBNC cells to confirm their viability and return to a culturable state [32].
Amoebae Co-culture	Host-dependent resuscitation	Confirming the resuscitability and potential pathogenicity of VBNC pathogens like Legionella from environmental samples [33].

Live/dead staining coupled with flow cytometry represents a significant technological advancement for rapid viability assessment in bacteriology. However, within the specific context of VBNC state research, its role must be carefully defined. It is a valuable tool for initial screening and quantifying subpopulations with intact membranes, but it is not a definitive "gold standard" replacement. The method's principal limitation lies in its reliance on a single parameter—membrane integrity—which does not fully capture the complex physiology of bacterial dormancy.

The future of accurate VBNC detection lies in integrated, multi-parameter approaches. Combining flow cytometric analysis with molecular biology techniques like vPCR, metabolic activity probes, and robust resuscitation assays provides a more holistic and reliable strategy. As research continues to reveal the clinical and public health importance of the VBNC state, moving beyond a binary live/dead paradigm is essential. A method's limitations must be acknowledged, and the definition of "viability" must be refined to encompass the nuanced and dynamic nature of bacterial survival strategies.

The detection of viable microorganisms is a cornerstone of public health, food safety, and clinical diagnostics. Traditional culture-based methods fail to detect bacteria in the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state, a dormant condition induced by environmental stresses where cells are metabolically active but cannot grow on standard media. This omission presents a significant risk, as VBNC pathogens retain virulence and can resuscitate, posing a threat for disease outbreaks. Viability PCR (v-PCR) has emerged as a powerful culture-independent solution to this problem. This in-depth technical guide explores the core principles of v-PCR, focusing on the mastery of propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium monoazide (EMA) dyes for selective DNA amplification. Framed within broader research on VBNC detection, this whitepaper provides a detailed examination of the mechanism, optimization, and application of v-PCR, equipping researchers and drug development professionals with the protocols and knowledge to accurately distinguish and quantify viable microbial populations.

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state is a survival strategy adopted by numerous bacterial pathogens in response to adverse environmental conditions, such as extreme temperatures, nutrient starvation, disinfectants, and food processing stresses [19]. In this state, cells undergo physiological changes, including reduced metabolic activity and the inability to form colonies on routine culture media upon which they would typically grow. Critically, VBNC cells are not dead; they maintain membrane integrity and can resuscitate and regain cultivability when favorable conditions return, often with their pathogenicity intact [19] [28]. To date, over 85 bacterial species, including major foodborne pathogens like Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Campylobacter jejuni, have been documented to enter this state [19].

The persistence of VBNC pathogens introduces a severe blind spot in food safety and clinical testing. Conventional microbiological methods, which rely on cell culturing, inevitably return false-negative results for VBNC populations, leading to a dangerous underestimation of viable pathogen load and associated risk. For instance, VBNC cells of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica can be induced by chlorine sanitization in process wash water, potentially leading to cross-contamination of fresh produce [8]. Molecular methods like quantitative PCR (qPCR), while rapid and sensitive, amplify DNA from both live and dead cells, resulting in false-positive signals and an overestimation of viable, threatening cells [35] [9].

Viability PCR (v-PCR) was developed to bridge this critical technological gap. Also referred to as viability qPCR (v-qPCR), this method integrates a simple sample pre-treatment with photoreactive DNA-binding dyes before DNA extraction and amplification. The core principle is elegantly simple: these dyes selectively penetrate compromised membranes of dead cells, bind to their DNA, and permanently inhibit its PCR amplification. Consequently, the subsequent qPCR signal is predominantly derived from intact, viable cells, including those in the VBNC state [36] [37]. This technique provides a rapid, specific, and sensitive tool for the accurate assessment of microbial viability, revolutionizing monitoring in environmental, food, and clinical sectors.

Core Principles of Viability Dyes

Mechanism of Action: PMA and EMA

The functionality of v-PCR hinges on the distinct properties of two primary viability dyes: propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium monoazide (EMA).

• PMA (Propidium Monoazide): PMA is a cell membrane-impermeant, photo-reactive dye. Its molecule carries a positive charge, which prevents it from crossing the intact, hydrophobic lipid bilayers of live cells. However, in dead cells or cells with severely compromised membranes, the dye can readily enter. Once inside, PMA intercalates into double-stranded DNA. Upon exposure to intense visible light (∼465 nm), the azide group on PMA is converted to a highly reactive nitrene radical, which forms stable, covalent cross-links with the DNA backbone. This modification renders the DNA insoluble and, crucially, unamplifiable by DNA polymerase during PCR. The resulting signal suppression from dead cells allows for the selective amplification of DNA from viable cells [36] [38].

• EMA (Ethidium Monoazide): EMA operates on a similar principle as PMA; it is a photo-reactive DNA intercalator that is activated by light to covalently bind DNA and inhibit amplification [8]. However, a significant drawback of EMA is its smaller molecular size and potential to passively penetrate the membranes of some living bacterial cells, particularly those with active efflux pumps. This can lead to the suppression of PCR signals from live cells, thereby reducing the apparent viable count and increasing the rate of false negatives [8] [37].

PMAxx is a next-generation viability dye developed to overcome the limitations of both PMA and EMA. It is a superior alternative that offers improved live/dead discrimination by more effectively eliminating PCR amplification from dead cells, thereby minimizing false-positive results [36]. For applications requiring the highest fidelity, PMAxx is now the dye of choice.

Table 1: Comparison of Key Viability Dyes.

Dye	Mechanism	Key Advantage	Key Limitation
EMA	Enters dead cells, intercalates DNA, photo-activated crosslinking.	Well-documented in literature.	Can penetrate some live cells, potentially causing false negatives.
PMA	Membrane-impermeant; enters only dead cells with compromised membranes.	Better live/dead discrimination than EMA; reduced false negatives.	May not completely suppress all dead-cell DNA amplification.
PMAxx	Enhanced version of PMA; enters only dead cells.	Superior live/dead discrimination; most effective at eliminating dead-cell signals.	Higher cost than original PMA.

The Critical Link to VBNC Detection

The ability of PMA and PMAxx to differentiate based on membrane integrity is directly applicable to detecting VBNC cells. A defining characteristic of the VBNC state is an intact cell membrane, despite the cells' non-culturability [19]. Therefore, when a sample containing a mixture of culturable cells, VBNC cells, and dead cells is treated with PMA, the dye will only penetrate the dead cells. The DNA from both culturable and VBNC cells remains unmodified and is available for amplification. The resulting qPCR signal thus provides a measure of the total viable population, encompassing both culturable and VBNC cells. By comparing this v-PCR result with a standard plate count, researchers can estimate the proportion of VBNC cells in a sample [9]. This approach has been successfully validated for detecting VBNC states in pathogens such as Campylobacter jejuni [9] and Listeria monocytogenes [8].

The v-PCR Workflow and Protocol Optimization

Mastering v-PCR requires a thorough understanding of its workflow and the critical parameters that require optimization for different sample types. The following diagram and section detail the standardized procedure and key optimization points.

Detailed Experimental Protocol

The basic v-PCR workflow involves five key steps, as illustrated in Figure 1 [36] [9]:

• Dye Addition: Add the pre-optimized concentration of PMA, PMAxx, or EMA to the sample. For many bacterial applications, a final concentration of 20-100 μM is used, though this must be determined empirically [9].
• Incubation: Incubate the sample-dye mixture in the dark for 10-30 minutes. This allows the dye to diffuse into dead cells and intercalate with the DNA. The incubation is performed in the dark to prevent premature photoactivation.
• Photoactivation: Expose the sample to intense visible light (wavelength ∼465 nm) for 5-15 minutes using a dedicated LED photolysis device. This step activates the dye, causing it to form covalent bonds with the DNA. Devices like the PMA-Lite ensure uniform illumination for reliable results [36].
• DNA Extraction: Following photoactivation, extract genomic DNA from the sample using standard commercial kits or thermal treatment methods. The cross-linked DNA from dead cells is efficiently removed during extraction or is not amplifiable.
• qPCR Amplification and Analysis: Perform quantitative PCR using target-specific primers and probes. The resulting cycle threshold (Ct) values are inversely proportional to the amount of viable target DNA in the original sample.

Key Optimization Parameters for Robust Assays

A one-size-fits-all approach does not work for v-PCR. Several parameters require careful optimization to ensure maximum suppression of dead-cell signals while preserving signals from viable cells [37].

• Dye Concentration and Selection: The optimal dye concentration is matrix- and organism-dependent. While 20 μM may be sufficient for pure cultures of C. jejuni [9], complex samples like stool or food may require concentrations up to 200 μM [39] [8]. As discussed, PMAxx is generally preferred over PMA for its superior performance, and EMA should be used with caution [36] [8].

• Use of Enhancer for Gram-Negative Bacteria: The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria can be a barrier to dye penetration. Biotium offers a PMA Enhancer that improves the live/dead discrimination for Gram-negative strains by facilitating dye entry into dead cells without affecting viable cells [36]. It is compatible with both PMA and PMAxx.

• Sample Matrix Effects: The sample matrix is a major factor in assay performance. Opaque or complex samples like soil, feces, and certain foods can scatter light during photoactivation, reducing efficacy. Solutions include using higher dye concentrations, longer light exposure times, and sample dilution [36] [39]. For instance, a study on Salmonella in diarrheal stools found that using a 5% stool suspension minimized interference and provided the most accurate results compared to more concentrated suspensions [39].

• Photoactivation Device: Consistent and uniform light exposure is non-negotiable. Halogen lamps can cause overheating, while dedicated LED devices like the PMA-Lite 2.0 provide stable, cool, and uniform illumination, which is critical for reproducible results [36] [37].

Table 2: Optimization Guide for v-PCR Parameters.

Parameter	Typical Range	Influence on Assay	Optimization Tip
Dye Concentration	10 - 200 μM	Low concentration may not suppress all dead-cell DNA; too high may inhibit live-cell signal.	Perform a concentration gradient test with live/dead cell controls.
Incubation Time	5 - 30 min	Shorter time may not allow full dye penetration; longer time is often unnecessary.	Standardize at 15 min in the dark at room temperature as a starting point.
Light Exposure	5 - 15 min	Insufficient light leads to incomplete dye activation; overexposure can heat samples.	Use a dedicated LED device; 10 min is a common default.
Sample Concentration	Varies	High biomass can shield cells from light, reducing efficacy.	Dilute opaque samples (e.g., soil, stool) to reduce turbidity [39].

Applications in VBNC Pathogen Research

v-PCR has become an indispensable tool in uncovering the hidden world of VBNC pathogens. Its applications span across multiple fields, providing critical data where traditional methods fall short.

• Food Safety and Water Sanitation: The method is extensively used to monitor the efficacy of disinfectants and to detect VBNC pathogens in food and water. For example, research has used PMAxx combined with EMA to detect and quantify VBNC Listeria monocytogenes in chlorine-treated process wash water from the fresh produce industry, a scenario where culture plates showed no growth [8]. Similarly, v-PCR has been applied to detect VBNC E. coli O157:H7 on vegetables and Campylobacter jejuni in poultry [19] [9].

• Clinical Diagnostics: In the clinical realm, v-PCR offers a rapid method to assess pathogen viability in patient samples. A recent study developed a v-PCR assay using PMAxx to detect viable Salmonella Enteritidis in diarrheal stools, highlighting the impact of stool consistency and concentration on assay accuracy [39]. This demonstrates its potential as a diagnostic tool when culture confirmation is unavailable.

• Microbiome and Probiotic Research: In microbiome studies, distinguishing between live and dead members of the community is essential for understanding community dynamics and function. v-PCR, especially when coupled with next-generation sequencing (v-PCR-NGS), allows researchers to profile the active microbial population, excluding DNA from dead cells that may persist in the environment [36]. This is equally important in probiotic research for verifying the viability of microbial products.

• Environmental Monitoring: v-PCR is employed in environmental testing to assess the viability of microbes in soil, wastewater, and natural water bodies, providing a more accurate picture of microbial activity and potential health risks than culture-based or standard molecular methods [36] [35].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful implementation of v-PCR requires a set of specific reagents and instruments. The following table catalogues the essential components for setting up and performing a v-PCR experiment.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for v-PCR.

Item	Function / Description	Example Products / Notes
Viability Dye	Selective DNA intercalation in dead cells; inhibits PCR.	PMA, PMAxx (superior alternative), EMA [36] [38].
Photoactivation Device	Provides uniform, high-intensity visible light for dye activation.	PMA-Lite 2.0 (for tubes), Glo-Plate 2.0 (for microplates) [36].
qPCR Master Mix	Enzymes, buffers, and dNTPs for real-time PCR amplification.	Forget-Me-Not EvaGreen qPCR Master Mix; SYBR Green or probe-based mixes [36].
PMA Enhancer	Improves dye penetration into dead Gram-negative bacteria.	PMA Enhancer for Gram-Negative Bacteria, 5X Solution [36].
DNA Extraction Kit	Isolates pure genomic DNA after photoactivation.	Standard commercial kits (e.g., Presto Mini gDNA Bacteria Kit) or thermal lysis [9].
Strain-Specific Primers	For targeted amplification of the microbe of interest.	Validated primers for pathogens like S. enterica, L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 [36].
Viability PCR Kits	All-inclusive kits for specific applications.	Viability PCR Starter Kits (with/without Enhancer); Strain-specific v-PCR kits [36].

Viability PCR represents a significant leap forward in our ability to accurately monitor and quantify viable microorganisms, directly addressing the critical challenge posed by the VBNC state. The meticulous mastery of PMA and PMAxx dyes—through understanding their mechanisms and rigorously optimizing protocols for specific sample matrices—is fundamental to unlocking the full potential of this technology. As a rapid, sensitive, and culture-independent method, v-PCR is an powerful tool for researchers and professionals in drug development, food safety, and clinical diagnostics. Its continued adoption and refinement will undoubtedly lead to a more accurate assessment of microbial risks, ultimately contributing to improved public health outcomes and a deeper understanding of microbial physiology in diverse environments. Future developments, such as its integration with advanced sequencing technologies and digital PCR, will further solidify its role as an indispensable component of the modern microbiologist's toolkit.

Viability PCR (v-PCR) has emerged as a critical molecular tool for distinguishing live from dead bacterial cells, particularly for detecting pathogens in the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state that evade conventional culture-based methods. This technical guide provides a comprehensive overview of optimized v-PCR protocols utilizing PMAxx, a next-generation viability dye, within the broader context of VBNC detection research. We detail standardized methodologies for selective detection of viable cells, analyze key optimization parameters, and present advanced combinatorial approaches. Designed for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, this whitepaper synthesizes current experimental data and procedural recommendations to enhance assay precision, minimize false results, and expand applications in clinical diagnostics, food safety, and public health microbiology.

The reliable detection of viable microbial pathogens represents a persistent challenge across clinical diagnostics, food safety, and pharmaceutical development. Conventional culture methods, while considered the gold standard, fail to detect bacteria that have entered the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state—a dormant condition induced by environmental stressors where cells remain metabolically active but cannot form colonies on standard media [14] [40]. This limitation is particularly problematic for pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio species, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which can maintain virulence potential while in the VBNC state, posing significant undetected public health risks [14] [41] [40].

Molecular detection methods such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) offer rapid, sensitive pathogen identification but cannot differentiate DNA from live, dead, or VBNC cells, leading to potential false-positive results from non-viable organisms [42]. Viability PCR (v-PCR) addresses this fundamental limitation by integrating DNA intercalating dyes like propidium monoazide (PMA) and its superior alternative PMAxx with standard PCR amplification [36] [42]. These dyes selectively penetrate compromised membranes of dead cells, covalently bind to DNA upon photoactivation, and inhibit amplification, thereby ensuring that PCR signals primarily originate from intact, viable cells including those in the VBNC state [36] [43]. The optimization of v-PCR protocols, particularly using PMAxx and exploring combinatorial treatments, thus represents a critical advancement for accurate risk assessment of infectious diseases and microbial contamination across healthcare and industry sectors.

Core Principles of Viability PCR

Mechanism of Action

Viability PCR operates on a fundamental principle of selective membrane permeability. Viability dyes such as PMAxx are membrane-impermeant molecules that cannot cross intact cellular membranes of viable cells. However, in dead cells with compromised membrane integrity, these dyes readily penetrate and intercalate with double-stranded DNA. Upon exposure to high-intensity light, the azide group on PMAxx converts to a highly reactive nitrene radical that forms covalent cross-links with the DNA backbone [36] [43]. This photochemical modification creates a steric hindrance that blocks DNA polymerase activity during amplification, effectively preventing PCR detection of dead cells [36]. In contrast, DNA from viable cells with intact membranes remains unmodified and amplifies normally, enabling specific detection and quantification of live cells even in mixed populations containing high concentrations of dead cells [44] [42].

Comparative Dye Chemistry

The evolution of viability dyes has progressed from ethidium monoazide (EMA) to propidium monoazide (PMA) and finally to PMAxx, with each iteration offering improved performance characteristics. EMA, an early viability dye, demonstrates significant limitations due to its ability to partially penetrate intact cell membranes, leading to false-negative results by suppressing amplification from live cells [42] [43]. PMA offers improved membrane selectivity over EMA but does not completely eliminate PCR amplification from dead cells, potentially yielding false-positive signals [36] [43]. PMAxx represents a structurally optimized formulation that provides superior dead-cell DNA suppression while maintaining minimal impact on live-cell amplification [36] [42]. Recent research has also explored next-generation dye chemistries including psoralen-based compounds (MycoLight vPCR 350) requiring UV-A activation and light-independent, minor-groove-targeted reagents (MycoLight vPCR Star) that eliminate photoactivation requirements entirely [43].

Figure 1: Mechanism of Viability PCR with PMAxx. The diagram illustrates the differential dye penetration and subsequent PCR amplification outcomes between live cells with intact membranes and dead cells with compromised membranes.

Optimizing PMAxx Treatment Protocols

Critical Optimization Parameters

Successful implementation of PMAxx-vPCR requires systematic optimization of several interdependent parameters to maximize live/dead discrimination while minimizing both false-positive and false-negative results. The dye concentration must be sufficient to saturate all available DNA binding sites in dead cells without causing non-specific binding to live cells or creating a "hook effect" where excessive dye leads to reduced efficiency [42] [43]. Photoactivation conditions—including light intensity, spectral characteristics, exposure duration, and sample container geometry—must be standardized to ensure complete dye activation without generating inhibitory heat [36] [42]. Sample-related factors such as matrix composition, turbidity, and background microbiota can significantly impact dye performance and require protocol adjustments [44] [36]. Additional considerations include amplicon size selection, with longer targets typically providing better discrimination, and DNA extraction methods that minimize co-purification of potential PCR inhibitors [45] [42].

Table 1: Key Optimization Parameters for PMAxx-vPCR Protocols

Parameter	Optimal Range	Impact on Assay Performance	Validation Approach
PMAxx Concentration	50-100 μM	Higher concentrations improve dead cell suppression but may cause "hook effect" at excessive levels [42] [43]	Titration with heat-killed cells to find minimum concentration yielding complete suppression
Incubation Conditions	15-20 min in dark at room temperature with rotation	Ensures adequate dye distribution and membrane interaction before photoactivation [44] [42]	Compare ΔCt values between live and dead cells across incubation times
Photoactivation	15-20 min using dedicated LED device (460-470 nm)	Complete activation converts dye to DNA-binding form; insufficient light yields false positives [36] [42]	Test light penetration in sample matrix using dead cell controls
Sample Matrix Considerations	Dilution or pre-treatment for colored/turbid samples	Sample components can interfere with light penetration and dye efficiency [44] [36]	Spike recovery experiments with known ratios of live/dead cells
Amplicon Length	>200 bp, ideally 500-1000 bp	Longer targets provide more binding sites for dye, improving dead cell suppression [45] [14]	Compare discrimination efficiency with different primer sets

Standardized PMAxx Protocol for Gram-Negative Bacteria

The following optimized protocol has been validated for detection of viable Escherichia coli and related Gram-negative pathogens in complex matrices including whole blood and food samples [44] [42]:

• Sample Preparation: Centrifuge 1 mL of sample at 10,000 × g for 5 minutes. Resuspend pellet in 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For complex matrices like blood, add a eukaryotic cell lysis step using commercial red blood cell lysis solution (3:1 ratio) with 15-minute incubation at room temperature, followed by centrifugation and resuspension in PBS [44].

• PMAxx Treatment: Add PMAxx to sample to achieve final concentration of 50-100 μM. For Gram-negative bacteria, include PMA Enhancer according to manufacturer's recommendations (e.g., 1× final concentration) [36] [42]. Incubate in the dark for 15-20 minutes with continuous gentle mixing.

• Photoactivation: Place samples in a dedicated photolysis device (e.g., PMA-Lite 2.0 LED Photolysis Device) and expose to high-intensity blue light (460-470 nm) for 15-20 minutes. Keep samples on ice during illumination if heat buildup is concern [44] [36].

• DNA Extraction: Transfer photoactivated samples to fresh microcentrifuge tubes to minimize potential adsorption of dye to tube walls [42]. Extract DNA using standardized kit-based methods (e.g., QIAamp DNA Mini Kit) according to manufacturer's instructions.

• qPCR Amplification: Perform quantitative PCR using strain-specific primers and probes. Recommended thermal cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute [44] [42].

This protocol has demonstrated a lower limit of detection of 10² CFU/mL for E. coli in whole blood, with linear quantification ranging from 10² to 10⁸ CFU/mL (R² = 0.997) [44]. When properly optimized, the method can effectively discriminate between live and dead cells, with samples containing 50% live cells showing approximately 90% viability by vPCR, while samples with 0% live cells demonstrate less than 20% apparent viability [44].

Troubleshooting Common Optimization Challenges

Despite methodological standardization, v-PCR assays frequently encounter specific technical challenges that require targeted troubleshooting:

• Incomplete Dead Cell Suppression: If heat-killed controls continue to amplify after PMAxx treatment, increase dye concentration incrementally (up to 100 μM total), extend photoactivation time, or evaluate longer amplicon targets [45] [42]. For difficult-to-suppress Gram-negative species, ensure PMA Enhancer is included in the reaction [36].

• Reduced Live Cell Signal: Excessive suppression of live cell amplification may indicate dye toxicity or membrane damage from sample processing. Verify that viability dyes are not penetrating intact cells by testing live-only controls, reduce dye concentration if necessary, and ensure gentle handling of samples throughout processing [42] [43].

• Matrix Interference: Colored or turbid samples (e.g., blood, food homogenates) can scatter activation light and reduce dye efficiency. Implement sample dilution, filtration, or pre-treatment steps to clarify samples [44] [36]. For blood samples, the addition of a eukaryotic lysis step significantly improves performance by reducing background and improving light penetration [44].

• Tube Binding Effects: PMAxx can adhere to polypropylene tube walls during photoactivation and subsequently bind to DNA released from live cells during lysis, causing false-negative results. Transfer samples to fresh tubes after photoactivation but before DNA extraction to minimize this effect [42].

Advanced Applications: Digital PCR and VBNC Detection

Viability Digital PCR (v-dPCR) for Absolute Quantification

The integration of PMAxx with digital PCR (dPCR) technologies represents a significant advancement for absolute quantification of viable pathogens without requiring standard curves. Viability-dPCR (v-dPCR) partitions samples into thousands of individual reactions, enabling precise enumeration of target DNA molecules through Poisson statistical analysis [45] [46] [41]. This approach is particularly valuable for VBNC detection, where precise quantification at low concentrations is essential. For alcohol-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (HiAlc Kpn) in mouse fecal samples, PMA-dPCR successfully quantified viable cell reductions ranging from 0.64 to 1.13 log₁₀ DNA copies/mL during VBNC state induction [41]. The method demonstrated comparable performance across three different single-copy genes (KP, rpoB, and adhE), confirming technical robustness [41].

The critical advantage of dPCR in viability testing lies in its resistance to PCR inhibitors and ability to provide absolute quantification without reference standards, making it particularly suitable for complex sample matrices like feces, soil, and food products [45] [41]. When optimizing v-dPCR protocols, key considerations include reducing thermal cycle numbers (from 40 to 30 cycles) and targeting larger amplicon sizes (up to 966 bp) to improve discrimination between live and dead cells [45]. This approach has successfully detected Erwinia amylovora in plant cankers with a linear range of 10³ to 10⁷ CFU/mL [45].

Enhanced Detection of VBNC Pathogens

Viability PCR with PMAxx has demonstrated particular utility for detecting pathogens in the VBNC state, which evade traditional culture-based methods but remain potentially infectious. For Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae in seafood, optimized vPCR assays detected VBNC cells in 50-56% of retail samples that tested negative by culture-based methods [14]. These assays incorporated a proprietary DNA intercalating dye with detection of long gene fragments (groEL, 510 bp for V. parahaemolyticus; ompW, 588 bp for V. cholerae) to improve discrimination [14]. The methods showed exceptional sensitivity, detecting as few as 3.5 V. parahaemolyticus cells and 6.9 V. cholerae cells [14].

Table 2: VBNC Pathogen Detection Using Optimized v-PCR Methods

Pathogen	Sample Matrix	Target Gene(s)	Detection Limit	Application Findings
Escherichia coli	Whole blood	uidA	10² CFU/mL	Linear quantification from 10²-10⁸ CFU/mL; effective discrimination in mixed live/dead samples [44]
Klebsiella pneumoniae (HiAlc Kpn)	Mouse feces	KP, rpoB, adhE (single-copy genes)	-	Quantified VBNC formation and resuscitation; monitored antibiotic effects on VBNC state [41]
Vibrio parahaemolyticus	Seafood	groEL (510 bp)	3.5 cells	Detected VBNC cells in 50% of culture-negative retail samples [14]
Vibrio cholerae	Seafood	ompW (588 bp)	6.9 cells	Detected VBNC cells in 56% of culture-negative retail samples [14]
Erwinia amylovora	Plant cankers	-	10³ CFU/mL	Linear range of 10³-10⁷ CFU/mL; enabled study of pathogen survival in cankers [45]

Combinatorial EMA/PMAxx Approaches and Emerging Alternatives

Rationale for Combinatorial Treatments

While PMAxx alone typically provides sufficient live/dead discrimination for most applications, combinatorial approaches using multiple viability dyes may address specific technical challenges. The theoretical basis for combining EMA and PMAxx stems from their differential membrane penetration characteristics—EMA more readily penetrates cells with partially compromised membranes ("ghost cells") while PMAxx provides superior selectivity for intact versus fully compromised membranes [43] [40]. However, significant cautions apply to combinatorial approaches, as EMA's tendency to penetrate viable cells can cause substantial false-negative results [42] [43]. Recent systematic evaluations suggest that PMAxx alone, when properly optimized, generally outperforms EMA-containing combinations [42].

Next-Generation Viability Dyes

Emerging dye technologies offer promising alternatives to traditional phenanthridinium-azide compounds (PMA/EMA). Psoralen-based dyes (e.g., MycoLight vPCR 350) utilize different photochemistry (365 nm UV-A activation) and demonstrate reduced concentration-dependent "hook effects" compared to PMA [43]. In E. coli models, vPCR 350 (50 μM) with UV-A activation suppressed heat-killed cell amplification by 12.79 cycles (≈3.85 log₁₀), while minimally affecting live cells (+1.19 cycles), resulting in 11.60-cycle separation [43]. Light-independent, minor-groove-targeted reagents (e.g., MycoLight vPCR Star) eliminate photoactivation requirements entirely while maintaining effective dead-cell suppression [43]. These emerging chemistries may eventually overcome fundamental limitations of current PMAxx protocols, particularly for point-of-care applications where standardized photoactivation remains challenging.

Figure 2: Viability Dye Selection Strategy. The decision tree illustrates selection criteria for traditional and emerging viability dyes based on application requirements and technical considerations.

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents for v-PCR Optimization and Implementation

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function & Application Notes
Viability Dyes	PMAxx (Biotium #40069)	Next-generation viability dye with improved dead-cell discrimination; 20 mM aqueous solution [36] [42]
	PMA (Biotium #40019)	Original viability dye; validated across numerous applications but with less efficient dead-cell suppression [36]
Enhancer Reagents	PMA Enhancer for Gram-Negative Bacteria (Biotium #31038)	5× solution that improves dye penetration in Gram-negative species without affecting live cells [44] [36]
Photoactivation Devices	PMA-Lite 2.0 LED Photolysis Device	Uniform illumination for microcentrifuge tubes; optimized for PMAxx/PMA activation (460-470 nm) [36]
	PhotoLyst X100	Dual-wavelength device (365 nm & 465 nm) for compatibility with both traditional and next-generation dyes [43]
Strain-Specific Kits	PMAxx Real-Time PCR Bacterial Viability Kits (Biotium)	Complete systems for specific pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella, Listeria, etc.) including validated primers [36]
Sample Preparation	HostZERO Microbial DNA Kit (Zymo Research)	Eukaryotic cell lysis and host DNA depletion for complex samples like blood [44]
DNA Extraction	QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen)	Standardized silica-membrane based DNA purification post-PMAxx treatment [44] [42]

Optimized PMAxx viability PCR protocols represent a significant advancement in microbial viability detection, particularly for VBNC state pathogens that evade conventional culture-based methods. Through systematic optimization of dye concentration, photoactivation parameters, sample preparation methods, and amplicon selection, researchers can achieve robust discrimination between viable and non-viable cells across diverse applications. The integration of PMAxx with digital PCR platforms further enhances quantification capabilities, providing absolute enumeration of viable cells without standard curves. While combinatorial EMA/PMAxx approaches remain theoretically interesting for specific challenging samples, PMAxx alone generally provides superior performance when properly optimized. Emerging dye technologies, including psoralen-based and light-independent chemistries, offer promising avenues for future methodological improvements. As v-PCR technologies continue evolving, their implementation in clinical diagnostics, food safety monitoring, and pharmaceutical development will increasingly enable accurate risk assessment of viable pathogens that would previously escape detection using conventional methods.

The detection and characterization of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria represent a significant challenge in environmental microbiology, food safety, and clinical diagnostics. The VBNC state is a survival strategy adopted by many bacteria in response to adverse environmental conditions, wherein cells lose the ability to grow on routine culture media while maintaining viability and metabolic activity [47]. This state poses substantial public health risks as VBNC pathogenic bacteria retain virulence and can resuscitate under appropriate conditions, evading conventional detection methods that rely on cultivability [47] [48]. While membrane integrity staining has been widely used to assess viability, it provides limited information about the functional metabolic status of cells. This technical guide explores the integration of Direct Viable Count (DVC) methodology with advanced metabolic staining techniques to provide a more comprehensive assessment of bacterial metabolic activity beyond mere membrane integrity, offering researchers powerful tools for investigating the VBNC state in diverse scientific contexts.

Fundamental Principles: DVC and Metabolic Activity Detection

The Direct Viable Count (DVC) Methodology

The Direct Viable Count method, first developed by Kogure's group in 1979, enables enumeration of culturable and nonculturable cells based on their metabolic responsiveness to nutrients [49]. The fundamental principle involves incubating samples with a single antimicrobial agent (such as nalidixic acid) and nutrients (such as yeast extract). Nalidixic acid specifically inhibits DNA synthesis, preventing cell division without affecting other metabolic activities [49]. As a result, viable cells continue to metabolize nutrients and become elongated and/or fattened after incubation, allowing their differentiation from non-viable cells [49]. This method effectively discriminates cells that are responsive to added nutrients but in which division is inhibited, providing enumeration of all viable cells including those that are not culturable on routine media [50].

The original DVC method posed difficulties for application to complex bacterial communities, particularly in discriminating between elongated cells and normal cells, especially in samples with diverse bacterial sizes [49]. To overcome these limitations, an improved quantitative DVC (qDVC) procedure was developed that incorporates selective lysis of viable cells through spheroplast formation induced by incubation with antibiotics and glycine [49]. This glycine effect leads to swollen cells with loose cell walls that are easily lysed by a single freeze-thaw treatment, enabling quantitative assessment through cell counting before and after the lysis procedure [49].

Metabolic Staining Approaches

Metabolic staining techniques complement DVC by providing direct visualization of biochemical activities within bacterial cells. These approaches utilize various substrates and indicators to detect specific metabolic functions:

• Tetrazolium salt reduction: Methods utilizing compounds like MTT and WST-8 in Cell Counting Kit-8 measure cellular reduction potential. The WST-8 reagent is reduced by dehydrogenase activities in cells to produce a yellow-color formazan dye that is soluble in tissue culture media [51]. The amount of formazan dye generated is directly proportional to the number of living cells.

• Redox indicator conversion: Assays such as AlamarBlue employ resazurin, which is converted to the fluorescent and colorimetric reporter molecule resorufin in metabolically active cells [51]. This conversion provides both fluorescent and colorimetric signals proportional to metabolic activity.

• Enzyme-specific substrates: Stains targeting specific enzymatic activities, such as esterase measurements using fluorescein diacetate (FDA), provide insights into particular metabolic pathways [52].

• Radiolabeled substrate incorporation: Advanced methods incorporate radiolabeled substrates like [methyl-3H]thymidine or [U-14C]glutamic acid in microautoradiographic analyses to assess bacterial metabolic activity and substrate utilization at the single-cell level [50].

Advanced Detection Methods for VBNC State Characterization

Viability PCR (v-PCR) Techniques

Viability quantitative PCR (v-qPCR) has emerged as a powerful tool for detecting and quantifying VBNC cells by combining molecular detection with viability assessment. This approach utilizes photoreactive dyes such as propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium monoazide (EMA) to selectively inhibit PCR amplification from dead cells [8]. PMA penetrates only dead cells with compromised membranes and binds covalently to DNA upon photoactivation, preventing its amplification in subsequent PCR reactions [8]. EMA can diffuse across cell membranes using efflux pumps, offering complementary functionality [8]. The combination of both dyes (PMAxx, an improved version of PMA, and EMA) has proven particularly effective for differentiating dead and VBNC cells in complex matrices like process wash water in the food industry [8].

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has further advanced quantification capabilities by enabling absolute quantification without external standard curves. Recent research on alcohol-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae demonstrated that PMA-ddPCR using three single-copy genes (KP, rpoB, and adhE) provided robust quantification of VBNC cells [46] [41]. This method showed activity reductions ranging from 1.13 to 0.64 log10 DNA copies/mL in mice fecal samples and allowed absolute quantification of viable bacteria while maintaining resuscitation and ethanol production after antibiotic removal [41].

Metabolic Profiling of VBNC Cells

Comprehensive metabolic profiling has revealed significant alterations in VBNC cells compared to their culturable counterparts. Untargeted metabolomics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the VBNC state induced by chlorine stress demonstrated down-regulated metabolic activities in nucleotides, amino acids, peptidoglycans, and glutathione as a protective mechanism against stress [53]. Conversely, essential phospholipid synthesis was up-regulated to provide necessary carbon sources, and the glyoxylate cycle pathway activity increased while central carbon metabolic activity decreased [53]. Additionally, fatty acid metabolic activity was up-regulated, and lipids became the main energy storage substance in VBNC bacteria [53].

Isotope tracing coupled with Raman spectroscopy at the single-cell level has provided insights into metabolic differences in nucleic acid, protein, carbohydrate, and water metabolism of VBNC P. aeruginosa [53]. This approach enables the acquisition of metabolic fingerprints of individual VBNC cells, offering unprecedented resolution for characterizing metabolic heterogeneity within bacterial populations.

Table 1: Comparison of Key VBNC Detection Methods

Method	Principle	Advantages	Limitations
Direct Viable Count (DVC)	Cell elongation in response to nutrients with division inhibition	Enumerates culturable and nonculturable cells; relatively simple	Discrimination of elongated cells can be challenging in diverse communities
Quantitative DVC (qDVC)	Selective lysis of viable cells after spheroplast formation	Clear discrimination; quantitative results; works with diverse bacteria	Requires optimization for different bacterial types
Viability PCR (v-qPCR)	Selective DNA intercalation in dead cells preventing amplification	Specific, sensitive, quantitative; detects specific pathogens	Complex matrices may cause interference; requires optimization
Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)	Microdroplet partitioning with viability dye treatment	Absolute quantification without standards; high precision	Higher cost; specialized equipment needed
Metabolic Staining	Detection of specific enzymatic activities or redox states	Provides functional metabolic information; various targets	May not correlate with culturability; background in complex samples

Experimental Protocols and Methodological Guidelines

Quantitative Direct Viable Count (qDVC) Protocol

The qDVC procedure provides a reliable method for quantitative assessment of viable cells in complex samples [49]:

• Sample Preparation: Collect samples in sterile containers and process within 2 hours of collection. For environmental samples, appropriate dilution may be necessary.

• qDVC Incubation: Incubate samples in appropriate broth (e.g., twofold-diluted LB broth) containing:

  • Nalidixic acid (40 μg/ml for E. coli)
  • Glycine (2% wt/vol)
  • Incubate for 140 minutes at optimal growth temperature (37°C for E. coli) in the dark

• Selective Lysis: Subject samples to a single freeze-thaw treatment:

  • Freeze for 1 minute in liquid nitrogen
  • Thaw at room temperature (approximately 25°C)

• Cell Staining and Enumeration:

  • Stain with SYBR green I (1/10,000 dilution) for 5 minutes at room temperature
  • Filter through black polycarbonate filter (pore size: 0.2 μm)
  • Air dry filter and mount on glass slides with immersion oil
  • Count cells using epifluorescence microscope
  • Adjust bacterial number to approximately 50 cells per field of view
  • Count minimum of 1,000 cells per sample

• Calculation: Determine viable cell count using the formula:

  • Number of viable cells = Total cell number before qDVC incubation − Number of cells after freeze-thaw treatment following qDVC incubation

This protocol has been successfully adapted for various bacteria including Aeromonas hydrophila, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and environmental isolates with modifications to antibiotic concentrations and incubation conditions [49].

PMA-ddPCR Protocol for VBNC Quantification

For absolute quantification of VBNC cells using PMA-ddPCR [41]:

• PMA Treatment Optimization:

  • Test PMA concentrations between 5 μM and 200 μM
  • Optimize incubation time from 5 to 30 minutes in the dark
  • Use 650W double-ended halogen light source at 20cm distance for 15 minutes after incubation

• DNA Extraction:

  • Use standardized DNA extraction kits suitable for the sample matrix
  • Include controls for extraction efficiency

• Droplet Digital PCR Setup:

  • Prepare reaction mixture with primers targeting single-copy genes (e.g., KP, rpoB, adhE for K. pneumoniae)
  • Generate droplets using automated droplet generator
  • Perform PCR amplification with optimized cycling conditions
  • Analyze droplets using droplet reader

• Data Analysis:

  • Calculate copy numbers using Poisson statistics
  • Average results from multiple single-copy genes for improved accuracy
  • Include controls for PMA efficiency and background signal

This method has been validated for quantification of VBNC state formation and resuscitation in alcohol-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, demonstrating sensitivity to detect activity reductions and resuscitation events [41].

Diagram 1: PMA-ddPCR Workflow for VBNC Cell Quantification

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for DVC and Metabolic Staining

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Notes
Nalidixic Acid	DNA synthesis inhibitor in DVC	Prevents cell division while allowing metabolic activity; concentration varies by bacterial species (1-40 μg/mL)
Glycine	Cell wall weakening agent in qDVC	Promotes spheroplast formation for selective lysis; typically used at 2% (wt/vol) concentration
PMA/PMAxx	DNA intercalating dye for viability PCR	Penetrates compromised membranes of dead cells; concentration requires optimization (5-200 μM)
SYBR Green I	Nucleic acid staining for epifluorescence	Stains all cells for total counting; use at 1/10,000 dilution
MTT/WST-8 Reagents	Metabolic activity indicators	Reduced by dehydrogenase activities to formazan dyes; provides colorimetric signal proportional to viable cells
AlamarBlue (Resazurin)	Redox indicator	Converted to resorufin in metabolically active cells; provides fluorescent and colorimetric signals
Radiolabeled Substrates	Metabolic activity tracking	e.g., [3H]thymidine or [14C]glutamic acid for microautoradiography; requires specialized facilities

Metabolic Pathways and Regulatory Networks in VBNC Cells

Bacteria undergoing transition to the VBNC state exhibit significant metabolic reprogramming that enables survival under adverse conditions. Research using Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model organism has revealed consistent patterns of metabolic regulation in response to chlorine stress [53]:

• Nucleotide metabolism: Down-regulation of purine and pyrimidine metabolism pathways conserves energy and resources while maintaining essential functions.

• Amino acid metabolism: Reduced metabolic activities in amino acid synthesis and utilization, with particular down-regulation of glutamate metabolism, alanine, aspartate, and glycine metabolic pathways.

• Central carbon metabolism: General down-regulation of glycolysis and citrate cycle (TCA cycle) activities, with compensatory up-regulation of the glyoxylate cycle that allows utilization of simple carbon sources while bypassing CO2-producing steps.

• Energy metabolism: Shift toward lipid and fatty acid metabolism as primary energy sources, with up-regulation of fatty acid degradation and biosynthesis pathways.

• Stress response systems: Enhanced expression of antioxidant systems including glutathione metabolism and up-regulation of stress response proteins like peroxiredoxins.

These metabolic adaptations collectively enable VBNC cells to maintain basal metabolic activity while withstanding environmental stresses that would kill less adaptable bacteria.

Diagram 2: Metabolic Reprogramming in VBNC State Induction

Applications and Implications Across Research Fields

The integration of DVC methodology with metabolic staining approaches has significant implications across multiple research domains:

• Environmental monitoring: Detection and quantification of VBNC pathogenic bacteria in water treatment systems provides critical data for public health protection. Studies have revealed that most pathogenic bacteria in drinking water treatment plants exist in the VBNC state, with concentrations of 10¹-10² cells/100 mL persisting in final chlorinated water [48].

• Food safety: Optimization of detection methods for VBNC pathogens in process wash water and food products enables more accurate risk assessment. The combination of viability dyes with qPCR has proven particularly effective for complex food matrices [8].

• Clinical microbiology: Identification and quantification of VBNC pathogens in clinical samples, particularly for persistent infections, may explain treatment failures and disease recurrence. The PMA-ddPCR method offers sensitive detection of viable cells even when cultures are negative [41].

• Drug development: Assessment of antibiotic efficacy against VBNC populations provides more comprehensive evaluation of antimicrobial agents. Research has demonstrated that ciprofloxacin can inhibit resuscitation of VBNC cells while maintaining their potential for ethanol production after antibiotic removal [41].

The integration of Direct Viable Count methodology with advanced metabolic staining techniques represents a powerful approach for assessing bacterial metabolic activity beyond membrane integrity. These methods provide critical insights into the VBNC state, enabling more accurate risk assessment in environmental, food safety, and clinical contexts. The continuous refinement of these techniques, particularly through incorporation of molecular methods like viability PCR and droplet digital PCR, offers increasingly sensitive and specific detection of metabolically active but non-culturable bacteria. As understanding of the metabolic adaptations in VBNC cells improves, so too will the ability to detect, quantify, and control these persistent bacterial populations across diverse research and applied settings.

The viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state represents a critical survival strategy adopted by numerous bacterial pathogens, wherein cells remain metabolically active and potentially virulent but cannot form colonies on standard culture media, rendering them undetectable by conventional microbiological methods [5] [26]. This state, induced by sublethal environmental stresses such as antimicrobial exposure, nutrient deprivation, or other adverse conditions, poses a significant threat to public health, food safety, and clinical medicine by leading to false-negative diagnostic results and persistent, recalcitrant infections [28] [5]. The VBNC state has been documented in over 60 pathogenic species, including oral and foodborne pathogens like Porphyromonas gingivalis, Enterococcus faecalis, Helicobacter pylori, and Listeria monocytogenes [5] [54]. Effectively detecting these dormant cells is thus paramount for accurate risk assessment and intervention.

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) microscopy has emerged as a powerful, label-free technique capable of addressing this diagnostic blind spot. Unlike standard microscopy or culture, HSI captures a complete spectrum for each pixel in an image, generating a detailed datacube that contains both spatial and rich spectral information [55]. This allows for the identification of unique spectral "fingerprints" associated with subtle changes in cellular composition and physiology—precisely the kind of alterations that characterize the VBNC state [28]. When combined with artificial intelligence (AI), specifically deep learning models, HSI transforms into a rapid, automated, and highly accurate platform for classifying microbial states without the need for staining, lengthy enrichments, or complex sample preparation [28] [56] [57]. This whitepaper explores the integration of AI-enabled HSI as a transformative methodology for the rapid, label-free detection and classification of VBNC cells.

Hyperspectral Imaging: Fundamental Principles and System Design

The Hyperspectral Datacube and Acquisition Modalities

A core concept in HSI is the hyperspectral cube (HS cube), a three-dimensional dataset (x, y, λ) that contains one full spectral dimension for every spatial pixel in a two-dimensional image [55]. This rich dataset enables the quantitative assessment of tissue and cellular properties based on their intrinsic absorption and scattering characteristics, which serve as a spectral fingerprint [55].

There are three primary methods for acquiring HSI data, each with distinct advantages for live cell imaging:

• Spatial Scanning (Point-scanning or Line-scanning): These "Whiskbroom" or "Pushbroom" methods capture the complete spectrum for a single point or line of pixels at a time, scanning across the field of view. They typically cannot provide a live display [55].
• Spectral Scanning (Wavelength-scanning): This wide-field method captures the entire scene at a single wavelength band in one exposure, then sequentially steps through each wavelength using tunable filters like Liquid Crystal Tunable Filters (LCTFs) or Acousto-Optic Tunable Filters (AOTFs) [57] [55]. It achieves high spectral resolution but may have longer acquisition times.
• Snapshot Imaging: This approach captures the entire 3D datacube in a single exposure without scanning, enabling real-time HSI. It uses image-diversion elements or mosaic filter arrays (similar to a Bayer filter but for multiple wavelengths) on the sensor [56] [55]. While promising for real-time applications, current systems can trade off spatial or spectral resolution.

For dynamic biological samples like living cells, snapshot HSI integrated with microfluidic platforms is particularly advantageous as it eliminates motion artifacts from scanning and allows for high-throughput, real-time classification [56].

Key System Components

A typical HSI microscopy system consists of several core components. The foundation is a standard optical microscope. A tunable wavelength selection device, such as an LCTF or a Fabry-Pérot interferometer-based snapshot sensor, is integrated into the optical path [56] [57]. A high-sensitivity camera, often a CCD or sCMOS sensor, captures the images. A controlled light source provides illumination, with a shortpass filter sometimes used to block unwanted long-wavelength light [57]. Finally, specialized software is required for data acquisition, processing, and the subsequent analysis of the complex hyperspectral datacubes.

AI Integration: From Spectral Data to Classification

The Workflow from Image Acquisition to AI Classification

The process of AI-enabled classification begins with acquiring hyperspectral images of cells, which can include both normal and VBNC states induced by specific stressors [28]. The high-dimensional datacube is then processed, often by extracting pseudo-RGB images constructed from three characteristic spectral wavelengths that maximize the contrast between cell states [28]. Alternatively, the full spectral data per pixel can be used. These images or spectral arrays serve as the input for a deep learning model, typically a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The CNN is trained on labeled datasets to learn the intricate spatial and spectral features that distinguish different cell types or states. Once trained, the model can automatically and accurately classify new, unlabeled data.

Advanced Deep Learning Architectures for HSI

EfficientNetV2 has been successfully applied to classify VBNC E. coli, achieving a remarkable 97.1% accuracy by using a compound scaling method to efficiently capture fine-grained morphological features from pseudo-RGB images [28] [58]. 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (3D-CNNs) are uniquely suited for HSI data as they can convolve simultaneously across spatial and spectral dimensions, leveraging the full information content of the datacube for tasks like leukemia cell classification [56]. To address the challenge of variability in imaging conditions (e.g., different microscopes, magnifications), Domain Adaptation techniques such as Domain-Adversarial Neural Networks (DANNs) can be employed. These models learn domain-invariant features, significantly improving classification accuracy when applying a model trained on ideal "source domain" data to variable "target domain" data, such as brightfield images or lower magnification [58].

Experimental Protocols for VBNC Detection

Protocol 1: Inducing and Confirming the VBNC State

Objective: To induce the VBNC state in a bacterial population and confirm its establishment before HSI analysis. Materials: Bacterial strain (e.g., Escherichia coli K-12), appropriate growth broth and agar, antimicrobial stressors (e.g., 0.01% hydrogen peroxide, 0.001% peracetic acid), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), live/dead viability staining kit (e.g., based on propidium monoazide), equipment for plate counting [28] [54]. Methodology:

• Culture Preparation: Grow the bacterial strain to the mid-logarithmic phase in a suitable broth.
• Stress Induction: Expose the bacterial culture to a low concentration of the selected antimicrobial stressor in a nutrient-limited medium such as sterile distilled water or artificial seawater. Incubate for a defined period (e.g., 3 days at 4°C) [28] [54].
• VBNC Confirmation:
  • Culturability Test: Perform serial dilutions and plate on non-selective agar. Incubate and enumerate colony-forming units (CFU). A significant drop in CFU (e.g., to 0 CFU) indicates a loss of culturability [28].
  • Viability Test: Use a live/dead staining method. A sample with high viability count (e.g., via fluorescence microscopy) but zero culturability is confirmed to be in the VBNC state [28] [26].

Protocol 2: HSI and AI-Based Classification of VBNC Cells

Objective: To acquire hyperspectral images of VBNC and normal cells and train a deep learning model for their classification. Materials: Laboratory strain of VBNC and normal/culturable cells, inverted microscope, HSI system (e.g., with LCTF or snapshot camera), soft tryptic soy agar plates, computational resources (GPU workstation), Python with deep learning libraries (e.g., TensorFlow, PyTorch) [28] [58]. Methodology:

• Sample Preparation: Spot and incubate the bacterial suspension on soft agar plates for 3-5 hours to form microcolonies suitable for imaging [58].
• HSI Data Acquisition: Mount the plate on the HSI microscope. Acquire hyperspectral datacubes for multiple fields of view containing both VBNC and normal cells. For a spectral scanning system, this involves capturing 2D images at multiple sequential wavelengths (e.g., 25-63 bands) [28] [57].
• Data Preprocessing: Extract pseudo-RGB images by selecting three optimal spectral wavelengths that differentiate the cell states. Alternatively, use the full spectral data. Split the image data into training and testing sets [28].
• Model Training and Validation: Train a CNN architecture (e.g., EfficientNetV2) on the training set. Validate the model's performance using the testing set by evaluating metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall. The model trained on pseudo-RGB images has been shown to outperform models using standard RGB images, achieving over 97% accuracy [28].

Performance Data and Comparative Analysis

Table 1: Performance of AI-HSI in Various Cell Classification Studies

Cell Type / State	AI Model	Key Performance Metric	Experimental Notes	Source
VBNC E. coli	EfficientNetV2	97.1% classification accuracy	Used pseudo-RGB images from HSI; outperformed RGB model (83.3%)	[28]
Four Leukemia Cell Types	3D-CNN	High classification accuracy	Snapshot HSI with microfluidics; label-free, real-time	[56]
Neurons & Glia	Pixel-wise Machine Learning	88% object classification accuracy, 94% average precision	4-class label-free classification in neural stem cell cultures	[57]
Six Foodborne Bacteria	DANN (EfficientNetV2)	Accuracy improved by up to 54.5% in target domains	Demonstrated robustness across different microscopes & magnifications	[58]

Table 2: The Scientist's Toolkit - Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Item	Function / Application	Example Usage in Protocol
Liquid Crystal Tunable Filter (LCTF)	Wavelength selection device for spectral-scanning HSI.	Integrated with a microscope to acquire images at specific, sequential wavelengths [57].
Fabry-Pérot Snapshot HSI Sensor	Core filtering mechanism for snapshot-based HSI systems.	Built into a CMOS sensor to acquire a full hyperspectral datacube in a single exposure [56].
Soft Tryptic Soy Agar (0.7%)	Medium for cultivating bacterial microcolonies for imaging.	Used in petri dishes to grow 3-5 hour microcolonies for high-resolution HSI [58].
Propidium Monoazide (PMA)	Fluorescent dye for viability staining; penetrates only dead cells.	Used in combination with other stains or qPCR to differentiate viable cells in a population [54].
Microfluidic Chip (PDMS)	Platform for high-throughput, single-cell analysis.	Integrated with snapshot HSI to flow and image individual leukemia cells for classification [56].
Domain-Adversarial Neural Network (DANN)	AI model designed to generalize across different imaging domains.	Trained on ideal phase-contrast images (source) to classify cells in brightfield images (target) [58].

Discussion and Future Perspectives

AI-enabled HSI represents a paradigm shift in detecting the VBNC state, moving from reliance on indirect viability indicators and lengthy culturing to a direct, rapid, and label-free method that leverages subtle phenotypic fingerprints. The integration of snapshot HSI with microfluidics is particularly promising for real-time, high-throughput screening in clinical and industrial settings [56]. Furthermore, domain adaptation techniques are crucial for transforming these advanced systems from robust laboratory tools into practical solutions that can perform accurately across the varied and often suboptimal conditions found in resource-limited or point-of-care environments [58].

Future developments will likely focus on creating fully integrated and automated systems, expanding comprehensive spectral libraries for diverse pathogenic species, and exploring the resuscitation dynamics of VBNC cells in real time. As these technologies mature, AI-enabled HSI is poised to become an indispensable tool in the ongoing effort to overcome the significant challenges posed by dormant, non-culturable bacteria in public health, food safety, and clinical diagnostics.

Navigating Analytical Pitfalls: Optimizing VBNC Detection in Complex Matrices

Matrix interference presents a formidable challenge in analytical chemistry, particularly when detecting the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state in bacteria. The VBNC state is a dormant survival strategy adopted by numerous bacterial species when exposed to environmental stresses, wherein cells remain metabolically active and potentially pathogenic but cannot form visible colonies on conventional growth media—the very foundation of standard microbiological detection methods [5] [23]. This combination creates a perfect storm for diagnostic accuracy: matrix components obscure analytical signals while VBNC pathogens evade cultivation-based detection, leading to false negatives and potentially severe public health consequences.

The core of the problem lies in the complex chemical composition of biological samples. Matrix effects occur when compounds co-extracted with the analyte interfere with the detection process. In liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), for instance, matrix components can cause ion suppression or enhancement, altering signal intensity and compromising quantitative accuracy [59]. Similarly, natural pigments in plant-derived foods compete for excitation light and emit background fluorescence, while excess fats and proteins can coat instrumentation and degrade performance [60] [61]. These challenges are particularly pronounced in VBNC detection, where target cells are already present at low concentrations and must be distinguished from a background of complex sample constituents.

Understanding and overcoming matrix interference is thus fundamental to advancing VBNC state detection methods. Without robust strategies to mitigate these effects, even the most sensitive detection technologies may fail to identify dormant pathogens in food, water, and clinical samples, leaving significant risks undetected.

Fundamental Mechanisms of Matrix Interference

Matrix interference stems from the diverse chemical components found in complex samples, which can adversely affect analytical measurements through multiple mechanisms. Understanding these fundamental processes is essential for developing effective mitigation strategies, particularly when targeting challenging analytes like VBNC bacteria.

Primary Interference Mechanisms

• Ionization Competition: In mass spectrometry, matrix components co-eluting with the analyte can compete for available charges during the ionization process, leading to either signal suppression or enhancement. This occurs because the ionization capacity in the interface is limited; when excessive matrix compounds are present, they reduce the ionization efficiency of the target analytes [59]. Compounds with high mass, polarity, and basicity are particularly prone to causing these effects.

• Physical Interference: Less-volatile compounds may affect the efficiency of droplet formation in electrospray ionization, reducing the ability of charged droplets to convert into gas-phase ions [59]. High viscosity interfering compounds can increase the surface tension of charged droplets, further reducing evaporation efficiency. In spectroscopic methods, matrix components may cause light scattering or absorbance, competing with the probe's excitation light and leading to false readings [61] [62].

• Biological Interference: In enzyme-based detection methods like ELISA, matrix components can interfere at multiple stages: antigen-antibody binding, antibody-enzyme conjugate binding, or the enzymatic reaction itself [62]. Chlorophyll, plant proteins, and soluble sugars have all been shown to significantly compromise assay accuracy through these mechanisms.

Sample-Specific Challenges

The nature and extent of matrix effects vary considerably across sample types, each presenting unique challenges:

Table 1: Matrix Interference Profiles Across Sample Types

Sample Type	Major Interfering Components	Primary Interference Mechanisms	Impact on VBNC Detection
Plant-Derived Foods	Chlorophyll, lutein, lycopene, anthocyanins [61]	Light absorption/emission, enzyme inhibition [62]	Masks fluorescence signals, reduces assay sensitivity
Animal-Derived Foods	Fats, proteins, carbohydrates [60]	Ionization competition, instrument fouling	Suppresses target signals, increases background noise
Environmental Water	Dissolved organic carbon, turbidity, variable ionic composition [63]	Ion suppression, variable enrichment efficiency	Causes false negatives in molecular detection
Clinical Specimens	Proteins, lipids, metabolites, medications	Ionization competition, non-specific binding	Obscures low-abundance targets, reduces recovery

The implications of these interference effects are particularly significant for VBNC detection. Since VBNC cells are already challenging to detect due to their dormancy and reduced metabolic activity, matrix effects can further reduce detection sensitivity, potentially allowing dangerous pathogens to go undetected in monitoring programs.

Analytical Techniques and Methodologies

Advanced analytical techniques form the cornerstone of modern VBNC detection, yet each methodology faces unique challenges from matrix interference. Understanding these techniques and their limitations is crucial for developing robust detection protocols.

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS)

LC-MS has become the predominant analytical method for quantitative determination of analytes in biological matrices due to its high specificity, sensitivity, and throughput [59]. However, it remains highly vulnerable to matrix effects. The primary mechanism involves co-eluting compounds affecting ionization efficiency in the mass spectrometer interface. As Gavin Fischer, Vice President of Chromatography at PerkinElmer, explains: "Mass specs generally don't like all of the long fats or anything that smells," highlighting how naturally occurring compounds present serious obstacles for routine and high-throughput LC-MS/MS workflows [60].

Key mitigation strategies for LC-MS include:

• Improved instrumentation design with advanced front-end sources that prevent contaminants from entering the instrument [60]
• Protective curtain gases that block large molecules and aerosols from entering the detector [60]
• Easy-clean designs with accessible components for quick maintenance instead of major teardown procedures [60]
• Sample dilution to reduce matrix component concentration, though this must be balanced against sensitivity requirements [59]

Viable Quantitative PCR (vqPCR) for VBNC Detection

vqPCR represents a significant advancement for detecting VBNC cells by combining DNA intercalating dyes with amplification of longer gene fragments. This approach allows differentiation between viable cells (with intact membranes) and dead cells, crucial for accurate VBNC assessment [14] [15].

Table 2: vqPCR Assays for Major Foodborne VBNC Pathogens

Pathogen	Target Gene	Amplicon Length	Sensitivity	Matrix Applications
V. parahaemolyticus	groEL	510 bp	20 fg DNA = 3.5 cells [14]	Seafood, environmental water
V. cholerae	ompW	588 bp	30 fg DNA = 6.9 cells [14]	Water, seafood
L. monocytogenes	Multiple targets	Varies	Strain-dependent [23]	Dairy, meat, produce

The established vqPCR methods have demonstrated capability to detect VBNC pathogens in up to 50-56% of retail samples that were initially false-negative in culture-based tests, highlighting their significant advantage over conventional methods [15].

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

While less commonly applied directly to VBNC detection, ELISA faces substantial matrix interference challenges that are instructive for understanding biological recognition-based methods. A recent study deconstructed parathion ELISA into three critical steps to investigate interference mechanisms:

• Antigen-antibody binding
• Antibody-IgG-HRP binding
• HRP-catalyzed reaction [62]

The research found that vegetable matrices caused significant interference, with the antibody-IgG-HRP binding being subject to the most pronounced effects. Chlorophyll and plant proteins were identified as major interfering components, with matrix interference index (Im) values of 16-26% in untreated samples [62].

Emerging and Specialized Techniques

Upconversion Nanoparticles: A novel approach to overcome pigment interference utilizes lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) that convert near-infrared excitation into visible emissions. This strategy effectively circumvents interference from natural pigments through NIR excitation (808 nm) and upconverted red emission (655 nm), eliminating inner filter effects and autofluorescence [61]. This technology has achieved impressive sensitivity for glyphosate detection (LOD of 19.01 nM) even in heavily pigmented matrices [61].

Multivariate Curve Resolution: For complex matrices, chemometric approaches like Multivariate Curve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS) can address matrix effects by assessing the matching between unknown samples and calibration sets. This method systematically evaluates both spectral and concentration matching to minimize matrix effects and improve prediction accuracy [64].

Experimental Protocols for VBNC Detection and Matrix Interference Assessment

Robust experimental design is essential for reliable VBNC detection in complex matrices. The following protocols provide detailed methodologies for assessing matrix effects and detecting VBNC cells across various sample types.

vqPCR Protocol for VBNC Vibrio Species in Seafood

Sample Preparation:

• Homogenize 25 g seafood sample with 225 mL alkaline saline peptone water
• Incubate at 37°C for 12-16 hours for enrichment
• Centrifuge 1 mL aliquot at 12,000 × g for 5 minutes
• Resuspend pellet in 1 mL PBS for DNA extraction [14]

VBNC Induction Control:

• Start with 7.3 Log10 viable Vibrio cells/mL
• Treat with solution containing 0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 and 0.2 M ammonium carbonate
• Incubate for 1 hour at room temperature
• Verify VBNC state by loss of culturability on TCBS agar with retention of viability markers [15]

vqPCR Assay:

• DNA Treatment: Combine sample with proprietary DNA intercalating dye (Reagent D) to inhibit amplification from dead cells
• PCR Reaction:
  • Template DNA: 5 μL
  • Primer sets: groEL (V. parahaemolyticus) or ompW (V. cholerae)
  • Reaction volume: 25 μL
  • Cycling conditions: 95°C for 5 min; 40 cycles of 95°C/30s, 60°C/30s, 72°C/1 min
• Analysis: Use standard curve for quantification, with confirmation of VBNC state via viability dyes [14] [15]

Matrix Effect Assessment in LC-MS

Post-Extraction Addition Method:

• Prepare blank matrix sample using appropriate extraction procedure
• Spike with target analyte at known concentration post-extraction
• Compare signal response with equivalent standard in neat solvent
• Calculate matrix effect (ME) using formula: ME (%) = (Peak area of post-spiked sample / Peak area of standard in solvent) × 100% [59]

Post-Column Infusion Method:

• Infuse constant flow of analyte into HPLC eluent via T-connector
• Inject blank matrix extract onto chromatographic system
• Monitor signal response for suppression/enhancement regions
• Modify chromatographic conditions to shift analyte retention away from interference regions [59]

Matrix Interference Assessment in ELISA

Stepwise Interference Deconstruction:

• Antigen-Antibody Binding Assessment:
  • Immobilize complete antigen on 96-well plate
  • Block with 2% BSA
  • Incubate with antibody mixed with matrix components
  • Add IgG-HRP conjugate and substrate
  • Measure absorbance and calculate Im value [62]

• Antibody-IgG-HRP Binding Assessment:

  • Immobilize antibody on plate
  • Block with 2% BSA
  • Incubate with IgG-HRP mixed with matrix components
  • Add substrate and measure absorbance [62]

• HRP Catalytic Activity Assessment:

  • Immobilize IgG-HRP on plate
  • Incubate with matrix components
  • Add substrate and measure enzymatic activity [62]

Matrix Interference Index Calculation: Im (%) = |ODsolvent - ODtest| / ODsolvent × 100 Where ODsolvent is absorbance of control and OD_test is absorbance with matrix components [62]

Data Presentation and Visualization

Effective visualization of experimental data and conceptual relationships enhances understanding of complex matrix interference phenomena and their impact on VBNC detection.

Workflow Visualization

Matrix Interference Assessment Workflow: This diagram illustrates the systematic approach to characterizing, assessing, and mitigating matrix effects in VBNC detection.

VBNC Detection Methods Comparison

Table 3: Comparison of VBNC Detection Method Performance in Complex Matrices

Detection Method	Principle	Matrix Tolerance	Limit of Detection	Throughput	Cost
Culture-Based Methods	Growth on selective media	Low (direct interference)	≥ 10^4 CFU/mL [23]	Low (days)	Low
vqPCR	DNA intercalating dyes + long amplicons	Medium (requires cleanup)	3.5-6.9 cells [14]	High (hours)	Medium
Flow Cytometry	Membrane integrity + metabolic activity	Low (background particles)	10^3-10^4 cells/mL	Medium	High
Upconversion Nanoparticles	NIR excitation + visible emission	High (avoids pigment interference)	19 nM (small molecules) [61]	Medium	High
Microscopy with Viability Stains	Cellular integrity + enzymatic activity	Low (autofluorescence)	10^4 cells/mL	Low	Medium

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for Matrix Interference Management

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function	Application Notes
DNA Intercalating Dyes	Propidium monoazide, EMA, Reagent D [14] [15]	Selective amplification from viable cells	Critical for vqPCR; requires optimization for each matrix
Isotope-Labeled Internal Standards	Creatinine-d3, 13C/15N-labeled analogs [59] [63]	Compensation for ionization effects	Ideal but expensive; limited availability
Matrix Matching Standards	Artificial urine, simulated soil extracts, fortified blank matrices [64]	Calibration curve preparation	Must mimic chemical and physical properties
Extraction Sorbents	Oasis HLB, Isolute ENV+, Supelclean ENVI-Carb [63]	Selective analyte isolation	Multilayer SPE effective for diverse contaminants
Enzyme Substrates	TMB, pNPP, AMPPD [62]	Signal generation in ELISA	Susceptible to matrix inhibition; requires validation

Advanced Mitigation Strategies and Future Directions

As the challenges of matrix interference in VBNC detection continue to evolve, advanced mitigation strategies and emerging technologies offer promising avenues for improved analytical accuracy and reliability.

Instrumental and Computational Approaches

Innovative LC-MS/MS Design: Modern instrumentation incorporates several features specifically designed to handle matrix-heavy samples. These include advanced front-end sources that prevent contaminants from entering the instrument, protective curtain gases that block large molecules and aerosols, and easy-clean designs that allow quick maintenance without major teardown procedures [60]. As Gavin Fischer explains, "We want to remove the black arts from LC-MS/MS," emphasizing that instruments should run reliably with minimal human intervention [60].

Multivariate Curve Resolution with Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS): This chemometric approach addresses matrix effects by assessing the matching between unknown samples and calibration sets. By systematically evaluating both spectral and concentration matching, MCR-ALS identifies optimal calibration sets that minimize matrix effects, significantly improving prediction accuracy compared to traditional global calibration models [64].

Individual Sample-Matched Internal Standard (IS-MIS) Normalization: Particularly effective for heterogeneous samples like urban runoff, this novel strategy involves analyzing samples at multiple relative enrichment factors (REFs) as part of the analytical sequence. IS-MIS consistently outperforms established correction methods, achieving <20% RSD for 80% of features compared to only 70% with conventional internal standard matching using pooled samples [63].

Sample Preparation Innovations

Simplified Preparation Protocols: There is a growing trend toward streamlined sample preparation that reduces manual steps while maintaining effective matrix removal. For many applications, simple filtration or centrifugation may be sufficient when coupled with robust instrumentation, significantly reducing solvent use and disposables while aligning with sustainability goals [60].

Acid Treatment for Pigment-Rich Matrices: For vegetable matrices, acetic acid treatment has proven effective at reducing interference. Studies demonstrate that matrix interference index (Im) values significantly decrease after acetic acid treatment (from 16-26% to 10-13%), with spiked recovery experiments yielding satisfactory average recovery rates of 80-113% as matrix interference is minimized [62].

Future Directions: Automation and AI

The future of matrix interference management lies in increased automation and artificial intelligence. Fischer envisions "a future where the instrument automatically primes pumps, checks baseline stability, and flags suspicious data," with routine QC checks and repetitive tasks delegated to AI-driven software [60]. Such systems would reduce variability, save time, and lower labor costs while improving detection reliability.

For VBNC detection specifically, the integration of multiple verification methods—combining molecular detection with viability markers and metabolic activity assessment—will be crucial for accurate identification of dormant pathogens in complex matrices. The development of standardized protocols for VBNC induction and detection across different bacterial species and sample types remains an important goal for the field [23].

Matrix interference presents significant challenges across food, water, and clinical samples, particularly when detecting pathogens in the viable but non-culturable state. Through a combination of advanced instrumentation, strategic sample preparation, sophisticated data analysis techniques, and appropriate internal standardization, these challenges can be effectively mitigated. The continuing development of innovative approaches—including upconversion nanoparticles, multivariate curve resolution, and AI-driven automation—promises further improvements in our ability to accurately detect VBNC pathogens in even the most complex matrices. As these technologies evolve, they will enhance food safety, environmental monitoring, and clinical diagnostics, ultimately providing greater protection against the hidden threats posed by dormant bacterial populations.

The accurate distinction between live and dead bacterial cells represents a fundamental challenge in microbiology, particularly within diagnostic and therapeutic development contexts. Conventional quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) amplifies DNA from both viable and dead cells, leading to a significant overestimation of live bacteria and potentially compromising the evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy [65]. This "intact membrane dilemma" is further complicated by the bacterial survival strategy known as the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state, where metabolically active pathogens evade detection by standard culture methods while retaining virulence potential [5]. The VBNC state, defined by decelerated growth and reduced metabolic activity without loss of membrane integrity, enables bacteria to withstand antibiotic treatments and environmental stresses, contributing to chronic infections and antimicrobial treatment failures [5]. This review examines current methodological approaches for resolving this diagnostic dilemma, with particular focus on viability PCR (vPCR) technologies that selectively target intact cells while addressing the challenges posed by VBNC populations.

Core Methodological Approaches: From Culture to Molecular Viability Testing

The Gold Standard and Its Limitations

Culture-based methods, particularly colony forming unit (CFU) counts, remain the reference standard for quantifying viable bacterial cells in environmental, food, and clinical samples [65]. These methods provide direct evidence of cellular replication but suffer from significant limitations, including lengthy incubation periods (typically 24-48 hours) and the fundamental inability to detect VBNC populations [5] [15]. The cultural bias inherent in these methods overlooks numerous fastidious and non-cultivable species, potentially missing substantial portions of microbial communities relevant to clinical outcomes.

Viability PCR: Principle and Mechanism

Viability PCR (vPCR) has emerged as a culture-independent approach that combines the speed and sensitivity of molecular detection with selective analysis of intact cells. This method utilizes DNA intercalating dyes like propidium monoazide (PMA) and PMAxx that penetrate only membrane-compromised (dead) cells [65] [66]. The fundamental mechanism involves three critical steps:

• Dye incubation with the sample in the dark
• Photoactivation using intense visible light
• DNA extraction and qPCR amplification

Upon photoactivation, these dyes form covalent bonds with DNA, rendering it insoluble and preventing amplification in subsequent PCR reactions [65]. Consequently, only DNA from viable cells with intact membranes undergoes amplification, theoretically enabling specific quantification of live bacteria [66]. The critical distinction between vPCR and conventional qPCR lies in this selective exclusion of dead cell DNA, directly addressing the overestimation problem inherent to standard molecular methods.

Table 1: Comparison of Bacterial Viability Assessment Methods

Method	Principle	Detection Time	Detects VBNC?	Key Limitations
Culture/CFU Counting	Cellular replication on growth media	24-48 hours	No	Misses non-cultivable species; lengthy process
Conventional qPCR	DNA amplification from all cells	2-4 hours	Yes (if DNA intact)	Cannot distinguish live/dead cells; overestimates viability
Viability PCR (vPCR)	Selective DNA amplification from membrane-intact cells	3-6 hours	Yes	Optimization challenges; potential false positives/negatives
Flow Cytometry	Membrane integrity & enzymatic activity	1-2 hours	Potentially	Expensive equipment; requires expertise

Experimental Protocols: Optimizing vPCR for Accurate Detection

Standard PMA-qPCR Protocol for Oral Biofilm Analysis

Research on multispecies oral biofilms has established a robust PMA-qPCR protocol for quantifying viable cells. The methodology encompasses the following steps [65]:

• Sample Preparation: Grow five-species oral biofilms (Actinomyces oris, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mutans, and Veillonella dispar) on hydroxyapatite discs for 64 hours. Expose to antimicrobial agents (e.g., 0.2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite).

• PMA Treatment: Add PMA to samples at optimal concentration (typically 50-100 μM) and incubate in the dark for 20-30 minutes to allow dye penetration into membrane-compromised cells.

• Photoactivation: Expose samples to high-intensity light source (e.g., PMA-Lite LED device) for 15-20 minutes to activate PMA and crosslink DNA in dead cells.

• DNA Extraction: Extract DNA using standardized kits (e.g., Mo Bio PowerBiofilm DNA Isolation Kit) with mechanical lysis to ensure complete DNA release from all bacterial species.

• Quantitative PCR: Perform species-specific TaqMan qPCR assays targeting single-copy genes (rgg for S. oralis, rpoB for V. dispar) or variable regions in multiple 16S rDNA copies. Use the following cycling parameters: 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute.

This protocol demonstrated a 1 to 1.6 log~10~ reduction in PCR counts after PMA treatment in chlorhexidine-treated biofilms, closely matching CFU counts for total bacteria and most single species [65].

Advanced Protocol: Minimizing False-Negative Results in vPCR

Recent optimization studies with Salmonella Enteritidis have identified critical improvements to reduce false-negative results, which occur when viability dye binds to live cell DNA [66]:

• PMAxx Concentration Optimization: Determine optimal dye concentration through titration. For Salmonella, 100 μM PMAxx completely removed DNA from 10^8 CFU/mL heat-killed cells without sequential treatment [66].

• Tube Change Procedure: After PMAxx treatment and photoactivation, transfer cells to a new polypropylene tube before lysis. This prevents dye adsorbed to tube walls from binding to DNA released from live cells during lysis [66].

• Inclusion of DMSO: Add 20% DMSO to PMAxx treatments to improve dye permeability in dead cells without affecting live cells [66].

This optimized protocol eliminated false positives from high concentrations of dead cells (10^8 CFU/mL) while minimizing false negatives, reducing the limit of detection by only 1 log (from 10^3 CFU/mL to 10^4 CFU/mL) for live cells [66].

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Viability PCR

Reagent/Equipment	Function	Application Notes	References
PMA (Propidium Monoazide)	DNA intercalating dye for membrane-compromised cells	Penetrates dead cells; 50-100 μM concentration; requires dark incubation	[65]
PMAxx	Enhanced viability dye	Improved membrane selectivity; reduced live cell penetration	[66]
DMSO (Dimethyl Sulfoxide)	Solvent for viability dyes	Use at 20% to improve dye permeability in dead cells	[66]
PMA-Lite LED Device	Photoactivation light source	Provides intense visible light for dye activation (15-20 min)	[65]
Species-Specific TaqMan Assays	Targeted DNA quantification	High specificity; targets single-copy genes for better quantification	[65]
Universal dnaK Primers	Broad-range bacterial detection	SYBR Green format; degenerative primers for conserved gene	[65]

Technical Considerations and Methodological Refinements

Critical Factors Influencing vPCR Performance

The accuracy of vPCR assays depends on several technical parameters that require optimization for specific applications:

• Dye Selection and Concentration: PMA demonstrates better selectivity for dead cells than ethidium monoazide (EMA), which may penetrate intact membranes [65]. Optimal concentration must be determined empirically; insufficient dye fails to suppress dead cell signals, while excess dye may inhibit live cell detection [66].

• Amplicon Characteristics: Targeting longer amplicons (500-600 bp) from single-copy genes increases the likelihood that viability dyes will effectively inhibit amplification from dead cells [15] [66]. Multiple-copy targets (e.g., 16S rDNA) may require higher dye concentrations for complete suppression.

• Sample Matrix Effects: Complex samples like biofilms may require additional optimization due to extracellular DNA, debris, and varying antimicrobial susceptibility across species [65].

Addressing the VBNC Challenge in Diagnostic Applications

The detection of VBNC cells represents both a challenge and opportunity for vPCR technologies. While conventional culture methods cannot recover these dormant cells, vPCR can potentially detect them based on their membrane integrity [5]. Recent research has confirmed VBNC state induction in oral pathogens including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Enterococcus faecalis, and transient Helicobacter pylori, with significant implications for chronic systemic infections [5]. The ability of vPCR to detect these clinically relevant but non-culturable populations represents a significant advantage over both culture and conventional PCR methods.

The intact membrane dilemma presents both analytical challenges and opportunities for innovation in microbial viability assessment. Viability PCR technologies, particularly those utilizing optimized PMA and PMAxx protocols, offer a promising approach to distinguish between live and dead cells while addressing the critical problem of overestimation from dead cell DNA. The continuing refinement of vPCR methodologies—including dye formulations, sample processing techniques, and detection protocols—enhances their reliability for applications ranging from antimicrobial efficacy testing to food safety monitoring and clinical diagnostics.

Future directions in this field should focus on standardized protocols that minimize both false-positive and false-negative results, particularly for complex sample matrices like multispecies biofilms. Additionally, the integration of vPCR with other advanced techniques may provide comprehensive solutions for detecting the full spectrum of bacterial viability states, including VBNC populations that play significant roles in persistent infections. As these methodologies mature, they will increasingly enable researchers and drug development professionals to accurately assess microbial viability, ultimately supporting the development of more effective therapeutic strategies against resilient bacterial populations.

The detection and study of the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state in bacteria represent a significant challenge in microbiology and public health. Pathogenic bacteria in the VBNC state evade conventional culture-based detection methods, posing a hidden threat in food safety, clinical diagnostics, and environmental monitoring [23]. Molecular detection methods, particularly those utilizing viability dyes, have emerged as powerful tools for differentiating between viable and dead cells by leveraging cell membrane integrity as a key indicator of viability [8].

The efficacy of these dye-based methods hinges on the precise optimization of three critical parameters: dye concentration, incubation time, and photoactivation conditions. These factors collectively determine the success of dyes in selectively penetrating cells with compromised membranes and inhibiting DNA amplification from non-viable sources [67]. Without systematic optimization, researchers risk both false-negative results from incomplete suppression of dead cell signals and false-positive results from dye-induced toxicity to viable cells [41]. This technical guide provides a comprehensive framework for optimizing these parameters across diverse experimental conditions, with particular emphasis on applications within VBNC state detection research.

Fundamental Principles of Viability Dyes

Viability dyes such as propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium monoazide (EMA) function as DNA intercalating agents that selectively enter cells with compromised membranes, a characteristic feature of dead cells. Following photoactivation, these dyes form stable covalent bonds with DNA, effectively suppressing its amplification in subsequent PCR reactions [8] [67]. This selective inhibition allows researchers to distinguish between viable cells with intact membranes and non-viable cells with compromised membranes, making these dyes particularly valuable for detecting VBNC cells which maintain membrane integrity despite their non-culturable status [23].

The fundamental mechanism involves a three-step process: First, the dye enters membrane-compromised cells while being excluded from viable cells. Second, photoactivation with bright light creates reactive nitrene intermediates that covalently cross-link the dye to DNA. Third, the cross-linked DNA is unable to undergo amplification, thus providing selective quantification of viable cells [41] [67]. The effectiveness of this process depends critically on the balance between complete suppression of dead cell signals and the avoidance of cytotoxicity to viable cells, a balance that must be empirically determined for each experimental system.

Optimization Parameters: Quantitative Analysis

Key Factors and Their Interactions

Research demonstrates that optimal dye conditions vary significantly depending on the sample matrix, target microorganism, and specific dye employed. The following table synthesizes optimal parameters from recent studies for different bacterial species and sample types:

Table 1: Optimal dye treatment conditions for different bacterial species and sample types

Bacterial Species	Sample Matrix	Optimal Dye Concentration	Optimal Incubation Time (min)	Optimal Photoactivation Time (min)	Reference
Listeria monocytogenes	Raw Manure (20 g·kg⁻¹ TSS)	55 μM PMA	5	56	[67]
Listeria monocytogenes	Lagoon Effluent (0.4 g·kg⁻¹ TSS)	20 μM PMA	20	30	[67]
High-alcohol-producing K. pneumoniae	Laboratory Buffer	20-100 μM PMA	10-20	15 (with halogen light)	[41]

The differential optimization requirements for manure versus lagoon effluent highlight a crucial principle: matrices with higher total suspended solids (TSS) require significantly higher PMA concentrations and extended photoactivation times. This is attributed to the interference caused by organic matter, which can retain dyes and reduce light penetration during photoactivation [67].

Matrix Effects and Experimental Design

Sample composition profoundly affects dye performance. Complex matrices with high organic content or turbidity necessitate customized optimization protocols. A study on piggery effluents employed a Doehlert experimental design to simultaneously evaluate the effects of PMA concentration, incubation time, and photoactivation time, revealing that PMA concentration was the most significant factor for manure, while photoactivation time was most critical for lagoon effluent [67].

This matrix-dependent variability underscores the importance of preliminary optimization studies rather than relying on standardized protocols. The use of response surface methodology and desirability functions represents a sophisticated approach to identifying optimal conditions that balance multiple response variables, particularly the simultaneous minimization of signals from viable cells (Δviable) and maximization of signals from dead cells (Δdead) [67].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol for Optimizing PMA Treatment in Complex Matrices

Reagents and Equipment:

• PMA or EMA dye (commercially available from biotech suppliers)
• Halogen light source (500-650 W) or dedicated PMA-Lite device
• Real-time PCR instrument and reagents
• Microcentrifuge tubes with transparent lids
• Sample material (bacterial culture in the matrix of interest)

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Prepare samples containing known ratios of viable and heat-killed cells of the target bacterium in the matrix of interest. The use of defined ratios enables quantitative assessment of optimization efficacy [67].
• Dye Addition: Add PMA to samples across a concentration gradient (e.g., 5-200 μM). Include controls without dye for both viable and dead cells [41].
• Incubation: Incubate samples in the dark at room temperature for varying durations (5-30 minutes) to allow dye penetration into membrane-compromised cells [41] [67].
• Photoactivation: Place samples on ice or a cooling block at a defined distance (typically 20 cm) from a halogen light source. Expose for varying durations (1-60 minutes) to activate the dye [67].
• DNA Extraction and qPCR: Extract DNA following standard protocols and perform qPCR targeting a species-specific gene. Calculate the log reduction in dead cell signals (Δdead) and the minimal impact on viable cell signals (Δviable) [67].

Validation: The optimized protocol should maximize Δdead (indicating effective suppression of dead cell signals) while minimizing Δviable (indicating minimal effect on viable cells). Successful optimization typically achieves Δdead values approaching the theoretical maximum (3-4 log10 reduction) with Δviable values below 0.5 log10 [67].

Workflow for VBNC Cell Detection Using Optimized Dye Protocols

The following diagram illustrates the integrated workflow for detecting VBNC cells using optimized dye treatment protocols:

Protocol for VBNC State Induction and Validation

VBNC Induction:

• Culture Preparation: Grow the target bacterial strain to mid-log phase in appropriate medium [41].
• Stress Application: Transfer cells to a stress-inducing environment such as:
  • Artificial seawater at 4°C for nutrient starvation [41]
  • Sub-lethal concentrations of disinfectants (e.g., 0.01% hydrogen peroxide) [28]
  • Other stressors relevant to the research context (low temperature, high salinity) [23]
• Monitoring: Regularly monitor culturability by plating on non-selective media. The VBNC state is confirmed when no colonies form after extended incubation but viability is maintained as confirmed by molecular methods [41].

Validation Techniques:

• Live/Dead Staining: Use fluorescent stains (e.g., SYTO 9 and PI) to confirm membrane integrity [8] [28].
• Molecular Methods: Apply optimized PMA-qPCR or PMA-ddPCR to quantify viable cells [41].
• Resuscitation Experiments: Attempt to reverse the VBNC state by removing stressors to confirm reversibility [23].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential reagents and materials for viability dye assays

Reagent/Material	Function/Principle	Application Notes	References
PMA (Propidium Monoazide)	Membrane-impermeant DNA intercalating dye; selectively enters dead cells with compromised membranes	Preferred over EMA for lower cytotoxicity to viable cells; requires concentration optimization (typically 20-100 μM)	[8] [41] [67]
EMA (Ethidium Monoazide)	Membrane-impermeant DNA intercalating dye; alternative to PMA	Can penetrate viable cells via efflux pumps, potentially causing false positives; use with caution	[8]
Halogen Light Source	Photoactivation of intercalated dyes to create covalent DNA cross-links	Typical specifications: 500-650W, 20cm distance, 15-60min exposure; critical parameter for optimization	[41] [67]
PMAxx	Improved version of PMA with enhanced performance	potentially offering better suppression of dead cell signals	[8]
Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)	Absolute quantification of DNA targets without standard curves	Enables precise quantification of viable cells when combined with PMA; superior for complex matrices	[41]
Live/Dead BacLight Kit	Fluorescent viability staining using SYTO9 and PI	Validation tool for membrane integrity assessment; used in conjunction with flow cytometry or microscopy	[8]

Advanced Applications in VBNC Research

Integration with Novel Detection Platforms

Emerging technologies are enhancing the application of optimized dye protocols in VBNC research. Hyperspectral microscopy combined with artificial intelligence has demonstrated 97.1% accuracy in classifying VBNC E. coli cells based on their spectral profiles, providing a rapid, culture-free detection method that complements molecular approaches [28]. Similarly, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) enables absolute quantification of VBNC cells without external standard curves, particularly valuable for complex samples like fecal matter where precise quantification is challenging [41].

The integration of optimized dye treatments with these advanced detection platforms creates powerful workflows for VBNC research. For instance, PMA-ddPCR using multiple single-copy genes (KP, rpoB, and adhE for K. pneumoniae) provides robust, reproducible quantification of VBNC cells while minimizing false negatives [41].

Interplay Between VBNC Induction and Detection

Understanding the conditions that induce the VBNC state is essential for developing effective detection strategies. Recent research has identified multiple stressors that can trigger VBNC state formation in foodborne pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes, including disinfectants, essential oils, desiccation, low temperatures, nutrient limitation, high NaCl concentrations, and low pH adjusted with acetic acid [23]. This knowledge informs both the development of realistic experimental models and the optimization of detection methods for specific application contexts.

The relationship between VBNC induction methods and dye optimization parameters follows a logical structure that can be visualized as follows:

The optimization of dye concentration, incubation time, and photoactivation conditions represents a critical methodological foundation for reliable VBNC state detection. As demonstrated across multiple studies, there are no universal optimal values for these parameters; instead, they must be empirically determined for specific sample matrices and target microorganisms [67] [41]. The systematic optimization approach outlined in this guide provides a framework for developing robust, reproducible methods that effectively suppress false positive signals from dead cells while preserving accurate detection of viable cells.

Future developments in VBNC research will likely focus on standardizing detection methods across laboratories, particularly for regulatory applications in food safety [23]. Additionally, the integration of optimized dye protocols with emerging technologies like hyperspectral imaging and AI-assisted analysis [28] promises to further enhance the speed and accuracy of VBNC detection. As our understanding of the VBNC state deepens, the continued refinement of these fundamental methodological approaches will remain essential for addressing the public health challenges posed by these elusive bacterial populations.

Within the study of bacterial pathogenesis and food safety, the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state represents a significant challenge. This dormant state, induced by environmental stressors, allows bacteria to survive conditions that would normally kill them while becoming undetectable by conventional culture-based methods [14] [8]. The establishment of robust, well-characterized control populations—specifically heat-killed and VBNC-induced cells—is therefore a critical foundation for any research aimed at developing detection methods that can overcome this limitation. This technical guide provides detailed methodologies and frameworks for creating and validating these essential control populations within the broader context of VBNC research.

The Critical Role of Control Populations in VBNC Research

Scientific Rationale for Control Groups

The accurate detection and quantification of VBNC cells hinges on the researcher's ability to distinguish between three distinct physiological states: culturable (viable), non-culturable but metabolically active (VBNC), and dead (non-viable). Each control population serves a unique purpose in assay validation. Heat-killed controls provide a baseline for non-viable cells, typically characterized by compromised cell membranes. VBNC-induced controls represent the target population of interest—cells with intact membranes and low metabolic activity that resist cultivation on standard media. Culturable controls serve as a reference for normally growing cells. Without these properly established controls, validation of any VBNC detection assay lacks scientific rigor, potentially leading to false positives or negatives in viability assessment.

Implications for Food Safety and Clinical Diagnostics

The significance of proper control establishment extends beyond basic research. In food safety, pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio cholerae in the VBNC state evade standard culture-based detection mandated by regulations such as ISO 21872-1:2023-06, creating undetected public health risks [14] [8]. Similarly, in clinical diagnostics, pathogens like Klebsiella pneumoniae can enter the VBNC state in response to antibiotic treatment, leading to persistent, undetectable infections that may resuscitate after treatment cessation [46] [41]. Robust controls enable the development of detection methods that can identify these hidden threats.

Establishing VBNC-Induced Control Populations

Chemical Induction Methods

Chemical induction provides a rapid, reproducible method for generating VBNC controls. The key advantage of this approach is the speed with which researchers can generate sufficient VBNC cells for assay validation, typically within hours rather than days or weeks required for some environmental induction methods.

Table 1: Chemical Induction Protocols for VBNC Control Generation

Bacterial Species	Induction Solution	Treatment Duration	Initial Cell Density	Efficiency	Citation
Vibrio parahaemolyticus	0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 + 0.2 M ammonium carbonate	1 hour	7.3 Log₁₀ cells/mL	≈6.5 Log₁₀ cells/mL induced	[14]
V. cholerae	0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 + 0.2 M ammonium carbonate	1 hour	7.3 Log₁₀ cells/mL	≈6.5 Log₁₀ cells/mL induced	[14]
Listeria monocytogenes	1% Lutensol XP30 + 1 M MgCl₂	1 hour at room temperature	Early log phase (OD₆₀₀: 0.6)	Complete induction	[68]
Escherichia coli	1% Lutensol XP30 + 1 M K₂CO₃	1 hour at room temperature	Early log phase (OD₆₀₀: 0.6)	Complete induction	[68]
Bacillus cereus	1% Lutensol XP30 + 2 M MgCl₂	1 hour at room temperature	Early log phase (OD₆₀₀: 0.6)	Complete induction	[68]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa	1% Lutensol XP30 + 2 M MgCl₂	1 hour at room temperature	Early log phase (OD₆₀₀: 0.6)	Complete induction	[68]

The general protocol for chemical induction involves harvesting early log-phase cells (OD₆₀₀ ≈ 0.6) by centrifugation at 8,000 ×g for 5 minutes, resuspending the pellet in the appropriate induction solution, incubating at room temperature for 1 hour, then washing with phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) to remove induction chemicals before resuspending in appropriate medium [68]. The efficiency of induction should be confirmed by plate counting, with successful induction defined as a reduction in culturable cells to below 1 CFU/mL [69].

Environmental Stress Induction Methods

Environmental induction methods mimic the natural stresses that trigger the VBNC state in real-world settings, including food processing environments, clinical contexts, and natural habitats. While slower than chemical methods, they may produce VBNC cells with characteristics more relevant to specific application scenarios.

For Pediococcus acidilactici, incubation at -20°C effectively induces the VBNC state, with daily monitoring of culturable counts until they fall below 1 cell/mL [69]. For E. coli K-12, exposure to low concentrations of oxidative (0.01% hydrogen peroxide) or acidic (0.001% peracetic acid) stressors for 3 days successfully induces the VBNC state [28]. For Klebsiella pneumoniae, storage in artificial seawater at 4°C induces the VBNC state within approximately 50 days, with confirmation by lack of colony formation on LB agar plates after 48 hours of incubation at 37°C [41].

Establishing Heat-Killed Control Populations

Thermal Inactivation Protocols

Heat killing provides a straightforward method for generating non-viable control cells. The standardized protocol involves exposing bacterial suspensions to 85°C for 20 minutes using a laboratory standard heat block [8]. Alternative approaches include water bath treatments, though dry-heat blocks provide more consistent temperature transfer. For Listeria monocytogenes cocktails, this method achieves complete inactivation as confirmed by absence of growth on Oxford agar after incubation at 37°C for 24 hours [8].

Chemical Inactivation Methods

Chemical inactivation using sanitizers provides an alternative to thermal killing that may better mimic certain real-world scenarios. For Listeria monocytogenes, adding sodium hypochlorite to achieve a residual concentration of 10 mg/L free chlorine with a 1-minute exposure time effectively inactivates cells [8]. The reaction is then quenched with 0.3 M sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate. Free chlorine concentration should be verified using a digital chlorine colorimeter kit employing the DPD method [8].

Validation of Control Populations

Culture-Based Confirmation

The fundamental validation step for both VBNC-induced and heat-killed controls is demonstrating the absence of growth on standard culture media. For VBNC-induced cells, this confirms the non-culturable state; for heat-killed cells, it confirms non-viability. The protocol involves plating serial dilutions of treated cell suspensions onto appropriate agar plates (e.g., LB agar for K. pneumoniae, Oxford agar for L. monocytogenes, ALOA/OCLA agar for confirmatory plating of Listeria inocula) followed by incubation at optimal growth temperatures for 24-48 hours [8] [41]. Successful induction or killing is confirmed when culturable counts fall below the detection limit of 1 CFU/mL.

Viability Staining and Microscopy

Viability staining using fluorescent dyes distinguishes intact vs. compromised cell membranes, a key characteristic differentiating VBNC cells (intact membranes) from dead cells (compromised membranes). The Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability kit, containing SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (PI), is widely employed [8] [69]. SYTO 9 penetrates all cells, while PI only penetrates cells with damaged membranes. When both dyes are present, PI reduces SYTO 9 fluorescence, resulting in dead cells fluorescing red and viable cells (including VBNC) fluorescing green. The staining protocol involves adding dye mixture to bacterial suspensions, incubating in darkness for 15-30 minutes, then examining by fluorescence microscopy. VBNC populations should show predominantly green fluorescence, while heat-killed populations show predominantly red fluorescence.

Molecular Validation with Viability Dyes

Viability quantitative PCR (v-qPCR) using DNA intercalating dyes provides molecular validation of control populations. Propidium monoazide (PMA) or its improved version PMAxx selectively penetrates cells with compromised membranes, binding covalently to DNA upon photoactivation and preventing PCR amplification [14] [8] [41]. Ethidium monoazide (EMA) shows similar properties but with higher cytotoxicity toward viable cells [8]. The optimized protocol for complex matrices like process wash water uses 10 μM EMA and 75 μM PMAxx incubated at 40°C for 40 minutes followed by a 15-minute light exposure [8]. For K. pneumoniae, optimal PMA concentration ranges from 5-200 μM with incubation times of 5-30 minutes in darkness before photoactivation [41]. Successful validation shows strong PCR inhibition in heat-killed controls but not in VBNC-induced controls.

Table 2: Viability PCR Validation Methods for Control Populations

Method	Key Reagents	Optimal Conditions	Target Bacteria	Advantages	Limitations
v-qPCR with PMA	PMA, species-specific primers	5-200 μM PMA, 5-30 min dark incubation, 15 min light activation	K. pneumoniae, Vibrio spp.	High specificity, quantitative	Requires optimization for each species/matrix
v-qPCR with PMAxx/EMA	PMAxx, EMA	10 μM EMA + 75 μM PMAxx, 40°C for 40 min, 15 min light	L. monocytogenes	Effective in complex matrices	Potential overestimation of VBNC cells
vqPCR with Reagent D	Proprietary dye (Reagent D)	Species-specific protocols	V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae	Detects as low as 3.5 cells	Proprietary dye requirement
Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)	PMA, droplet generator	Optimized PMA concentration, microdroplet partitioning	K. pneumoniae	Absolute quantification without standard curves	Specialized equipment needed

Metabolic Activity Assessment

Assessment of metabolic activity provides additional validation of the VBNC state, particularly through measurement of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. The BacTiter-Glo Microbial Cell Viability Assay measures de novo ATP generation as an indicator of cell vitality [68]. This approach is particularly valuable for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobials against VBNC cells, revealing their enhanced tolerance compared to culturable cells [68]. VBNC controls should show reduced but detectable ATP levels, while heat-killed controls show minimal ATP signal.

Advanced Detection and Validation Technologies

AI-Enabled Hyperspectral Microscopy

Emerging technologies offer powerful new approaches for validating control populations. AI-enabled hyperspectral microscope imaging (HMI) captures both spatial and spectral data from bacterial cells, revealing subtle physiological changes associated with the VBNC state [28]. The methodology involves obtaining HMI data, extracting pseudo-RGB images using three characteristic spectral wavelengths, then training deep learning models (e.g., EfficientNetV2-based convolutional neural networks) to classify normal and VBNC cells. This approach has demonstrated 97.1% accuracy in classifying VBNC E. coli, significantly outperforming models trained on standard RGB images (83.3% accuracy) [28].

Digital PCR for Absolute Quantification

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) provides absolute quantification of VBNC cells without requiring standard curves [46] [41]. This microfluidic-based method partitions samples into thousands of nanoliter droplets, with PCR amplification occurring in each droplet independently. By counting positive and negative droplets, absolute quantification of target genes is achieved through Poisson statistics. When combined with PMA treatment (PMA-ddPCR), this method enables direct quantification of viable cells, even in complex samples like fecal matter [41]. For K. pneumoniae, targeting single-copy genes (KP, rpoB, and adhE) provides robust quantification of VBNC cells [41].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VBNC Control Preparation and Validation

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Application	Key Considerations
Viability Dyes	Live/Dead BacLight kit, SYTO 9, Propidium Iodide	Membrane integrity assessment	Standard for fluorescence microscopy
DNA Intercalating Dyes	PMA, PMAxx, EMA	Viability PCR	PMAxx shows improved performance over PMA
Induction Chemicals	Lutensol A03/XP30, Ammonium carbonate, MgCl₂, K₂CO₃	VBNC control generation	Concentration and combination are species-specific
Culture Media	LB agar, Oxford agar, ALOA/OCLA agar	Culturability confirmation	Selective vs. non-selective media impacts recovery
PCR Reagents	Bst DNA polymerase, primers for groEL, ompW, rpoB	Molecular detection	Target conserved, single-copy genes
ATP Assay Kits	BacTiter-Glo Microbial Cell Viability Assay	Metabolic activity measurement	Correlates with viable cell number
Sanitizers/Inactivators	Sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid	Heat-killed control preparation/induction	Concentration and exposure time critical

Experimental Workflow for Control Establishment

The following diagram illustrates the complete workflow for establishing and validating robust control populations for VBNC research:

The establishment of properly validated heat-killed and VBNC-induced control populations represents a fundamental requirement for rigorous VBNC research. The methodologies outlined in this guide—from chemical and environmental induction protocols to multi-modal validation approaches—provide researchers with the technical foundation needed to develop reliable detection assays. As the field advances, emerging technologies like AI-enabled microscopy and digital PCR will further enhance our ability to characterize and quantify these elusive bacterial populations, ultimately strengthening food safety systems, clinical diagnostics, and public health protection against hidden microbial threats.

The accurate detection and identification of bacterial pathogens is a cornerstone of effective clinical and research microbiology. The fundamental division between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, based on structural differences in their cell envelopes, presents a significant challenge for diagnostic protocols, especially within the context of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state research. The VBNC state is a dormant survival strategy adopted by many bacteria under stress, characterized by low metabolic activity and a resistance to standard culture-based detection, despite the cells retaining viability and pathogenicity [70]. This state is particularly problematic as VBNC cells can evade routine clinical diagnostics, leading to false negatives and subsequent public health risks [14]. The detection of VBNC cells is therefore a critical frontier in microbiology, demanding methods that are not only highly sensitive but also specifically adapted to overcome the distinct cellular barriers of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. This guide details the rationale and methodologies for adapting detection protocols, including advanced molecular and flow cytometric techniques, to effectively address these challenges.

Structural and Physiological Divergences Influencing Protocol Design

The efficacy of any detection or laboratory protocol is fundamentally constrained by the profound structural differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. These differences dictate how reagents access the cell interior and must be the primary consideration in protocol adaptation.

The Gram-positive cell envelope is characterized by a thick, multi-layered peptidoglycan wall that provides mechanical strength but is also porous. Externally, it features teichoic and lipoteichoic acids which contribute to the overall negative charge of the cell surface [71]. In contrast, the Gram-negative envelope is a more complex, multi-membrane structure. It possesses a thin peptidoglycan layer sandwiched between an inner cytoplasmic membrane and a unique outer membrane. This outer membrane is composed of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and acts as a formidable permeability barrier [71]. The presence of LPS, stabilized by divalent cations like Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺, is a key factor in the innate resistance of Gram-negative bacteria to many hydrophobic compounds and dyes [71].

These structural variances are directly responsible for the differential susceptibility of bacteria to chemical and physical stresses. Protocols designed for Gram-negative bacteria often require agents that can disrupt the robust, hydrophobic outer membrane, whereas those for Gram-positive bacteria must contend with degrading a thick, cross-linked peptidoglycan shell. This is exemplified in the differential lysis by an NaOH-Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) solution, where Gram-negative bacteria like Escherichia coli are easily lysed, while Gram-positive bacteria like Enterococcus faecalis demonstrate significant resistance [72]. Furthermore, these structural properties are major determinants of a bacterium's entry into the VBNC state and its subsequent detection, as methods must be capable of penetrating these barriers to identify signs of viable but dormant life [70].

Table 1: Core Structural Differences Dictating Protocol Adaptation

Feature	Gram-Positive Bacteria	Gram-Negative Bacteria	Impact on Protocol Design
Peptidoglycan Layer	Thick, multi-layered	Thin, single-layered	Gram-positives require more aggressive enzymatic or chemical disruption.
Outer Membrane	Absent	Present (LPS-containing)	Gram-negatives require membrane-disrupting agents (e.g., EDTA, chelators).
Permeability	Generally more porous	Highly selective barrier	Dyes and reagents penetrate Gram-positives more readily.
VBNC Induction	Stress-induced dormancy	Stress-induced dormancy	Universal trigger, but entry/exit mechanisms may differ.
VBNC Detection Challenge	Penetrating peptidoglycan to prove viability	Disrupting outer membrane to prove viability	Lysis and staining protocols must be tailored to the envelope type.

Adapted Experimental Protocols for Pathogen Differentiation and VBNC Detection

Rapid Gram-Type Discrimination via Alkaline Lysis and Flow Cytometry

A rapid, culture-independent method for discriminating Gram-types in liquid samples (e.g., urine) leverages the differential tolerance of cell walls to an NaOH-SDS solution, quantified by flow cytometry [72].

Detailed Protocol:

• Sample Preparation: Standardize the bacterial sample (e.g., urine, liquid culture) to a concentration within the detection range of the flow cytometer (e.g., 10⁴ to 10⁸ cells/mL).
• Lysis Reagent: Prepare a fresh NaOH-SDS solution (e.g., 0.2N NaOH, 1% SDS). The alkaline pH and ionic detergent work synergistically to disrupt membrane integrity.
• Treatment: Mix equal volumes of the bacterial sample and the NaOH-SDS solution thoroughly.
• Incubation: Allow the reaction to proceed at room temperature for a standardized period of 5 minutes [72].
• Analysis: Immediately analyze the treated sample using a flow cytometer or an automated particle analyzer (e.g., Sysmex UF-1000i). The instrument counts the remaining intact particles.
• Interpretation: A significant reduction (>90%) in bacterial count post-treatment indicates complete lysis, characteristic of Gram-negative bacteria. A persistent, high bacterial count indicates resistance to lysis, characteristic of Gram-positive bacteria [72].

Detection of VBNC Cells via Viable Quantitative PCR (vqPCR)

Conventional culture methods cannot detect VBNC cells, leading to false negatives. vqPCR combines a viability dye with PCR to selectively amplify DNA only from cells with intact membranes.

Detailed Protocol:

• Sample Processing: Concentrate bacteria from the sample (e.g., food, water, clinical specimen) via centrifugation or filtration.
• Viability Staining: Resuspend the pellet in a solution containing a proprietary DNA intercalating dye (e.g., Reagent D [14] or propidium monoazide). This dye penetrates cells with compromised membranes and covalently bonds to their DNA upon light exposure, inhibiting its amplification.
• Photoactivation: Expose the sample to bright light to cross-link the dye in dead cells.
• DNA Extraction: Lyse all cells (including VBNC) to release DNA. The DNA from dead cells is pre-blocked, while DNA from viable/VBNC cells is available for amplification.
• PCR Amplification: Perform qPCR targeting long, species-specific gene fragments (e.g., groEL [510 bp] for V. parahaemolyticus, ompW [588 bp] for V. cholerae) [14]. The use of long fragments increases confidence that the signal originates from intact, viable cells rather than residual environmental DNA.
• Interpretation: A positive qPCR signal confirms the presence of viable (including VBNC) cells of the target pathogen. This method has been shown to detect VBNC cells in >50% of samples that were culture-negative [14].

Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Bacteremia

Machine learning (ML) models can leverage hematological parameters to provide an early prediction of Gram-negative bacteremia in emergency department settings.

Detailed Protocol:

• Data Collection: Collect routine hematological data from patients with suspected infection. Key parameters include:
  • Complete Blood Count (CBC): White blood cell count, platelet count, etc.
  • Differential Count (DC): Proportions of neutrophils, lymphocytes, etc.
  • Cell Population Data (CPD): Quantitative measures of leukocyte characteristics (e.g., volume, conductivity, scatter) from analyzers like the Beckman Coulter DxH 900, which reflect host immune responses to different bacterial types [73].
• Model Development: Train a gradient boosting model (e.g., CatBoost) using a large dataset of labeled cases (nonbacteremia, Gram-positive bacteremia, Gram-negative bacteremia).
• Prediction: The trained model analyzes new patient hematological data to classify the likelihood of Gram-negative bacteremia. These models have demonstrated high accuracy for Gram-negative bacteremia (AUROC 0.861-0.869) [73], potentially enabling faster, more targeted antibiotic therapy.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents for Adapted Protocols

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Differentiation and VBNC Detection

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Gram-Type Specificity / Consideration
NaOH-SDS Solution	Alkaline-ionic detergent lysis for Gram discrimination. Rapidly lyses Gram-negative but not Gram-positive cells [72].	Core reagent for the flow cytometry-based differentiation protocol.
Propidium Monoazide (PMA) / Reagent D	Viability dye for vqPCR; penetrates dead cells and binds DNA, preventing amplification [14].	Crucial for distinguishing viable/VBNC cells from free DNA/dead cells in molecular detection.
Gene-Specific Primers (e.g., groEL, ompW)	Targets for PCR amplification in vqPCR; long fragments ensure detection of intact cells [14].	Must be highly specific to the target pathogen (e.g., Vibrio species) to avoid false positives.
Lutensol A03 & Ammonium Carbonate	Chemical inducers for rapid VBNC state generation in control experiments [14].	Used to create standardized VBNC control cells for method validation in a laboratory setting.
Beckman Coulter DxH 900 Analyzer	Automated hematology analyzer providing Cell Population Data (CPD) [73].	Generates quantitative data on leukocyte morphology for ML models predicting bacteremia type.

Workflow and Pathway Visualizations

The following diagrams, generated using DOT language and compliant with the specified color palette and contrast rules, illustrate the core logical workflows described in this guide.

Diagram 1: Gram-Type Protocol Adaptation Logic.

Diagram 2: Rapid Gram Discrimination via Lysis & Flow Cytometry.

Diagram 3: VBNC State Detection via Viable qPCR (vqPCR).

The relentless challenges posed by antimicrobial resistance and the stealth of the VBNC state necessitate a move beyond one-size-fits-all diagnostic approaches. The strategic adaptation of protocols, grounded in a deep understanding of bacterial cell wall architecture, is paramount for advancing research and improving clinical outcomes. The methods detailed herein—from the simple yet powerful alkaline lysis for Gram-typing to the sophisticated vqPCR for VBNC detection and machine learning for early bacteremia prediction—provide a robust toolkit for scientists and clinicians. By systematically tailoring methodologies to the fundamental biological differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, the scientific community can enhance detection accuracy, deepen the understanding of bacterial pathogenesis and dormancy, and ultimately contribute to more effective therapeutic interventions and public health protection.

Benchmarking Performance: A Critical Comparison of VBNC Detection Platforms

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state represents a dormant condition in which bacteria remain metabolically active and retain pathogenicity but cannot form colonies on conventional growth media, rendering them undetectable by standard culture-based methods [14] [5]. This survival strategy, induced by environmental stresses such as nutrient starvation, extreme temperatures, and exposure to disinfectants or antibiotics, poses a significant challenge to public health, food safety, and clinical diagnostics [8] [27] [9]. VBNC cells maintain toxin production capabilities and can resuscitate under favorable conditions, leading to outbreaks and persistent infections that escape routine detection [14] [5]. Consequently, the development of sensitive, specific, and culture-independent detection platforms has become a critical research focus, driving the need for systematic comparisons of their analytical performance, particularly their limits of detection (LOD).

This technical guide provides an in-depth comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of major platforms employed in VBNC research, with a specific focus on their LODs. We present standardized experimental protocols, visualize core methodologies, and catalog essential research reagents to equip scientists with the practical tools necessary for advanced study in this evolving field.

Comparative Performance of VBNC Detection Platforms

The quantification of VBNC cells requires methodologies that differentiate them from both culturable and dead cells. The table below summarizes the key performance metrics of prominent detection platforms as reported in recent research.

Table 1: Comparison of Detection Platforms for VBNC Pathogens

Detection Platform	Target Organism	Limit of Detection (LOD)	Specificity Notes	Key Reagents
Viable qPCR (vqPCR)	Vibrio parahaemolyticus	3.5 cells (20 fg DNA) [14]	groEL gene (510 bp); high sensitivity in seafood samples	Proprietary dye "Reagent D" [14]
Viable qPCR (vqPCR)	Vibrio cholerae	6.9 cells (30 fg DNA) [14]	ompW gene (588 bp)	Proprietary dye "Reagent D" [14]
PMA-qPCR	Campylobacter jejuni	2.43 log CFU/mL (pure culture); 3.12 log CFU/g (chicken) [9]	rpoB gene (121 bp); highly specific to C. jejuni	Propidium Monoazide (PMA) [9]
PMA-ddPCR	Klebsiella pneumoniae (HiAlc)	Enabled detection of 0.64-1.13 log10 reduction in viable cells in mouse feces [27]	Targets single-copy genes (KP, rpoB, adhE); no standard curve needed	Propidium Monoazide (PMA) [27]
v-qPCR (EMA/PMAxx)	Listeria monocytogenes	Optimized for complex matrix (Process Wash Water) [8]	Effectively differentiates dead and VBNC cells in chlorinated water	EMA (10 μM) & PMAxx (75 μM) [8]

The data reveals that molecular methods, particularly viability PCR techniques, achieve remarkable sensitivity, detecting as few as 3.5 bacterial cells [14]. The transition from qPCR to ddPCR offers the advantage of absolute quantification without external standard curves, enhancing robustness for complex samples like fecal matter [27]. Furthermore, combining dyes like EMA and PMAxx improves the discrimination between dead and VBNC cells in challenging matrices such as food process wash water [8].

Experimental Protocols for Key VBNC Detection Methodologies

Protocol 1: VBNC Cell Induction via Chemical Stress

This protocol rapidly induces the VBNC state in Vibrio species, suitable for generating control cells for method validation [14].

• Culture Preparation: Grow the target Vibrio strain (e.g., V. parahaemolyticus or V. cholerae) to a high density (approximately 7.3 Log10 viable cells/mL).
• Stress Treatment: Pellet the cells and resuspend them in a solution containing 0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 and 0.2 M ammonium carbonate.
• Incubation: Incubate the cell suspension for one hour under standard conditions.
• Confirmation: Verify the induction of the VBNC state by plating on appropriate culture media. A successful induction (≈ 6.5 Log10 cells/mL) will show no colony formation, while viability stains confirm cell integrity.

Protocol 2: VBNC Cell Induction via Osmotic Stress forC. jejuni

This method induces the VBNC state in Campylobacter jejuni using osmotic pressure [9].

• Culture Preparation: Grow C. jejuni microaerobically in Mueller-Hinton broth to the exponential phase.
• Osmotic Stress: Add NaCl to the culture to a final concentration of 7%.
• Incubation: Incubate the culture under microaerobic conditions for less than 48 hours.
• Population Check: Monitor the population via plating. Induction is effective when >90% of the population enters the VBNC state.

Protocol 3: Viability PCR (vPCR) with PMA Treatment

This is a generalized protocol for detecting VBNC cells using PMA dye, adaptable for various bacterial species [8] [27] [9].

• Sample Preparation: Concentrate bacterial cells from the sample matrix (e.g., by centrifugation).
• PMA Treatment: a. Add PMA to the sample to a final optimized concentration (e.g., 20-50 μM) [27] [9]. b. Incubate in the dark for 10-30 minutes with gentle mixing. c. Photo-activate the dye by exposing the tube to a halogen light source (e.g., 500-650W) for 10-15 minutes on ice to crosslink PMA with DNA from dead cells.
• DNA Extraction: Pellet the cells, wash to remove residual PMA, and extract genomic DNA using a commercial kit.
• qPCR/ddPCR Amplification: a. qPCR: Perform amplification using species-specific primers (e.g., rpoB, groEL, ompW). Use a standard curve for absolute quantification [14] [9]. b. ddPCR: Partition the DNA sample into nanodroplets for PCR amplification. Quantify the target gene copy number directly using Poisson statistics, without a standard curve [27].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the core vPCR process.

VBNC Detection via Viability PCR

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Successful detection and quantification of VBNC state bacteria rely on a specific set of reagents. The table below details key solutions and their functions.

Table 2: Essential Reagents for VBNC State Research

Research Reagent	Function in VBNC Research	Application Notes
Propidium Monoazide (PMA)	DNA intercalating dye that penetrates only membrane-compromised (dead) cells. Upon photoactivation, it covalently binds DNA and inhibits its amplification in PCR.	Critical for differentiating viable (VBNC) from dead cells in vPCR. Less cytotoxic than EMA, reducing false positives [8] [9].
PMAxx	An improved version of PMA with enhanced efficacy in blocking DNA amplification from dead cells.	Often used in combination with EMA for complex sample matrices like process wash water to achieve optimal suppression [8].
Ethidium Monoazide (EMA)	A DNA intercalating dye similar to PMA, but can penetrate some viable cells via efflux pumps, potentially leading to false-negative results.	Used in specific combinations with PMAxx for challenging environments [8].
Lutensol A03 / Ammonium Carbonate	Chemical stress agents used to induce the VBNC state in laboratory cultures.	Enables rapid (e.g., within 1 hour) and controlled generation of VBNC cells for experimental studies [14].
Species-Specific Primers	Oligonucleotides designed to target unique, single-copy genes in the bacterial genome for PCR amplification.	Essential for specificity. Common targets include rpoB, groEL, ompW, and adhE [14] [27] [9].

The logical relationships between the VBNC state, detection reagents, and technologies are further summarized in the following diagram.

Logic of VBNC Detection Technologies

The showdown in sensitivity and specificity across detection platforms underscores a clear trend: while viability qPCR methods offer exceptional sensitivity for pure cultures and simple matrices, the complexity of real-world samples demands more sophisticated approaches. The integration of improved nucleic acid dyes like PMAxx and the adoption of absolute quantification technologies like ddPCR are pushing the boundaries of what is detectable. For researchers aiming to accurately monitor and risk-assess VBNC pathogens in clinical, food, or environmental settings, the choice of platform must be guided by the required LOD, the sample matrix, and the necessity for absolute versus relative quantification. The ongoing refinement of these protocols and reagents will continue to illuminate the hidden world of VBNC bacteria, ultimately strengthening our public health defenses.

The detection of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) bacteria represents a significant challenge in microbiology, with profound implications for food safety, clinical diagnostics, and public health. The VBNC state is a survival strategy wherein bacteria respond to adverse environmental conditions by entering a dormant state, maintaining metabolic activity while losing culturability on standard laboratory media [11]. This phenomenon leads to false-negative results in conventional culture-based methods, potentially allowing pathogenic bacteria to evade detection until conditions favor resuscitation [14]. The development of rapid, accurate detection methods that can differentiate VBNC cells from dead cells has therefore become a critical research focus, with technologies spanning from advanced microscopy to molecular amplification techniques.

This technical analysis examines the evolution of VBNC detection methodologies through the lens of throughput and operational speed. We provide a comprehensive comparison of established and emerging technologies, from lower-throughput microscopy techniques to advanced high-throughput qPCR systems, including detailed experimental protocols and performance metrics to guide researchers in selecting appropriate methods for their specific applications.

Methodological Landscape for VBNC Detection

Low-Throughput Microscopy Approaches

AI-Enabled Hyperspectral Microscopy represents a sophisticated imaging-based approach for VBNC detection. This method captures both spatial and spectral information from bacterial cells, enabling the identification of unique physiological signatures associated with the VBNC state [28].

• Experimental Protocol: The standard workflow involves several critical steps. First, the VBNC state is induced in bacterial cultures (e.g., Escherichia coli K-12) using low-level antimicrobial stressors such as 0.01% hydrogen peroxide or 0.001% peracetic acid for 3 days, with induction confirmed via live/dead staining and plate counting. Next, hyperspectral microscope imaging (HMI) collects spatial and spectral data, which is then extracted into pseudo-RGB images using three characteristic spectral wavelengths. Finally, a deep learning model (typically EfficientNetV2-based convolutional neural network) is trained on these images to automate classification of normal versus VBNC cells [28].

• Performance Metrics: This approach has demonstrated 97.1% classification accuracy for VBNC E. coli, significantly outperforming models trained on standard RGB images (83.3%). The method successfully identifies distinct spectral profiles specific to VBNC cells induced by antimicrobial stressors [28].

• Throughput Considerations: While powerful for morphological and physiological analysis, hyperspectral microscopy remains a lower-throughput technique due to the time required for image acquisition, processing, and computational analysis of individual cells or small populations.

Intermediate-Throughput Molecular Methods

Viability Quantitative PCR (v-qPCR) techniques have emerged as essential tools for VBNC detection, balancing reasonable throughput with excellent sensitivity. These methods incorporate sample pretreatment to differentiate DNA from viable and dead cells.

• PMA-qPCR Methodology: Propidium monoazide (PMA) selectively penetrates cells with compromised membranes (dead cells) and binds covalently to DNA upon photoactivation, preventing PCR amplification. This allows selective detection of viable cells (including VBNC) with intact membranes [74] [75].

• Experimental Protocol: The optimized PMA-qPCR protocol for E. coli involves treating samples with 50 μM PMA for 15 minutes under 650 W light intensity. After photoactivation, DNA extraction and qPCR targeting species-specific genes (e.g., rpoB or gyrA) are performed. For complex matrices like process wash water, a combination of 10 μM EMA and 75 μM PMAxx incubated at 40°C for 40 minutes followed by 15-minute light exposure provides optimal discrimination [74] [75].

• Performance Metrics: PMA-qPCR enables enumeration of VBNC E. coli in oyster samples with detection limits of 3-4 Log CFU/g in food matrices. The method significantly reduces amplification from dead cells while maintaining sensitivity for VBNC detection [74].

• Throughput Considerations: Standard qPCR platforms typically process 96-384 samples per run, with total processing times of 2-3 hours including sample preparation, making it suitable for intermediate-throughput applications.

Advanced High-Throughput Solutions

High-Throughput qPCR (HT-qPCR) systems represent the current pinnacle of throughput for molecular detection of VBNC pathogens, enabling large-scale screening applications.

• Methodology Overview: HT-qPCR adapts traditional qPCR chemistry to automated microfluidic platforms capable of processing hundreds to thousands of reactions simultaneously. Recent applications include detection of 22 waterborne pathogens (19 protozoa and 3 helminths) in a single assay [76].

• Performance Characteristics: Established HT-qPCR assays demonstrate a limit of detection of 5×10² copies/μL DNA, with excellent repeatability (coefficient of variation 1.0%-4.6%) and amplification efficiencies between 80% and 107% [76].

• Application to VBNC Detection: While specifically applied to waterborne pathogens, the HT-qPCR framework is directly adaptable to bacterial VBNC detection. When combined with viability dyes (PMA/EMA), it enables high-throughput screening for dormant pathogens in environmental and clinical samples [75] [76].

• Throughput Advantage: HT-qPCR dramatically increases testing capacity compared to conventional qPCR, with some systems capable of analyzing over 1,000 samples per day, making it ideal for large-scale surveillance and diagnostic applications [76].

Comparative Performance Analysis

Table 1: Throughput and Speed Comparison of VBNC Detection Methods

Method	Samples per Run	Time to Result	Limit of Detection	Key Advantages	Main Limitations
AI-Enabled Hyperspectral Microscopy	Individual cells or small populations	Hours to days (including processing)	Single-cell level	Distinct spectral profiles for VBNC cells; 97.1% classification accuracy	Low throughput; Complex instrumentation; Extensive algorithm training
v-qPCR (PMA/EMA)	96-384	2-3 hours	3.5-6.9 cells (V. parahaemolyticus/V. cholerae) [14]	Differentiation of viable/dead cells; Quantitative results; Moderate throughput	Matrix interference effects; Requires optimization for each sample type [74]
HT-qPCR	384+ (up to thousands)	3-4 hours	5×10² copies/μL [76]	Maximum throughput; Automated; Multiple targets simultaneously	Higher initial equipment cost; Complex data analysis

Table 2: VBNC Detection Efficacy Across Methods and Pathogens

Bacterial Species	Induction Method	Detection Technique	Detection Efficiency	Reference
Escherichia coli	Low-level oxidative/acidic stressors (0.01% H₂O₂, 0.001% PAA)	AI-enabled hyperspectral microscopy	97.1% accuracy	[28]
Vibrio parahaemolyticus	1% Lutensol A03 + 0.2M ammonium carbonate (1 hour)	vqPCR (groEL gene, 510 bp)	20 fg DNA (3.5 cells); 50% false-negative reduction in retail samples	[14]
Vibrio cholerae	0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 + 0.2M ammonium carbonate (1 hour)	vqPCR (ompW gene, 588 bp)	30 fg DNA (6.9 cells); 56% false-negative reduction in retail samples	[14]
Listeria monocytogenes	Chlorine treatment (10 mg/L)	v-qPCR (EMA/PMAxx)	Reliable detection in process wash water	[75]
Aliarcobacter faecis	Not specified	Species-specific qPCR (rpoB gene)	100 cells mL⁻¹ in agricultural water/dairy manure	[77]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for VBNC Detection

Reagent/Equipment	Function in VBNC Research	Application Examples	Technical Notes
PMA (Propidium Monoazide)	DNA intercalating dye that penetrates dead cells with compromised membranes	Selective detection of viable cells in v-qPCR; Concentration: 20-80 μM	Photoactivation required; Performance varies by bacterial species and matrix [74] [75]
PMAxx	Enhanced version of PMA with improved penetration and DNA binding	Combined with EMA for complex matrices (e.g., process wash water)	75 μM with 10 μM EMA at 40°C for 40 min optimal for Listeria in PWW [75]
EMA (Ethidium Monoazide)	Alternative viability dye; penetrates via efflux pumps	Used in combination with PMAxx for difficult samples	More prone to penetration into viable cells than PMA; use with caution [75]
Species-specific primers	Target conserved genes for precise identification	rpoB for A. faecis; gyrA for A. lanthieri; groEL for Vibrio spp.	Must be validated for specificity and amplification efficiency [77] [14]
Lutensol A03 with ammonium carbonate	Chemical inducer for rapid VBNC state induction	Generate VBNC controls for V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae within 1 hour	0.5-1.0% Lutensol A03 + 0.2M ammonium carbonate from 7.3 Log₁₀ cells/mL [14]
Hyperspectral imaging system	Captures spatial and spectral data for physiological profiling	Differentiation of VBNC E. coli via spectral signatures	Requires AI analysis for classification; generates pseudo-RGB images [28]

Technological Workflows and Method Selection

VBNC Detection Method Workflow Selection

The landscape of VBNC detection methodologies encompasses a diverse range of technologies, each with distinct advantages in throughput, speed, and application specificity. AI-enabled hyperspectral microscopy provides unparalleled single-cell analysis and classification accuracy but remains limited by lower throughput. Intermediate v-qPCR methods offer an optimal balance for many research settings, providing reliable quantification with reasonable throughput. For large-scale surveillance and diagnostic applications, HT-qPCR systems deliver the highest capacity with minimal turnaround times.

Method selection should be guided by specific research requirements, including sample volume, required sensitivity, available infrastructure, and analytical objectives. The integration of viability dyes with advanced amplification technologies continues to expand our capacity to detect and quantify these elusive bacterial populations, addressing critical challenges in food safety, clinical diagnostics, and public health protection. Future developments will likely focus on increasing automation, improving multiplexing capabilities, and reducing costs to make these advanced detection methods more accessible across diverse research and diagnostic settings.

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state is a dormant survival strategy employed by many bacterial pathogens, including Listeria monocytogenes, when subjected to environmental stress [78]. In this state, bacteria maintain metabolic activity and virulence potential but lose the ability to form visible colonies on standard culture media, leading to potential underestimation of pathogen levels and public health risks [79] [78]. Food processing environments, particularly wash water systems, present multiple stressors—such as disinfectants, nutrient limitation, and temperature fluctuations—that can induce the VBNC state in Listeria [80]. This poses a significant challenge for food safety monitoring programs that rely on culture-based methods, which may fail to detect these hidden hazards [79].

This case study evaluates the validation of EMA/PMAxx-quantitative PCR (qPCR) as a solution for detecting and quantifying viable Listeria in food processing wash water, addressing a critical gap in current food safety protocols. This approach aligns with the broader research imperative to develop detection methods that accurately reflect the true biological threats posed by VBNC pathogens throughout the One-Health continuum [78].

Technical Basis of EMA/PMAxx-qPCR

Fundamental Principles

EMA (ethidium monoazide) and its improved counterpart PMAxx are membrane-impermeant nucleic acid dyes that selectively penetrate cells with compromised membrane integrity—a key characteristic of dead bacteria [81] [82]. Upon exposure to bright light, these dyes form covalent cross-links with DNA, permanently modifying the DNA structure and subsequently inhibiting its amplification in PCR [81].

The critical distinction lies in the dye's selective action: it penetrates only membrane-compromised (dead) cells while being excluded from membrane-intact (viable) cells. This allows subsequent PCR amplification to target exclusively DNA from viable cells, providing a viability-based detection system [82]. PMAxx represents an enhanced version with higher molecular charge, improving its selectivity for dead cells and increasing the differential signal between live and dead populations [81].

Comparison with Conventional Detection Methods

Table 1: Comparison of Listeria Detection Methods in Wash Water

Method	Detection Principle	Time to Result	VBNC Detection	Key Limitations
Culture-Based (ISO standards)	Growth on selective media	4-5 days	No	Fails to detect VBNC cells; labor-intensive
Conventional qPCR	DNA amplification	24 hours	No (detects DNA from all cells)	Cannot distinguish viable and non-viable cells
EMA/PMAxx-qPCR	Viability dye + DNA amplification	24-30 hours	Yes	Requires optimization; may underestimate if membrane damage is incomplete

Traditional culture methods, while considered the gold standard for viable bacteria, cannot detect VBNC Listeria as these cells do not form colonies on routine plating media [79]. Standard qPCR methods detect target DNA regardless of cell viability, potentially leading to overestimation of infectious risk from non-viable pathogens or free DNA remnants [81] [83]. EMA/PMAxx-qPCR bridges this gap by providing the molecular specificity of PCR while incorporating a viability discrimination step [82].

Experimental Validation Framework

Sample Preparation and VBNC Induction

To simulate real-world conditions in food processing wash water, Listeria monocytogenes strains can be induced into the VBNC state using stressors relevant to processing environments:

• Nutrient limitation in minimal media or filtered wash water
• Sub-lethal disinfectant exposure (e.g., sodium hypochlorite at 200 mg/L) [84]
• Low temperature incubation (4°C) combined with high NaCl concentrations (up to 20%) [80]
• Combined stress factors reflecting actual processing conditions

VBNC induction is confirmed when plate counts drop to zero while viability stains (e.g., Live/Dead BacLight) continue to show metabolically active cells [79] [80].

PMAxx Treatment Protocol

The optimized PMAxx treatment protocol encompasses the following critical steps:

• Sample Preparation: Mix 1 mL of wash water sample with 10 μL of 1 mM PMAxx stock solution (final concentration: 50 μM) [81]
• Incubation: Incubate in the dark at 37°C for 15 minutes with occasional mixing to allow dye penetration into membrane-compromised cells [81] [82]
• Photoactivation: Expose samples to a PMA-Lite LED photoactivator or bright halogen light source for 15 minutes at room temperature to activate dye cross-linking [81]
• DNA Extraction: Proceed with standard DNA extraction protocols, such as the Virus DNA Extraction Kit II, following manufacturer instructions [81]

For complex matrices like wash water containing organic debris, concentration steps (e.g., centrifugation or filtration) may be necessary prior to PMAxx treatment to improve detection sensitivity.

qPCR Amplification and Detection

The qPCR component targets specific Listeria monocytogenes genes with validated primers and probes:

• Reaction Setup: 20 μL reaction volume containing 10 μL of PerfectStart R II Probe qPCR SuperMix, 0.5 μM of each primer and probe, and 5 μL of DNA template [81]
• Amplification Parameters:
  • Initial denaturation: 95°C for 10 minutes
  • 40 cycles of: 95°C for 15 seconds (denaturation), 60°C for 15 seconds (annealing), 72°C for 30 seconds (extension) [81]
• Detection Chemistry: TaqMan probe-based systems provide superior specificity compared to DNA-binding dyes [83]

Validation Parameters and Performance Metrics

Table 2: Key Performance Metrics for EMA/PMAxx-qPCR Validation

Validation Parameter	Target Performance	Assessment Method
Specificity	100% inclusivity for L. monocytogenes, 100% exclusivity for non-target species	Testing against 25 target and 37 non-target strains [82]
Linearity	R² ≥ 0.990 across detection range	Serial dilutions of viable cells from 10³ to 10⁸ CFU/mL [82]
Limit of Quantification (LOQ)	≤ 7.3 × 10³ CFU/mL	Lowest concentration with accuracy ±0.5 Log10 and precision <25% CV [82]
Accuracy/Trueness	Bias within ±0.5 Log10 units	Comparison with culture methods or theoretical values [82]
Precision	CV < 25% for replicate samples	Intra-assay and inter-assay variability assessment [83]
Ruggedness	Consistent performance across operators, instruments, days	Inter-laboratory validation studies [85]

Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for EMA/PMAxx-qPCR

Reagent/Material	Function	Specification Considerations
PMAxx Dye	Selective DNA modification in dead cells	1 mM stock solution in deionized water; light-sensitive storage [81]
Photoactivation Device	PMAxx activation	PMA-Lite LED system or equivalent halogen light source [81]
DNA Extraction Kit	Nucleic acid purification	Optimized for complex matrices; inhibitor removal capability [81]
qPCR Master Mix	DNA amplification	Probe-based chemistry; inhibitor-resistant formulations [83]
Species-Specific Primers/Probes	Target detection	Designed against conserved Listeria genes (e.g., hly, invA) [85] [78]
VBNC Induction Media	Stressor application	Low nutrition with high NaCl (up to 20%) at refrigeration temperatures [80]

Data Interpretation and Analytical Considerations

Quantification and Standardization

The quantification cycle (Cq) values obtained from qPCR must be converted to meaningful biological units (CFU/mL) through a standard curve generated from samples with known concentrations of viable Listeria [83]. This curve establishes the linear relationship between Cq values and bacterial counts, typically demonstrating a log-linear range of 10³ to 10⁸ CFU/mL with amplification efficiencies between 90-110% considered acceptable [83] [82].

Addressing Technical Challenges

Several technical challenges require consideration during method validation:

• Matrix Effects: Wash water composition varies significantly between processing facilities, potentially containing PCR inhibitors that affect amplification efficiency [85]. The inclusion of an internal amplification control is essential to identify inhibition issues [83].
• VBNC Resuscitation Potential: Even when accurately detected, the virulence potential of VBNC Listeria upon resuscitation remains a critical consideration for risk assessment [79] [78]. Studies indicate that VBNC Listeria may retain pathogenicity and can resuscitate under favorable conditions [79].
• Method Comparison: Validation should include parallel testing with both culture methods and viability staining to establish correlation and comparative sensitivity [79] [80].

The validation of EMA/PMAxx-qPCR for detecting Listeria in food processing wash water addresses a significant limitation in current food safety monitoring by enabling detection of VBNC cells that evade culture-based methods. This approach provides more accurate risk assessment and has the potential to enhance the sensitivity of environmental monitoring programs in food processing facilities.

Future developments in this field will likely focus on method automation for high-throughput testing [85], multiplexing capabilities for simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens, and integration with portable detection platforms for real-time monitoring. Additionally, further research is needed to establish the correlation between PMAxx-qPCR signals and infectious potential in complex food matrices, particularly for regulatory applications.

As the food industry continues to confront the challenges posed by VBNC pathogens, viability-based molecular detection methods like PMAxx-qPCR represent a critical advancement in our ability to accurately assess microbial risks and implement more effective control measures throughout the food production chain.

Campylobacter jejuni is a leading cause of foodborne bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide, with poultry products serving as a primary transmission vehicle [86] [9]. Conventional culture-based detection methods, while reliable for cultivable cells, face a significant limitation: they cannot detect bacteria that have entered the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state [14] [9]. When exposed to environmental stresses such as low temperature, osmotic shock, or aerobic conditions, C. jejuni can enter this dormant state, retaining metabolic activity and pathogenicity while losing the ability to grow on standard culture media [87] [9]. This VBNC state leads to a substantial underestimation of the true contamination level in food samples, posing a hidden threat to public health.

To address this critical detection gap, propidium monoazide combined with quantitative PCR (PMA-qPCR) has emerged as a powerful molecular tool. This method selectively quantifies viable cells (including those in the VBNC state) by inhibiting the amplification of DNA from dead cells with compromised membranes [88] [89]. This case study details the application of an optimized PMA-qPCR protocol for the accurate detection and quantification of viable C. jejuni on poultry products, providing a technical guide for researchers and food safety professionals.

Principles of VBNC State and PMA-qPCR

The VBNC State inCampylobacter jejuni

The VBNC state is a survival strategy adopted by many bacterial pathogens, including C. jejuni, in response to suboptimal environmental conditions. VBNC cells demonstrate a loss of culturability on standard laboratory media but maintain metabolic activity, membrane integrity, and pathogenic potential [14] [9]. These cells can resuscitate under favorable conditions, regaining full culturalbility and infectivity [9]. In the context of poultry processing, stresses such as refrigeration (4°C), exposure to atmospheric oxygen, and nutrient starvation can rapidly induce the VBNC state in C. jejuni, making contaminated products appear safe by conventional culture methods [86] [87].

PMA-qPCR Mechanism

PMA-qPCR leverages the differential membrane integrity between viable and dead cells. PMA is a DNA-intercalating dye that:

• Penetrates only cells with compromised membranes (dead cells).
• Remains excluded from cells with intact membranes (viable and VBNC cells).
• Upon photoactivation, forms stable covalent bonds with DNA, thereby inhibiting its amplification during PCR [88] [9].

Thus, following PMA treatment and photoactivation, qPCR signals originate almost exclusively from viable and VBNC cells, providing a more accurate assessment of the potential health risk.

Experimental Protocol for PMA-qPCR

This section provides a detailed methodology for detecting and quantifying viable C. jejuni on poultry meat, based on established protocols [88] [9] [90].

Sample Preparation and Spiking

• Sample Homogenization: Aseptically weigh 10 g of chicken meat (skin or breast) and transfer it to a sterile stomacher bag containing 90 mL of Bolton broth or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Homogenize for 1-2 minutes [86].
• Artificial Inoculation (for protocol validation): Prepare serial decimal dilutions of a fresh C. jejuni culture (approximately 10^8 CFU/mL) in brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth. Spike the homogenized chicken sample with known concentrations of C. jejuni (e.g., 10^7 to 10^3 CFU/g) to establish a standard curve and determine the limit of detection [86].

PMA Treatment Optimization

The efficacy of PMA-qPCR hinges on optimized treatment conditions to ensure complete suppression of dead-cell DNA amplification while minimally affecting viable cell signals.

• PMA Solution: Prepare a 1-20 mM stock solution of PMA in water and protect it from light [9] [41].
• PMA Addition: Add PMA from the stock solution to 450 µL of the sample homogenate to achieve a final optimal concentration of 20 µM [9]. Other studies have optimized concentrations up to 50 µM for complex matrices, requiring empirical validation [88] [41].
• Incubation: Incubate the PMA-sample mixture in the dark for 5-10 minutes with constant gentle mixing [9] [90].
• Photoactivation: Place the tubes horizontally on ice and expose them to a 500-650 W halogen light source for 10-15 minutes at a distance of 20 cm. This step cross-links PMA to DNA from dead cells [9] [41].

DNA Extraction

Extract genomic DNA directly from the PMA-treated sample.

• Cell Harvesting: Centrifuge the photoactivated sample at 14,000 × g for 10 min to pellet cells [86].
• DNA Purification: Extract DNA from the pellet using a commercial bacterial DNA extraction kit (e.g., Presto Mini gDNA Bacteria Kit) following the manufacturer's instructions [9]. Alternatively, a thermal lysis method (100°C for 10 min) can be used for pure cultures [9].
• DNA Quantification and Storage: Determine the DNA concentration and purity using a spectrophotometer. Store DNA at -20°C until qPCR analysis [86].

Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

The qPCR assay targets a specific gene unique to C. jejuni.

• Primers: Use primers targeting the single-copy rpoB gene [9] [90].
  • rpoB_1: 5'-GAGTAAGCTTGCTAAGATTAAAG-3'
  • rpoB_2: 5'-AAGAAGTTTTAGAGTTTCTCC-3'
  • Amplicon length: 121 bp (shorter amplicons improve PMA efficacy) [90].
• qPCR Reaction Mix: Each 20 µL reaction contains:
  • 1X SensiFAST SYBR Mix
  • 100 nM of each primer
  • 2 µL of template DNA
  • Nuclease-free water to volume [90].
• qPCR Cycling Conditions:
  • Initial Denaturation: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min.
  • 40 Cycles: 95°C for 15 sec (denaturation), 60°C for 1 min (annealing/extension).
  • Include a melt curve analysis to verify amplicon specificity [90].
• Standard Curve and Quantification: Include a standard curve in each run using serial dilutions of C. jejuni DNA with known concentrations (e.g., from 10^1 to 10^8 copies/reaction) for absolute quantification [9].

VBNC Induction and Confirmation

To generate VBNC cells for method validation:

• Induction: Suspend culturable C. jejuni cells in PBS or a 7% NaCl solution and incubate at 4°C for several days to weeks. Monitor culturability by plating on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with sheep blood until no colonies appear [9].
• Confirmation: The presence of viable, non-culturable cells is confirmed when PMA-qPCR indicates high numbers of viable cells (intact membranes) while culture plates show no growth [89] [9].

The following diagram illustrates the complete experimental workflow.

Figure 1: Experimental workflow for PMA-qPCR detection of viable C. jejuni.

Key Research Reagents and Materials

Table 1: Essential Reagents for PMA-qPCR Detection of C. jejuni

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Reference
PMA (Propidium Monoazide)	DNA intercalating dye; penetrates dead cells with compromised membranes, inhibiting DNA amplification.	[88] [9]
Halogen Light Source	Photoactivation of PMA; induces covalent cross-linking to DNA.	[9] [41]
Primers (rpoB gene)	Targets the DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta gene for C. jejuni-specific amplification.	[9] [90]
Bolton Broth	Enrichment medium used for homogenizing poultry samples.	[86]
DNA Extraction Kit	For purifying high-quality genomic DNA from sample matrices (e.g., Presto Mini gDNA Kit).	[9]
SYBR Green qPCR Mix	Fluorescent dye for real-time detection of amplified DNA during qPCR.	[90]

Performance Data and Validation

The PMA-qPCR method has been rigorously validated against culture-based methods in both pure cultures and complex food matrices like chicken meat.

Table 2: Performance Metrics of PMA-qPCR for C. jejuni Detection

Parameter	Performance in Pure Culture	Performance in Spiked Chicken Meat	Reference
Limit of Detection (LOD)	2.43 log CFU/mL	3.12 log CFU/g	[9]
Linear Quantification Range	3.43 to 8.43 log CFU/mL	3.12 to 8.43 log CFU/g (estimated)	[9]
Optimal PMA Concentration	20 µM	20 - 50 µM (may require optimization)	[88] [9]
Specificity	Specific for C. jejuni (rpoB primers)	Specific for C. jejuni in a complex matrix	[9] [90]
Correlation with Culture	High correlation for viable cells (R² > 0.99)	Detects VBNC cells missed by culture	[88] [89]

Comparative Studies and Field Data

Studies comparing PMA-qPCR with the ISO culture method (ISO 10272-1:2006) on retail chicken meat have yielded critical insights:

• One study found no significant difference in overall detection rates between the two methods. However, there was not always perfect agreement on which specific samples were positive, suggesting that each method may detect different populations of cells [91].
• An environmental study of broiler farms detected VBNC Campylobacter in 15.9% of environmental samples using PMA-qPCR, while cultural methods only detected the pathogen in 1.2% of samples [87]. This demonstrates the superior sensitivity of PMA-qPCR for assessing the true prevalence of viable Campylobacter.
• For biofilms and stressed cells, PMA-qPCR provided viable cell counts that were not significantly different from those obtained with the BacLight biovolume assay, confirming its reliability for cells exposed to extended stress [89].

Discussion

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages:

• Rapid Results: Provides results within hours, unlike culture methods that take 3-5 days [86] [9].
• Detection of VBNC Cells: Uniquely identifies the viable but non-culturable subpopulation, crucial for accurate risk assessment [87] [9].
• High Specificity and Sensitivity: qPCR is inherently specific and sensitive, and PMA treatment ensures the signal originates from viable cells [88] [9].

Limitations and Challenges:

• Matrix Effects: Complex food matrices can inhibit PMA penetration or qPCR amplification, requiring robust DNA purification and method optimization for each sample type [86] [88].
• Incomplete DNA Suppression: PMA does not always completely suppress the signal from high concentrations of dead cells, potentially leading to overestimation [88]. The use of an Internal Sample Process Control (ISPC) is recommended to monitor this [88].
• Optimization Requirement: Critical parameters like PMA concentration, incubation time, and light exposure must be empirically optimized for different sample types and bacterial strains [88] [41].

Advanced Applications: PMA-ddPCR

Recent advancements suggest that Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) combined with PMA offers a promising alternative. PMA-ddPCR provides absolute quantification without the need for a standard curve and demonstrates greater resilience to PCR inhibitors found in complex matrices [46] [41]. This method has been successfully applied to quantify VBNC state formation and resuscitation in other pathogens like Klebsiella pneumoniae, indicating its potential for future applications in Campylobacter detection [46] [41].

PMA-qPCR is a robust and powerful tool that addresses a critical flaw in conventional food safety monitoring: the inability to detect VBNC C. jejuni. The methodology detailed in this case study provides researchers and industry professionals with a validated protocol for the accurate quantification of viable C. jejuni on poultry products. While the method requires careful optimization, its ability to deliver rapid, specific, and viability-based data makes it indispensable for a realistic microbial risk assessment. Future efforts should focus on standardizing the protocol for industrial use and further exploring innovative technologies like PMA-ddPCR to enhance the reliability and throughput of viability testing, thereby strengthening the overall safety of the food supply.

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state is a dormant survival strategy adopted by many bacteria in response to environmental stresses such as nutrient starvation, temperature shifts, and exposure to antibiotics or disinfectants [11] [92]. In this state, cells undergo a reduction in metabolic activity and cannot form colonies on routine culture media, yet they remain alive, maintain membrane integrity, and can resuscitate when conditions improve [11] [5] [92]. This poses a significant challenge for public health and safety, as standard culture-based methods,

long the cornerstone of microbiological detection, fail to identify these potentially pathogenic cells, leading to an underestimation of microbial contamination in food, water, and clinical settings [11] [93] [92]. Consequently, the development and evaluation of accurate detection methods are critical components of modern VBNC research. This guide provides a detailed cost-benefit analysis of the primary methodologies, focusing on their accessibility, expertise demands, and equipment requirements to inform researchers and drug development professionals.

Comparative Analysis of Key VBNC Detection Methodologies

The following table summarizes the core technical and operational characteristics of the most prominent VBNC detection methods.

Table 1: Technical and Operational Profile of Key VBNC Detection Methods

Method Category	Key Principle	Detection Target	Throughput	Relative Cost	Key Limitations
Viability qPCR (v-qPCR)	PMA/EMA dyes inhibit DNA amplification from dead cells; qPCR detects viable cells [8] [9] [48].	Specific pathogen DNA (e.g., rpoB, groEL) [15] [9].	High	Medium	Dye concentration and incubation must be meticulously optimized for each sample matrix [8] [75].
PMA-LAMP	PMA dye inhibits DNA from dead cells; isothermal amplification under constant temperature [94].	Specific pathogen DNA (e.g., hipO for C. jejuni) [94].	High	Low-Medium	Less established for VBNC detection across diverse bacterial species [94].
Flow Cytometry	Fluorescent dyes (SYTO9/PI) differentiate cells based on membrane integrity [8] [92].	Membrane-intact cells (viable+VBNC) vs. membrane-compromised cells (dead) [8] [92].	High	High	Complex sample matrices (e.g., process wash water) cause interference and overestimation of dead cells [8] [75].
Direct Viable Count (DVC)	Microscopy after staining with nutrients and DNA-gyrase inhibitors to elongate viable cells [92].	Elongated, metabolically active cells [92].	Low	Low	Labor-intensive, subjective, and not suitable for accurate quantification [92].

The subsequent breakdown evaluates these methods against the critical dimensions of accessibility, expertise, and equipment.

Table 2: Cost-Benefit Breakdown: Accessibility, Expertise, and Equipment Requirements

Method	Accessibility & Cost	Expertise & Operational Complexity	Key Equipment Requirements
Viability qPCR (v-qPCR)	Reagent Cost: Medium (dyes, master mixes) [9].Consumables: Standard PCR consumables.Accessibility: Widely used; reagents commercially available.	Expertise: High. Requires expertise in molecular biology, qPCR assay design, and optimization of dye treatment for different sample types [8].Hands-on Time: Medium.	Real-time PCR thermocycler, spectrophotometer for DNA quantification, centrifuge, vortex mixer, darkroom/light-exposure setup for PMA [9].
PMA-LAMP	Reagent Cost: Low-Medium. Uses strand-displacing DNA polymerase and 4-6 primers [94].Consumables: Standard tubes/plates.Accessibility: High for labs with basic equipment; no thermal cycler needed.	Expertise: Medium. LAMP primer design is complex, but the assay itself is simpler to run than qPCR [94].Hands-on Time: Low. Rapid results (often <1 hour) [94].	Water bath or heat block (isothermal, ~65°C), real-time turbidimeter or simple colorimetric reader [94].
Flow Cytometry	Reagent Cost: Low (staining kits) [8].Consumables: Specialized flow tubes.Accessibility: Low. Instrument is a major capital investment.	Expertise: Very High. Requires specialized training in instrument operation, fluidics, and complex data analysis [8].Hands-on Time: Low for analysis, but sample prep varies.	Flow cytometer (high capital cost), computer with advanced analysis software [8] [93].
Direct Viable Count (DVC)	Reagent Cost: Very Low (stains, antibiotics) [92].Consumables: Microscope slides, coverslips.Accessibility: Very High.	Expertise: Low-Medium. Requires skill in microscopy and subjective interpretation of cell elongation [92].Hands-on Time: High. Labor-intensive and slow.	Epifluorescence or standard microscope.

Detailed Experimental Protocols for Key Methodologies

Viability qPCR (v-qPCR) forListeria monocytogenesDetection

This protocol, adapted from research on process wash water, details the steps for detecting VBNC L. monocytogenes using a combination of EMA and PMAxx dyes [8] [75].

• Sample Preparation and Staining:
  • Mix the bacterial sample (e.g., water sample concentrated by centrifugation) with dyes to achieve a final concentration of 10 μM EMA and 75 μM PMAxx [8] [75].
  • Incubate the mixture in the dark at 40°C for 40 minutes with constant shaking [8] [75].
• Photoactivation:
  • Expose the tube horizontally to a 500-watt halogen light source for 15 minutes on ice to crosslink the dyes to DNA from dead cells [8] [75].
• DNA Extraction:
  • Centrifuge the sample to pellet cells and wash with sterile water to remove residual dye.
  • Extract genomic DNA using a commercial kit, such as the Presto Mini gDNA Bacteria Kit, following the manufacturer's instructions [9].
• Quantitative PCR:
  • Prepare the qPCR reaction mix containing a SYBR Green master mix and primers specific to the target pathogen (e.g., for C. jejuni, the rpoB gene primers rpoB 1 and rpoB 2 can be used) [9].
  • Run the qPCR in a real-time thermocycler using standard cycling conditions. The resulting quantification cycle (Cq) values are used with a standard curve to determine the concentration of viable cells [9].

PMA-coupled Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (PMA-LAMP) forCampylobacter jejuni

This protocol enables rapid, equipment-friendly detection of VBNC C. jejuni [94].

• PMA Treatment:
  • Treat the sample with an optimal concentration of PMA (e.g., 50 μM) and incubate in the dark for 5-10 minutes [94].
  • Perform photoactivation with a halogen light source for 15-20 minutes to crosslink PMA into DNA from dead cells [94].
• DNA Extraction:
  • Extract DNA via a commercial kit or a simple boiling method (10 minutes at 100°C, followed by incubation on ice) [94] [9].
• LAMP Reaction:
  • Prepare a LAMP reaction mix containing Bst DNA polymerase, dNTPs, the specific primer set (e.g., targeting the hipO gene for C. jejuni), and the DNA template [94].
  • Incubate the reaction in a water bath or heat block at 63°C for 60 minutes [94].
• Detection:
  • Monitor amplification in real-time using a turbidimeter that measures the precipitate of magnesium pyrophosphate, or perform endpoint detection by adding an intercalating dye like SYBR Green and observing a color change under UV light [94].

The workflow for these molecular methods, from sample preparation to result interpretation, is visualized below.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Successful VBNC research relies on a suite of specialized reagents and materials. The following table outlines key solutions and their critical functions.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for VBNC Studies

Research Reagent / Material	Function & Application in VBNC Research
Propidium Monoazide (PMA) / PMAxx	Membrane-impermeant viability dye. Selectively enters dead cells with compromised membranes, cross-links to DNA upon light exposure, and inhibits its PCR amplification. PMAxx is an improved version offering better suppression of dead cell signals [8] [9].
Ethidium Monoazide (EMA)	Membrane-permeant viability dye. Can penetrate some cells with intact membranes via efflux pumps. Often used in combination with PMAxx for enhanced discrimination in complex samples [8] [75].
SYTO 9 / Propidium Iodide (PI)	Fluorescent nucleic acid stains for viability assessment. SYTO 9 labels all cells (green), while PI labels only dead cells with damaged membranes (red). Used in flow cytometry and microscopy [8] [92].
Chlorine (Sodium Hypochlorite)	A common sanitizer used to induce the VBNC state in laboratory studies, mimicking industrial washing processes [8] [75].
Specific Primers (e.g., for rpoB, groEL)	Oligonucleotides designed to target unique gene sequences of the pathogen of interest (e.g., rpoB for C. jejuni, groEL for V. parahaemolyticus) for specific detection via qPCR or LAMP [15] [9].
Bst DNA Polymerase	A strand-displacing DNA polymerase essential for performing Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) under isothermal conditions [94].

The choice of a VBNC detection method involves a clear trade-off between cost, complexity, and analytical needs. Viability qPCR offers an excellent balance of specificity, sensitivity, and throughput, making it a powerful choice for labs with molecular biology expertise, though it requires careful optimization [8] [9]. PMA-LAMP presents a highly accessible and rapid alternative with lower equipment costs, ideal for field-use or resource-limited settings, though its application is still being validated for a wide range of pathogens [94]. While Flow Cytometry provides rapid, dye-based viability analysis, its high capital cost and susceptibility to matrix interference can be prohibitive for routine targeted detection [8] [75] [93].

For researchers, the strategic path forward involves aligning methodological choice with the project's specific context. High-throughput food safety monitoring may justify the setup for v-qPCR, while studies of a specific pathogen in the field could benefit from developing a rapid PMA-LAMP test. Ultimately, advancing VBNC research depends on selecting the right tool from this evolving toolkit, ensuring that these dormant, yet dangerous, bacterial cells are accurately identified and quantified to safeguard public health.

Conclusion

The accurate detection of VBNC cells is no longer a niche concern but a critical necessity for robust microbiological risk assessment in clinical and industrial settings. This analysis underscores that while no single method is flawless, molecular techniques like optimized v-PCR and emerging AI-driven technologies offer the most promising path forward for specific, sensitive, and quantitative detection. The future of managing VBNC-related risks hinges on a multi-faceted approach: the widespread adoption of these culture-independent methods in diagnostic pipelines, a deeper investigation into the mechanisms governing resuscitation to prevent disease recurrence, and the urgent development of novel therapeutic agents specifically designed to eradicate dormant, treatment-tolerant bacterial populations. For researchers and drug developers, integrating VBNC assessment into standard workflows is paramount to overcoming a significant hidden reservoir of bacterial persistence and antimicrobial resistance.

References

• 1. Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria: Food Safety and Public ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3804398/]
• 2. The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4040921/]
• 3. Viable but Nonculturable - an overview [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/viable-but-nonculturable]
• 4. How to Evaluate Non-Growing Cells—Current Strategies ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/2/115]
• 5. Viable but non-cultivable state in oral microbiota [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1533768/full]
• 6. a fundamental survival strategy of Acinetobacter baumannii [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10653857/]
• 7. Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-culturable State in ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00580/full]
• 8. Detection and Quantification Methods for Viable but Non- ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7214806/]
• 9. Detection and Quantification of Viable but Non-culturable ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02920/full]
• 10. Induction of the viable but non-culturable state in bacterial ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-33595-5]
• 11. How to Evaluate Non-Growing Cells—Current Strategies ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7912045/]
• 12. Quantitative Detection of VBNC State Pseudomonas ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/2/236]
• 13. Effect of Environmental Conditions on the ... - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7550757/]
• 14. Rapid Detection and Fast Induction of Viable but ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001759]
• 15. Rapid detection and fast induction of viable but non- ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40975495/]
• 16. Understanding the transition to viable but non-culturable state ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11098925/]
• 17. Bacterial persisters: molecular mechanisms and ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-01866-5]
• 18. Quantitative detection and survival analysis of VBNC ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11302299/]
• 19. Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-culturable State in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5378802/]
• 20. Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/6/1179]
• 21. Detection of Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/11/10/2492]
• 22. Relationship between the Viable but Nonculturable State and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6153661/]
• 23. Latest Developments of Research on the Viable Non ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/3/1454]
• 24. A subpopulation of viable but non-culturable cells ... [https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1009194%20]
• 25. Bridging the gap between viable but non-culturable and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966842X14001954]
• 26. viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria [https://microgendx.com/vbnc-viable-but-non-culturable-cells-dectection/]
• 27. Absolute quantification of VBNC state formation and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12535994/]
• 28. Detection of Viable but Nonculturable E. coli Induced by ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400214X]
• 29. The Pathogenic Potential of a Microbe - PMC - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5322344/]
• 30. Confusion over live/dead stainings for the detection of vital ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3898065/]
• 31. Assessment and Interpretation of Bacterial Viability by ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1907116/]
• 32. Significance of Viable But Non-culturable (VBNC) State in ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-024-03947-8]
• 33. Detection and quantification of viable but non-culturable ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1094877/full]
• 34. Dead Cell Identification in Flow Cytometry [https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/newsletters-and-journals/bioprobes-journal-of-cell-biology-applications/bioprobes-issues-2011/bioprobes-64-april-2011/eliminate-dead-cells-for-increased-accuracy-april-2011.html]
• 35. Viable Cell Detection Using Propidium Monoazide and ... [https://www.nature.com/research-intelligence/nri-topic-summaries/viable-cell-detection-using-propidium-monoazide-and-quantitative-pcr-micro-70074]
• 36. Viability PCR - Biotium [https://biotium.com/technology/pma-for-viability-pcr/]
• 37. Life of the Party: Viability PCR (vPCR) [https://bitesizebio.com/24968/life-of-the-party-viability-pcr-vpcr/]
• 38. PMA dye | Propidium Monoazide | Biotium, Inc. [https://biotium.com/product/pma-propidium-monoazide/]
• 39. The application of a viability real-time PCR assay to detect ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950194625000743]
• 40. Detection and Potential Virulence of Viable but Non-culturable ... [https://scholarworks.uark.edu/fdscpub/24/]
• 41. Absolute quantification of VBNC state formation and ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1627943/full]
• 42. An Improved Real-Time Viability PCR Assay to Detect ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9738789/]
• 43. Alternative Chemistries for Improved Live-Dead Discrimination [https://www.aatbio.com/resources/assaywise/2025-14-1/next-generation-viability-pcr-alternative-chemistries-for-improved-live-dead-discrimination]
• 44. Optimization and Testing of a Commercial Viability PCR ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/4/765]
• 45. Development of a viability digital PCR protocol for the ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47976-x]
• 46. Absolute quantification of VBNC state formation and ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41122686/]
• 47. Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4116801/]
• 48. Detection and distribution of vbnc/viable pathogenic ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389420323256]
• 49. Improved Direct Viable Count Procedure for Quantitative ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC92502/]
• 50. Metabolic activity of bacterial cells enumerated by direct viable count - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3324968/]
• 51. Cell Viability Assay based on Metabolic Activity | ABP Biosciences [https://www.abpbio.com/product/cell-viability-assay-based-on-metabolic-activity/]
• 52. Application of a rapid direct viable count method to deep- ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167701204000508]
• 53. Metabolic characteristics and markers in viable but ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935122014384]
• 54. [PDF] Detection and Potential Virulence of Viable but Non- ... [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Detection-and-Potential-Virulence-of-Viable-but-A-Wideman-Oliver/b5c81be77db8123a859fc5b30f82f869d545148c]
• 55. Intraoperative multispectral and hyperspectral label-free ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6736677/]
• 56. Label-free, real-time classification of leukemia cells using ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350449525005389]
• 57. Label-free classification of neurons and glia in neural stem ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37241-y]
• 58. Enhancing AI microscopy for foodborne bacterial classification ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12378515/]
• 59. Strategies for the Detection and Elimination of Matrix ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/strategies-detection-and-elimination-matrix-effects-quantitative-lc-ms-analysis]
• 60. Overcoming Matrix Interference in LC-MS/MS [https://www.sepscience.com/overcoming-matrix-interference-in-lc-ms-ms-12015]
• 61. Cu2+-activated dye-sensitized upconversion nanoprobe: ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389425025099]
• 62. Matrix Interference of Vegetable on Enzyme-Linked ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12524109/]
• 63. Overcoming Matrix Effects in Non-Target Screening [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12224152/]
• 64. Matrix Effect Assessment via Matrix Matching Strategy ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003267025010864]
• 65. PMA-qPCR to quantify viable cells in multispecies oral ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12051517/]
• 66. An Improved Real-Time Viability PCR Assay to Detect ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/23/14708]
• 67. Experimental design for the optimization of propidium ... [https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12866-015-0505-6]
• 68. A Fast and Easy ATP-Based Approach Enables MIC ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6587809/]
• 69. Development of a Direct and Rapid Detection Method for ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.687691/full]
• 70. Viable but non-cultivable state in oral microbiota [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40171166/]
• 71. Combating Gram-negative infections: The role of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12546895/]
• 72. Rapid Discrimination of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative ... [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047093]
• 73. Monitoring for early prediction of gram-negative bacteremia ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-025-01200-2]
• 74. Optimization of a propidium monoazide-qPCR method for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168160519303988]
• 75. Detection and Quantification Methods for Viable but Non ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00673/full]
• 76. Development of a High - Throughput Assay for Detecting... qPCR [https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi/10.46234/ccdcw2025.016]
• 77. Real-time quantitative PCR assay development and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7298852/]
• 78. The Viable But Non-Culturable State of Listeria ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.849915/full]
• 79. Detection and Potential Virulence of Viable but Non- ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33477778/]
• 80. Formation and recovery of Listeria monocytogenes in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996924008445]
• 81. Application of propidium monoazide quantitative PCR to ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805820/]
• 82. Development and validation of a PMA-qPCR method for ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1456274/full]
• 83. A Basic Guide to Real Time PCR in Microbial Diagnostics [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5288344/]
• 84. Effectiveness of Washing Procedures in Reducing ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5071777/]
• 85. Multi-laboratory validation study of a real-time PCR method ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0740002025000930]
• 86. Enrichment Free qPCR for Rapid Identification and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8535059/]
• 87. Detection of Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37894150/]
• 88. Viability Quantitative PCR Utilizing Propidium Monoazide ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6805072/]
• 89. Evaluation of Propidium Monoazide and Quantitative PCR ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X23055357]
• 90. PMA-qPCR [https://bio-protocol.org/exchange/minidetail?id=5934525&type=30]
• 91. Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken meat using ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123004029]
• 92. Overview of VBNC, a survival strategy for microorganisms [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9526772/]
• 93. VBNC bacteria: challenging detection (and a breakthrough ... [https://www.bnovate.com/post/vbnc-bacteria]
• 94. Rapid determination of viable but non-culturable ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168160521002221]